Sana Khan , Rebecca Bartley , Anne Kinsey-Henderson , Aaron Hawdon
{"title":"使用多时相激光雷达DEM评估冲沟侵蚀和修复:澳大利亚大堡礁集水区的案例研究","authors":"Sana Khan , Rebecca Bartley , Anne Kinsey-Henderson , Aaron Hawdon","doi":"10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Millions of dollars are being spent on gully rehabilitation to help reduce excess fine sediment delivery to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). There is an urgent need for (i) prioritisation of active gullies for rehabilitation and (ii) the development of methodologies to inform the effectiveness of remediation. In this study we analyse DEMs of Difference derived from 0.5 m resolution 2–3 year interval multi-temporal LiDAR data collected pre and post rehabilitation at three variable gully morphologies in the Burdekin catchment. Our analysis indicates that the highest annual average fine sediment erosion rates for the untreated control gullies occur at the linear gully (53.38 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) followed by linear-alluvial gully (34.24 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) and least at the alluvial gully (14.41 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>). The proportional loss or export of fine sediment from the gullies in their un-treated condition ranges from ∼68 to 90% of what is eroded, and when the gullies are treated the proportion of fine sediment that is retained in the gully proportional to what is eroded increases to ∼60% at all sites. Without pre-treatment baseline erosion rates, and additional post treatment LiDAR captures, it is difficult to quantify the treatment effectiveness. Our results offer insights in the erosion mechanisms within different geomorphic gully morphologies and rehabilitation effects in these erosional landforms. This study provides crucial knowledge of gully dynamics that can be coupled with other lines of evidence for better prioritisation of rehabilitation in the GBR catchments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48622,"journal":{"name":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 184-199"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000448/pdfft?md5=ae23cdae0a7cf585258ac004dc0ae6a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2095633923000448-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing gully erosion and rehabilitation using multi temporal LiDAR DEMs: Case study from the Great Barrier Reef catchments, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Sana Khan , Rebecca Bartley , Anne Kinsey-Henderson , Aaron Hawdon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Millions of dollars are being spent on gully rehabilitation to help reduce excess fine sediment delivery to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). There is an urgent need for (i) prioritisation of active gullies for rehabilitation and (ii) the development of methodologies to inform the effectiveness of remediation. In this study we analyse DEMs of Difference derived from 0.5 m resolution 2–3 year interval multi-temporal LiDAR data collected pre and post rehabilitation at three variable gully morphologies in the Burdekin catchment. Our analysis indicates that the highest annual average fine sediment erosion rates for the untreated control gullies occur at the linear gully (53.38 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) followed by linear-alluvial gully (34.24 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) and least at the alluvial gully (14.41 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>). The proportional loss or export of fine sediment from the gullies in their un-treated condition ranges from ∼68 to 90% of what is eroded, and when the gullies are treated the proportion of fine sediment that is retained in the gully proportional to what is eroded increases to ∼60% at all sites. Without pre-treatment baseline erosion rates, and additional post treatment LiDAR captures, it is difficult to quantify the treatment effectiveness. Our results offer insights in the erosion mechanisms within different geomorphic gully morphologies and rehabilitation effects in these erosional landforms. This study provides crucial knowledge of gully dynamics that can be coupled with other lines of evidence for better prioritisation of rehabilitation in the GBR catchments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Soil and Water Conservation Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 184-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000448/pdfft?md5=ae23cdae0a7cf585258ac004dc0ae6a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2095633923000448-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Soil and Water Conservation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000448\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000448","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing gully erosion and rehabilitation using multi temporal LiDAR DEMs: Case study from the Great Barrier Reef catchments, Australia
Millions of dollars are being spent on gully rehabilitation to help reduce excess fine sediment delivery to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). There is an urgent need for (i) prioritisation of active gullies for rehabilitation and (ii) the development of methodologies to inform the effectiveness of remediation. In this study we analyse DEMs of Difference derived from 0.5 m resolution 2–3 year interval multi-temporal LiDAR data collected pre and post rehabilitation at three variable gully morphologies in the Burdekin catchment. Our analysis indicates that the highest annual average fine sediment erosion rates for the untreated control gullies occur at the linear gully (53.38 t ha−1 y−1) followed by linear-alluvial gully (34.24 t ha−1 y−1) and least at the alluvial gully (14.41 t ha−1 y−1). The proportional loss or export of fine sediment from the gullies in their un-treated condition ranges from ∼68 to 90% of what is eroded, and when the gullies are treated the proportion of fine sediment that is retained in the gully proportional to what is eroded increases to ∼60% at all sites. Without pre-treatment baseline erosion rates, and additional post treatment LiDAR captures, it is difficult to quantify the treatment effectiveness. Our results offer insights in the erosion mechanisms within different geomorphic gully morphologies and rehabilitation effects in these erosional landforms. This study provides crucial knowledge of gully dynamics that can be coupled with other lines of evidence for better prioritisation of rehabilitation in the GBR catchments.
期刊介绍:
The International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR), the official journal of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) http://www.waswac.org, is a multidisciplinary journal of soil and water conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and promote the practice of soil and water conservation.
The scope of International Soil and Water Conservation Research includes research, strategies, and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection of soil and water resources. It deals with identification, characterization, and modeling; dynamic monitoring and evaluation; assessment and management of conservation practice and creation and implementation of quality standards.
Examples of appropriate topical areas include (but are not limited to):
• Conservation models, tools, and technologies
• Conservation agricultural
• Soil health resources, indicators, assessment, and management
• Land degradation
• Sustainable development
• Soil erosion and its control
• Soil erosion processes
• Water resources assessment and management
• Watershed management
• Soil erosion models
• Literature review on topics related soil and water conservation research