科学、教育和技术(S.E.T.):福祉功能的进步?

Q3 Social Sciences
Wan Lin, F. Vandamme
{"title":"科学、教育和技术(S.E.T.):福祉功能的进步?","authors":"Wan Lin, F. Vandamme","doi":"10.57028/s59-141-z1009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Indo-European Myths at the start we get the golden age. Here we get the highest level of security, wellbeing and welfare. The golden age is followed by the silver age, the bronze and finally the iron age. These ages are characterized by the introduction of more and more science, education and technology. The more of these the less security, wellbeing and welfare. This view is very explicit in the Greek and Roman mythology. In the work of J. J. Rousseau we find the same ideas. In the 14th century we see the reversal. It is believed that science, education and technology is the basic source of progress, wellbeing, security and welfare. In the 20th and 21th century this view is more and more questioned. Not that much the relevance of science, education and technology, but rather what type of these is needed, acceptable, relevant, applicable… This is the issue we bring forward in this contribution and the challenge of the adagium: “The more simplicity and the more transparency, the more security and safety for wellbeing and survival” as well as “Sophistication is a cover for hidden targets”?","PeriodicalId":36253,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science, education and technology (S.E.T.): progress in function of well-being?\",\"authors\":\"Wan Lin, F. Vandamme\",\"doi\":\"10.57028/s59-141-z1009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Indo-European Myths at the start we get the golden age. Here we get the highest level of security, wellbeing and welfare. The golden age is followed by the silver age, the bronze and finally the iron age. These ages are characterized by the introduction of more and more science, education and technology. The more of these the less security, wellbeing and welfare. This view is very explicit in the Greek and Roman mythology. In the work of J. J. Rousseau we find the same ideas. In the 14th century we see the reversal. It is believed that science, education and technology is the basic source of progress, wellbeing, security and welfare. In the 20th and 21th century this view is more and more questioned. Not that much the relevance of science, education and technology, but rather what type of these is needed, acceptable, relevant, applicable… This is the issue we bring forward in this contribution and the challenge of the adagium: “The more simplicity and the more transparency, the more security and safety for wellbeing and survival” as well as “Sophistication is a cover for hidden targets”?\",\"PeriodicalId\":36253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57028/s59-141-z1009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57028/s59-141-z1009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印欧神话的开端,我们得到了黄金时代。在这里,我们获得了最高水平的安全、福祉和福利。黄金时代之后是白银时代,青铜时代,最后是铁器时代。这些时代的特点是引入了越来越多的科学、教育和技术。这些人越多,安全感、幸福感和福利就越差。这种观点在希腊和罗马神话中非常明确。在卢梭的作品中,我们发现了同样的观点。在14世纪,我们看到了逆转。人们认为,科学、教育和技术是进步、福祉、安全和福利的基本来源。在20世纪和21世纪,这种观点受到越来越多的质疑。与其说是科学、教育和技术的相关性,不如说是需要什么类型的、可接受的、相关的,适用……这就是我们在这篇文章中提出的问题,也是阿达吉姆的挑战:“越简单、越透明,就越能保障福祉和生存”以及“复杂是隐藏目标的掩护”?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science, education and technology (S.E.T.): progress in function of well-being?
In the Indo-European Myths at the start we get the golden age. Here we get the highest level of security, wellbeing and welfare. The golden age is followed by the silver age, the bronze and finally the iron age. These ages are characterized by the introduction of more and more science, education and technology. The more of these the less security, wellbeing and welfare. This view is very explicit in the Greek and Roman mythology. In the work of J. J. Rousseau we find the same ideas. In the 14th century we see the reversal. It is believed that science, education and technology is the basic source of progress, wellbeing, security and welfare. In the 20th and 21th century this view is more and more questioned. Not that much the relevance of science, education and technology, but rather what type of these is needed, acceptable, relevant, applicable… This is the issue we bring forward in this contribution and the challenge of the adagium: “The more simplicity and the more transparency, the more security and safety for wellbeing and survival” as well as “Sophistication is a cover for hidden targets”?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis
Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信