准备好了吗?研究生教师通过顶点评估任务对课堂准备情况的看法

IF 1.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Michelle Ludecke, Rebecca Cooper
{"title":"准备好了吗?研究生教师通过顶点评估任务对课堂准备情况的看法","authors":"Michelle Ludecke, Rebecca Cooper","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2023.2177138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the TEMAG Review we, as teacher educators in initial teacher education (ITE), have seen a gradual yet perceptible shift in the way pre-service teachers demonstrate their “classroom readiness.” In the past readiness was connected to preparing evidence for a job interview. Now, classroom readiness is determined by a pre-service teacher’s ability to meet the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers at the Graduate level through a capstone assessment task – the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). We take a phenomenographic approach to explore variations in the ways pre-service teachers viewed the authenticity of the TPA as an assessment of their classroom readiness. We draw data from three points in time: TPA, SETU responses, and interviews, to examine pre-service teachers' perceptions of readiness. Our question is: How do graduate teachers perceive themselves as ready to make the transition to teaching? As a result of our analysis we posit that teacher readiness takes time, and requires a state of metaxis in a liminal phase. We reposition point-in-time notions of classroom readiness such as “Action Now!” as liminal phases of transformation, in which authentic and mutually beneficial working relationships between ITE, PSTs and schools create the space and time needed to prepare “quality” graduate teachers.","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"183 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ready, or not? Graduate teachers’ perceptions of their classroom readiness through a capstone assessment task\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Ludecke, Rebecca Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2023.2177138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Since the TEMAG Review we, as teacher educators in initial teacher education (ITE), have seen a gradual yet perceptible shift in the way pre-service teachers demonstrate their “classroom readiness.” In the past readiness was connected to preparing evidence for a job interview. Now, classroom readiness is determined by a pre-service teacher’s ability to meet the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers at the Graduate level through a capstone assessment task – the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). We take a phenomenographic approach to explore variations in the ways pre-service teachers viewed the authenticity of the TPA as an assessment of their classroom readiness. We draw data from three points in time: TPA, SETU responses, and interviews, to examine pre-service teachers' perceptions of readiness. Our question is: How do graduate teachers perceive themselves as ready to make the transition to teaching? As a result of our analysis we posit that teacher readiness takes time, and requires a state of metaxis in a liminal phase. We reposition point-in-time notions of classroom readiness such as “Action Now!” as liminal phases of transformation, in which authentic and mutually beneficial working relationships between ITE, PSTs and schools create the space and time needed to prepare “quality” graduate teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2023.2177138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2023.2177138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要自TEMAG评审以来,作为初级师范教育(ITE)的教师教育工作者,我们看到职前教师展示“课堂准备”的方式发生了逐渐但明显的转变。过去,准备与准备求职面试的证据有关。现在,课堂准备情况取决于职前教师通过一项最重要的评估任务——教学绩效评估(TPA)达到澳大利亚研究生教师专业标准的能力。我们采用现象学的方法来探索职前教师将TPA的真实性视为对其课堂准备情况的评估的方式的差异。我们从三个时间点获取数据:TPA、SETU回应和访谈,以检验职前教师对准备就绪的看法。我们的问题是:研究生教师如何看待自己准备好向教学过渡?根据我们的分析,我们认为教师的准备需要时间,并且需要处于临界阶段的元语言状态。我们将课堂准备的时间点概念(如“立即行动!”)重新定位为转型的临界阶段,在这个阶段,ITE、PST和学校之间真实互利的工作关系创造了培养“优质”研究生教师所需的空间和时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ready, or not? Graduate teachers’ perceptions of their classroom readiness through a capstone assessment task
ABSTRACT Since the TEMAG Review we, as teacher educators in initial teacher education (ITE), have seen a gradual yet perceptible shift in the way pre-service teachers demonstrate their “classroom readiness.” In the past readiness was connected to preparing evidence for a job interview. Now, classroom readiness is determined by a pre-service teacher’s ability to meet the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers at the Graduate level through a capstone assessment task – the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). We take a phenomenographic approach to explore variations in the ways pre-service teachers viewed the authenticity of the TPA as an assessment of their classroom readiness. We draw data from three points in time: TPA, SETU responses, and interviews, to examine pre-service teachers' perceptions of readiness. Our question is: How do graduate teachers perceive themselves as ready to make the transition to teaching? As a result of our analysis we posit that teacher readiness takes time, and requires a state of metaxis in a liminal phase. We reposition point-in-time notions of classroom readiness such as “Action Now!” as liminal phases of transformation, in which authentic and mutually beneficial working relationships between ITE, PSTs and schools create the space and time needed to prepare “quality” graduate teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信