公民教育和学校社会互动是有意参与选举的驱动因素:四种欧洲学校制度的异同

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
D. Deimel, Katrin Hahn-Laudenberg, J. Ziemes, H. Abs
{"title":"公民教育和学校社会互动是有意参与选举的驱动因素:四种欧洲学校制度的异同","authors":"D. Deimel, Katrin Hahn-Laudenberg, J. Ziemes, H. Abs","doi":"10.1177/17461979221114549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through civic education and social interactions at school, students are able to develop more or less political knowledge and trust in political institutions. Both precede intended electoral participation. However, it is disputed whether the relationship between political knowledge, trust, and intended participation is consistent across countries. We analyze data from the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 that consist of representative subsamples for 14-year-old students ( N = 14,567) in Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, and Germany (North Rhine-Westphalia). A structural equation model approach reveals that both political knowledge and trust in political institutions contribute to explaining variation in adolescents’ intended electoral participation. The effect of political knowledge is partly mediated by trust, which in turn is negatively associated with political knowledge in Bulgaria and Croatia and positively in Denmark and Germany (NRW). These results are discussed in the light of country-specific differences in the political context of civic education.","PeriodicalId":45472,"journal":{"name":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civic education and social interactions at school as drivers of intended electoral participation: Similarities and differences in four European school systems\",\"authors\":\"D. Deimel, Katrin Hahn-Laudenberg, J. Ziemes, H. Abs\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17461979221114549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through civic education and social interactions at school, students are able to develop more or less political knowledge and trust in political institutions. Both precede intended electoral participation. However, it is disputed whether the relationship between political knowledge, trust, and intended participation is consistent across countries. We analyze data from the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 that consist of representative subsamples for 14-year-old students ( N = 14,567) in Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, and Germany (North Rhine-Westphalia). A structural equation model approach reveals that both political knowledge and trust in political institutions contribute to explaining variation in adolescents’ intended electoral participation. The effect of political knowledge is partly mediated by trust, which in turn is negatively associated with political knowledge in Bulgaria and Croatia and positively in Denmark and Germany (NRW). These results are discussed in the light of country-specific differences in the political context of civic education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Citizenship and Social Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Citizenship and Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979221114549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979221114549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过学校的公民教育和社会互动,学生能够或多或少地发展政治知识和对政治机构的信任。两者都先于预期的选举参与。然而,政治知识、信任和有意参与之间的关系在各国之间是否一致,这一点存在争议。我们分析了2016年国际公民和公民教育研究的数据,该研究包括14岁学生的代表性子样本(N = 14567)在保加利亚、克罗地亚、丹麦和德国(北莱茵-威斯特法伦州)。结构方程模型方法表明,政治知识和对政治机构的信任都有助于解释青少年有意参与选举的差异。政治知识的影响在一定程度上是由信任介导的,而信任反过来与保加利亚和克罗地亚的政治知识呈负相关,与丹麦和德国的政治知识呈正相关。这些结果是根据公民教育政治背景下各国的具体差异进行讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Civic education and social interactions at school as drivers of intended electoral participation: Similarities and differences in four European school systems
Through civic education and social interactions at school, students are able to develop more or less political knowledge and trust in political institutions. Both precede intended electoral participation. However, it is disputed whether the relationship between political knowledge, trust, and intended participation is consistent across countries. We analyze data from the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 that consist of representative subsamples for 14-year-old students ( N = 14,567) in Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, and Germany (North Rhine-Westphalia). A structural equation model approach reveals that both political knowledge and trust in political institutions contribute to explaining variation in adolescents’ intended electoral participation. The effect of political knowledge is partly mediated by trust, which in turn is negatively associated with political knowledge in Bulgaria and Croatia and positively in Denmark and Germany (NRW). These results are discussed in the light of country-specific differences in the political context of civic education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Citizenship and Social Justice
Education Citizenship and Social Justice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信