自上而下和自下而上的代理人是否同意国际化?西班牙大学的混合方法研究

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Rosana Villares Maldonado
{"title":"自上而下和自下而上的代理人是否同意国际化?西班牙大学的混合方法研究","authors":"Rosana Villares Maldonado","doi":"10.6035/languagev.6845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the implementation of internationalisation in the Spanish university system and its effects from a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative corpus linguistics techniques and qualitative interview protocols. Results from the quantitative and qualitative analysis showed that Spanish universities’ written policies align with the national framework and rely on a complementary use of ‘abroad’ and ‘at home’ strategies for research and education mostly through mobility, collaboration, and English-medium instruction. A positive representation of internationalisation is also identified, with both top-down and bottom-up actors stressing its benefits for society and individuals. Yet, some critical voices pointed at mismatches between institutional views and stakeholders’ experiences, questioning the sufficient allocation of resources and lack of recognition and incentives. The paper argues that effective comprehensive internationalisation should include written internationalisation plans, communication strategies, and a clearly defined internationalisation model adapted to the universities’ particularities.","PeriodicalId":36244,"journal":{"name":"Language Value","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do top-down and bottom-up agents agree on internationalisation? A mixed methods study of Spanish universities\",\"authors\":\"Rosana Villares Maldonado\",\"doi\":\"10.6035/languagev.6845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the implementation of internationalisation in the Spanish university system and its effects from a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative corpus linguistics techniques and qualitative interview protocols. Results from the quantitative and qualitative analysis showed that Spanish universities’ written policies align with the national framework and rely on a complementary use of ‘abroad’ and ‘at home’ strategies for research and education mostly through mobility, collaboration, and English-medium instruction. A positive representation of internationalisation is also identified, with both top-down and bottom-up actors stressing its benefits for society and individuals. Yet, some critical voices pointed at mismatches between institutional views and stakeholders’ experiences, questioning the sufficient allocation of resources and lack of recognition and incentives. The paper argues that effective comprehensive internationalisation should include written internationalisation plans, communication strategies, and a clearly defined internationalisation model adapted to the universities’ particularities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Value\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Value\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6035/languagev.6845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Value","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6035/languagev.6845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文结合定量语料库语言学技术和定性访谈协议,采用混合方法探讨了国际化在西班牙大学系统中的实施及其效果。定量和定性分析的结果表明,西班牙大学的书面政策与国家框架一致,并主要通过流动性、协作和英语教学,在研究和教育方面互补使用“国外”和“国内”战略。还确定了国际化的积极代表,自上而下和自下而上的行动者都强调国际化对社会和个人的好处。然而,一些批评声音指出,机构观点与利益攸关方的经验不匹配,质疑资源的充分分配以及缺乏认可和激励。本文认为,有效的全面国际化应包括书面的国际化计划、沟通策略和明确的国际化模式,以适应大学的特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do top-down and bottom-up agents agree on internationalisation? A mixed methods study of Spanish universities
This paper explores the implementation of internationalisation in the Spanish university system and its effects from a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative corpus linguistics techniques and qualitative interview protocols. Results from the quantitative and qualitative analysis showed that Spanish universities’ written policies align with the national framework and rely on a complementary use of ‘abroad’ and ‘at home’ strategies for research and education mostly through mobility, collaboration, and English-medium instruction. A positive representation of internationalisation is also identified, with both top-down and bottom-up actors stressing its benefits for society and individuals. Yet, some critical voices pointed at mismatches between institutional views and stakeholders’ experiences, questioning the sufficient allocation of resources and lack of recognition and incentives. The paper argues that effective comprehensive internationalisation should include written internationalisation plans, communication strategies, and a clearly defined internationalisation model adapted to the universities’ particularities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Value
Language Value Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信