{"title":"准备好了吗?研究生教师通过顶点评估任务对课堂准备情况的看法","authors":"Michelle Ludecke, Rebecca Cooper","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2023.2177138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the TEMAG Review we, as teacher educators in initial teacher education (ITE), have seen a gradual yet perceptible shift in the way pre-service teachers demonstrate their “classroom readiness.” In the past readiness was connected to preparing evidence for a job interview. Now, classroom readiness is determined by a pre-service teacher’s ability to meet the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers at the Graduate level through a capstone assessment task – the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). We take a phenomenographic approach to explore variations in the ways pre-service teachers viewed the authenticity of the TPA as an assessment of their classroom readiness. We draw data from three points in time: TPA, SETU responses, and interviews, to examine pre-service teachers' perceptions of readiness. Our question is: How do graduate teachers perceive themselves as ready to make the transition to teaching? As a result of our analysis we posit that teacher readiness takes time, and requires a state of metaxis in a liminal phase. We reposition point-in-time notions of classroom readiness such as “Action Now!” as liminal phases of transformation, in which authentic and mutually beneficial working relationships between ITE, PSTs and schools create the space and time needed to prepare “quality” graduate teachers.","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"183 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ready, or not? Graduate teachers’ perceptions of their classroom readiness through a capstone assessment task\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Ludecke, Rebecca Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2023.2177138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Since the TEMAG Review we, as teacher educators in initial teacher education (ITE), have seen a gradual yet perceptible shift in the way pre-service teachers demonstrate their “classroom readiness.” In the past readiness was connected to preparing evidence for a job interview. Now, classroom readiness is determined by a pre-service teacher’s ability to meet the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers at the Graduate level through a capstone assessment task – the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). We take a phenomenographic approach to explore variations in the ways pre-service teachers viewed the authenticity of the TPA as an assessment of their classroom readiness. We draw data from three points in time: TPA, SETU responses, and interviews, to examine pre-service teachers' perceptions of readiness. Our question is: How do graduate teachers perceive themselves as ready to make the transition to teaching? As a result of our analysis we posit that teacher readiness takes time, and requires a state of metaxis in a liminal phase. We reposition point-in-time notions of classroom readiness such as “Action Now!” as liminal phases of transformation, in which authentic and mutually beneficial working relationships between ITE, PSTs and schools create the space and time needed to prepare “quality” graduate teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2023.2177138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2023.2177138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ready, or not? Graduate teachers’ perceptions of their classroom readiness through a capstone assessment task
ABSTRACT Since the TEMAG Review we, as teacher educators in initial teacher education (ITE), have seen a gradual yet perceptible shift in the way pre-service teachers demonstrate their “classroom readiness.” In the past readiness was connected to preparing evidence for a job interview. Now, classroom readiness is determined by a pre-service teacher’s ability to meet the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers at the Graduate level through a capstone assessment task – the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). We take a phenomenographic approach to explore variations in the ways pre-service teachers viewed the authenticity of the TPA as an assessment of their classroom readiness. We draw data from three points in time: TPA, SETU responses, and interviews, to examine pre-service teachers' perceptions of readiness. Our question is: How do graduate teachers perceive themselves as ready to make the transition to teaching? As a result of our analysis we posit that teacher readiness takes time, and requires a state of metaxis in a liminal phase. We reposition point-in-time notions of classroom readiness such as “Action Now!” as liminal phases of transformation, in which authentic and mutually beneficial working relationships between ITE, PSTs and schools create the space and time needed to prepare “quality” graduate teachers.
期刊介绍:
This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.