{"title":"石灰和木质素磺酸盐改良膨胀土的循环膨胀收缩行为——实验定量与比较","authors":"G. Landlin , S. Bhuvaneshwari","doi":"10.1016/j.gete.2023.100440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The behaviour of expansive soils is majorly influenced by the mineralogy and the environmental conditions contributed by the seasonal moisture changes. Many structures found on the expansive soil depict severe distress due to the volume change behaviour of the soil. The volume changes correspond to moisture fluctuations which occur with the wetting–drying cycles associated with climatic variations. The wetting–drying cycles also impact the chemical treatment methods adopted to curtail swelling and shrinkage. The present study evaluates and compares the magnitude of swelling and shrinkage depicted by Lime and Lignosulphonate amended soils under wetting and drying cycles imposed under laboratory conditions. A specially modified oedometer apparatus was adopted to simulate the field drying conditions. The untreated soil exhibits higher swelling strain than the shrinkage strains with cycles of wetting and drying. There is a decrease of nearly 9% in swelling and 5% in shrinkage from the first cycle to steady state cycle. The swelling strain followed a decline to the steady state, however lime and LS amended soil depicted an initial decrease and then an increase in swelling strains before steady state. The treated and untreated soils also attain equilibrium characterized by different bandwidths and also exhibit difference in swelling and shrinkage rates, with untreated soil exhibiting a longer time to complete the swell-shrink cycles. The study further quantifies these variations for treated and untreated soil and the respective rates of primary and secondary swelling and shrinkage. The results are also justified with a physicochemical analysis of the leachate collected during the wetting–drying cycles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56008,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100440"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyclic swell shrink behaviour of lime and lignosulphonate amended expansive soil—An experimental quantification and comparison\",\"authors\":\"G. Landlin , S. Bhuvaneshwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gete.2023.100440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The behaviour of expansive soils is majorly influenced by the mineralogy and the environmental conditions contributed by the seasonal moisture changes. Many structures found on the expansive soil depict severe distress due to the volume change behaviour of the soil. The volume changes correspond to moisture fluctuations which occur with the wetting–drying cycles associated with climatic variations. The wetting–drying cycles also impact the chemical treatment methods adopted to curtail swelling and shrinkage. The present study evaluates and compares the magnitude of swelling and shrinkage depicted by Lime and Lignosulphonate amended soils under wetting and drying cycles imposed under laboratory conditions. A specially modified oedometer apparatus was adopted to simulate the field drying conditions. The untreated soil exhibits higher swelling strain than the shrinkage strains with cycles of wetting and drying. There is a decrease of nearly 9% in swelling and 5% in shrinkage from the first cycle to steady state cycle. The swelling strain followed a decline to the steady state, however lime and LS amended soil depicted an initial decrease and then an increase in swelling strains before steady state. The treated and untreated soils also attain equilibrium characterized by different bandwidths and also exhibit difference in swelling and shrinkage rates, with untreated soil exhibiting a longer time to complete the swell-shrink cycles. The study further quantifies these variations for treated and untreated soil and the respective rates of primary and secondary swelling and shrinkage. The results are also justified with a physicochemical analysis of the leachate collected during the wetting–drying cycles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380823000096\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380823000096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
膨胀土的行为主要受矿物学和季节性水分变化所带来的环境条件的影响。在膨胀土上发现的许多结构都因土壤的体积变化行为而受到严重破坏。体积变化与湿度波动相对应,而湿度波动是随着与气候变化相关的干湿循环而发生的。湿润-干燥周期也会影响为抑制膨胀和收缩而采用的化学处理方法。本研究评估并比较了石灰和木质素磺酸盐改良土壤在实验室湿润和干燥循环条件下的膨胀和收缩程度。为了模拟实地干燥条件,采用了一种经过特别改良的测土仪。未经处理的土壤在湿润和干燥循环中表现出的膨胀应变高于收缩应变。从第一个周期到稳定状态周期,膨胀应变降低了近 9%,收缩应变降低了 5%。膨胀应变在达到稳定状态后逐渐减小,而石灰和 LS 改良土壤的膨胀应变在达到稳定状态前则先减小后增大。处理过的土壤和未处理过的土壤在达到平衡时的带宽不同,膨胀和收缩速率也不同,未处理过的土壤完成膨胀-收缩循环的时间更长。研究进一步量化了经处理和未处理土壤的这些变化,以及各自的一次和二次膨胀和收缩率。在湿润-干燥循环过程中收集的沥滤液的物理化学分析也证明了这些结果的合理性。
Cyclic swell shrink behaviour of lime and lignosulphonate amended expansive soil—An experimental quantification and comparison
The behaviour of expansive soils is majorly influenced by the mineralogy and the environmental conditions contributed by the seasonal moisture changes. Many structures found on the expansive soil depict severe distress due to the volume change behaviour of the soil. The volume changes correspond to moisture fluctuations which occur with the wetting–drying cycles associated with climatic variations. The wetting–drying cycles also impact the chemical treatment methods adopted to curtail swelling and shrinkage. The present study evaluates and compares the magnitude of swelling and shrinkage depicted by Lime and Lignosulphonate amended soils under wetting and drying cycles imposed under laboratory conditions. A specially modified oedometer apparatus was adopted to simulate the field drying conditions. The untreated soil exhibits higher swelling strain than the shrinkage strains with cycles of wetting and drying. There is a decrease of nearly 9% in swelling and 5% in shrinkage from the first cycle to steady state cycle. The swelling strain followed a decline to the steady state, however lime and LS amended soil depicted an initial decrease and then an increase in swelling strains before steady state. The treated and untreated soils also attain equilibrium characterized by different bandwidths and also exhibit difference in swelling and shrinkage rates, with untreated soil exhibiting a longer time to complete the swell-shrink cycles. The study further quantifies these variations for treated and untreated soil and the respective rates of primary and secondary swelling and shrinkage. The results are also justified with a physicochemical analysis of the leachate collected during the wetting–drying cycles.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal is to publish research results of the highest quality and of lasting importance on the subject of geomechanics, with the focus on applications to geological energy production and storage, and the interaction of soils and rocks with the natural and engineered environment. Special attention is given to concepts and developments of new energy geotechnologies that comprise intrinsic mechanisms protecting the environment against a potential engineering induced damage, hence warranting sustainable usage of energy resources.
The scope of the journal is broad, including fundamental concepts in geomechanics and mechanics of porous media, the experiments and analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Of special interest are issues resulting from coupling of particular physics, chemistry and biology of external forcings, as well as of pore fluid/gas and minerals to the solid mechanics of the medium skeleton and pore fluid mechanics. The multi-scale and inter-scale interactions between the phenomena and the behavior representations are also of particular interest. Contributions to general theoretical approach to these issues, but of potential reference to geomechanics in its context of energy and the environment are also most welcome.