使用多时相激光雷达DEM评估冲沟侵蚀和修复:澳大利亚大堡礁集水区的案例研究

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sana Khan , Rebecca Bartley , Anne Kinsey-Henderson , Aaron Hawdon
{"title":"使用多时相激光雷达DEM评估冲沟侵蚀和修复:澳大利亚大堡礁集水区的案例研究","authors":"Sana Khan ,&nbsp;Rebecca Bartley ,&nbsp;Anne Kinsey-Henderson ,&nbsp;Aaron Hawdon","doi":"10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Millions of dollars are being spent on gully rehabilitation to help reduce excess fine sediment delivery to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). There is an urgent need for (i) prioritisation of active gullies for rehabilitation and (ii) the development of methodologies to inform the effectiveness of remediation. In this study we analyse DEMs of Difference derived from 0.5 m resolution 2–3 year interval multi-temporal LiDAR data collected pre and post rehabilitation at three variable gully morphologies in the Burdekin catchment. Our analysis indicates that the highest annual average fine sediment erosion rates for the untreated control gullies occur at the linear gully (53.38 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) followed by linear-alluvial gully (34.24 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) and least at the alluvial gully (14.41 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>). The proportional loss or export of fine sediment from the gullies in their un-treated condition ranges from ∼68 to 90% of what is eroded, and when the gullies are treated the proportion of fine sediment that is retained in the gully proportional to what is eroded increases to ∼60% at all sites. Without pre-treatment baseline erosion rates, and additional post treatment LiDAR captures, it is difficult to quantify the treatment effectiveness. Our results offer insights in the erosion mechanisms within different geomorphic gully morphologies and rehabilitation effects in these erosional landforms. This study provides crucial knowledge of gully dynamics that can be coupled with other lines of evidence for better prioritisation of rehabilitation in the GBR catchments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48622,"journal":{"name":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 184-199"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000448/pdfft?md5=ae23cdae0a7cf585258ac004dc0ae6a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2095633923000448-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing gully erosion and rehabilitation using multi temporal LiDAR DEMs: Case study from the Great Barrier Reef catchments, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Sana Khan ,&nbsp;Rebecca Bartley ,&nbsp;Anne Kinsey-Henderson ,&nbsp;Aaron Hawdon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Millions of dollars are being spent on gully rehabilitation to help reduce excess fine sediment delivery to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). There is an urgent need for (i) prioritisation of active gullies for rehabilitation and (ii) the development of methodologies to inform the effectiveness of remediation. In this study we analyse DEMs of Difference derived from 0.5 m resolution 2–3 year interval multi-temporal LiDAR data collected pre and post rehabilitation at three variable gully morphologies in the Burdekin catchment. Our analysis indicates that the highest annual average fine sediment erosion rates for the untreated control gullies occur at the linear gully (53.38 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) followed by linear-alluvial gully (34.24 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) and least at the alluvial gully (14.41 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>). The proportional loss or export of fine sediment from the gullies in their un-treated condition ranges from ∼68 to 90% of what is eroded, and when the gullies are treated the proportion of fine sediment that is retained in the gully proportional to what is eroded increases to ∼60% at all sites. Without pre-treatment baseline erosion rates, and additional post treatment LiDAR captures, it is difficult to quantify the treatment effectiveness. Our results offer insights in the erosion mechanisms within different geomorphic gully morphologies and rehabilitation effects in these erosional landforms. This study provides crucial knowledge of gully dynamics that can be coupled with other lines of evidence for better prioritisation of rehabilitation in the GBR catchments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Soil and Water Conservation Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 184-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000448/pdfft?md5=ae23cdae0a7cf585258ac004dc0ae6a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2095633923000448-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Soil and Water Conservation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000448\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000448","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数百万美元被用于修复沟壑,以帮助减少向大堡礁输送的过量细沉积物。目前迫切需要(i)优先考虑主动沟渠的修复工作,以及(ii)制定方法,以告知修复的有效性。在这项研究中,我们分析了在Burdekin流域三个不同的沟壑形态下收集的0.5 m分辨率2-3年间隔的多时相激光雷达数据在恢复前后获得的dem差异。分析表明,未经处理的控制沟的年平均细沙侵蚀速率最高的是线性沟(53.38 tha−1 y−1),其次是线性冲积沟(34.24 tha−1 y−1),冲积沟最小(14.41 tha−1 y−1)。在未处理的条件下,细泥沙从沟渠中损失或输出的比例为侵蚀量的68%至90%,而当沟渠经过处理后,沟渠中保留的细泥沙比例与侵蚀量成比例,在所有地点都增加到60%。如果没有处理前的基线侵蚀率,以及处理后额外的激光雷达捕获,很难量化处理效果。我们的研究结果对不同地貌沟壑形态的侵蚀机制和这些侵蚀地貌的修复效应提供了新的见解。这项研究提供了沟壑动力学的关键知识,可以与其他证据相结合,更好地确定GBR流域修复的优先顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing gully erosion and rehabilitation using multi temporal LiDAR DEMs: Case study from the Great Barrier Reef catchments, Australia

Millions of dollars are being spent on gully rehabilitation to help reduce excess fine sediment delivery to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). There is an urgent need for (i) prioritisation of active gullies for rehabilitation and (ii) the development of methodologies to inform the effectiveness of remediation. In this study we analyse DEMs of Difference derived from 0.5 m resolution 2–3 year interval multi-temporal LiDAR data collected pre and post rehabilitation at three variable gully morphologies in the Burdekin catchment. Our analysis indicates that the highest annual average fine sediment erosion rates for the untreated control gullies occur at the linear gully (53.38 t ha−1 y−1) followed by linear-alluvial gully (34.24 t ha−1 y−1) and least at the alluvial gully (14.41 t ha−1 y−1). The proportional loss or export of fine sediment from the gullies in their un-treated condition ranges from ∼68 to 90% of what is eroded, and when the gullies are treated the proportion of fine sediment that is retained in the gully proportional to what is eroded increases to ∼60% at all sites. Without pre-treatment baseline erosion rates, and additional post treatment LiDAR captures, it is difficult to quantify the treatment effectiveness. Our results offer insights in the erosion mechanisms within different geomorphic gully morphologies and rehabilitation effects in these erosional landforms. This study provides crucial knowledge of gully dynamics that can be coupled with other lines of evidence for better prioritisation of rehabilitation in the GBR catchments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
International Soil and Water Conservation Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR), the official journal of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) http://www.waswac.org, is a multidisciplinary journal of soil and water conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and promote the practice of soil and water conservation. The scope of International Soil and Water Conservation Research includes research, strategies, and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection of soil and water resources. It deals with identification, characterization, and modeling; dynamic monitoring and evaluation; assessment and management of conservation practice and creation and implementation of quality standards. Examples of appropriate topical areas include (but are not limited to): • Conservation models, tools, and technologies • Conservation agricultural • Soil health resources, indicators, assessment, and management • Land degradation • Sustainable development • Soil erosion and its control • Soil erosion processes • Water resources assessment and management • Watershed management • Soil erosion models • Literature review on topics related soil and water conservation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信