大学生非自杀性自伤三种筛查方法的比较分析

IF 1 Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of College Counseling Pub Date : 2018-10-08 DOI:10.1002/jocc.12105

Emily M. Lund, Katie B. Thomas, Danielle R. Nadorff, Lauren M. Bouchard, Kate Galbraith, April R. Bradley

{"title":"大学生非自杀性自伤三种筛查方法的比较分析","authors":"Emily M. Lund, Katie B. Thomas, Danielle R. Nadorff, Lauren M. Bouchard, Kate Galbraith, April R. Bradley","doi":"10.1002/jocc.12105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared college students’ (N = 260) responses on a simple dichotomous screening measure and 2 behavior checklists. Seventy-nine participants (30.4%) screened positive (i.e., endorsed nonsuicidal self-injury [NSSI] behavior) on at least 1 measure, and 37 (46.8%) screened positive on the simple screen. Participants who screened positive on the simple screen reported more forms and instances of NSSI than did those who screened positive only on the checklist measures. They also reported significantly greater psychological distress compared with all other participant groups.","PeriodicalId":46373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jocc.12105","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Three Screening Methods for Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in College Students\",\"authors\":\"Emily M. Lund, Katie B. Thomas, Danielle R. Nadorff, Lauren M. Bouchard, Kate Galbraith, April R. Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jocc.12105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compared college students’ (N = 260) responses on a simple dichotomous screening measure and 2 behavior checklists. Seventy-nine participants (30.4%) screened positive (i.e., endorsed nonsuicidal self-injury [NSSI] behavior) on at least 1 measure, and 37 (46.8%) screened positive on the simple screen. Participants who screened positive on the simple screen reported more forms and instances of NSSI than did those who screened positive only on the checklist measures. They also reported significantly greater psychological distress compared with all other participant groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Counseling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jocc.12105\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocc.12105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocc.12105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究比较了大学生(N = 260)在简单的二分筛选量表和两个行为检查表上的反应。79名参与者(30.4%)在至少一项测试中呈阳性(即认可非自杀性自伤行为)，37名参与者(46.8%)在简单测试中呈阳性。在简单筛查中呈阳性的参与者报告的自伤形式和实例比那些仅在检查表测量中呈阳性的参与者多。与所有其他参与者组相比，他们也报告了更大的心理困扰。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Comparative Analysis of Three Screening Methods for Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in College Students

This study compared college students’ (N = 260) responses on a simple dichotomous screening measure and 2 behavior checklists. Seventy-nine participants (30.4%) screened positive (i.e., endorsed nonsuicidal self-injury [NSSI] behavior) on at least 1 measure, and 37 (46.8%) screened positive on the simple screen. Participants who screened positive on the simple screen reported more forms and instances of NSSI than did those who screened positive only on the checklist measures. They also reported significantly greater psychological distress compared with all other participant groups.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of College Counseling PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of College Counseling, a publication of the American College Counseling Association, is issued twice yearly. ACCA members receive the Journal as a benefit of membership.