蜂蜜和克曲唑乳膏治疗外阴阴道念珠菌感染的疗效比较:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 0.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
M. Mirghafourvand, Zahra Mollazadeh-Narestan, Parisa Yavarikia, Sepideh Mashayekh-Amiri, P. Gholizadeh
{"title":"蜂蜜和克曲唑乳膏治疗外阴阴道念珠菌感染的疗效比较:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"M. Mirghafourvand, Zahra Mollazadeh-Narestan, Parisa Yavarikia, Sepideh Mashayekh-Amiri, P. Gholizadeh","doi":"10.2174/1574885518666221221085942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nVulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common fungal infection of the vaginal area affecting 75% of women at least once in their lifetime. However, there is no clear evidence helping to choose the most effective treatment method to improve the symptoms of VVC.\n\n\n\nThe objective of this study was to compare the effect of using honey with clotrimazole on the treatment of symptoms of VVC.\n\n\n\nAll databases in English (Embase, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and Persian (Irandoc, SID, and Magiran) were searched without time limitation. Evaluation of studies in terms of bias was performed using the Cochrane handbook. Four clinical trials were included in the present systematic review; however, only three of them were included in the meta-analysis.\n\n\n\nThe results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the rate of positive culture after treatment (RR: 2.35; 95%CI: 1.45 to 3.82) was significantly higher in the honey group than in the clotrimazole one. The frequency of itching after treatment (RR: 0.25, 95%CI: 0.12 to 0.49) was significantly lower in the honey-receiving group than in the clotrimazole one. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of other symptoms of VVC, including vaginal discharge (RR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.02 to 2.75), vaginal burning (RR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.03 to 3.80) and dyspareunia (RR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.27 to 1.50) between groups.\n\n\n\nDue to the low quality of the studies, more clinical trial studies with stronger designs in this field are needed to clearly identify the therapeutic effects of honey on improving the symptoms of VVC.\n","PeriodicalId":11004,"journal":{"name":"Current Drug Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Efficacy of Honey and Clotrimazole Cream in the Vulvovaginal Candidiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Mirghafourvand, Zahra Mollazadeh-Narestan, Parisa Yavarikia, Sepideh Mashayekh-Amiri, P. Gholizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1574885518666221221085942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nVulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common fungal infection of the vaginal area affecting 75% of women at least once in their lifetime. However, there is no clear evidence helping to choose the most effective treatment method to improve the symptoms of VVC.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe objective of this study was to compare the effect of using honey with clotrimazole on the treatment of symptoms of VVC.\\n\\n\\n\\nAll databases in English (Embase, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and Persian (Irandoc, SID, and Magiran) were searched without time limitation. Evaluation of studies in terms of bias was performed using the Cochrane handbook. Four clinical trials were included in the present systematic review; however, only three of them were included in the meta-analysis.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the rate of positive culture after treatment (RR: 2.35; 95%CI: 1.45 to 3.82) was significantly higher in the honey group than in the clotrimazole one. The frequency of itching after treatment (RR: 0.25, 95%CI: 0.12 to 0.49) was significantly lower in the honey-receiving group than in the clotrimazole one. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of other symptoms of VVC, including vaginal discharge (RR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.02 to 2.75), vaginal burning (RR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.03 to 3.80) and dyspareunia (RR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.27 to 1.50) between groups.\\n\\n\\n\\nDue to the low quality of the studies, more clinical trial studies with stronger designs in this field are needed to clearly identify the therapeutic effects of honey on improving the symptoms of VVC.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Drug Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Drug Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574885518666221221085942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Drug Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574885518666221221085942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外阴阴道念珠菌感染(VVC)是一种常见的阴道真菌感染,75%的女性一生中至少感染一次。然而没有明确的证据可以帮助选择最有效的治疗方法来改善VVC的症状。本研究的目的是比较蜂蜜和克霉唑对VVC症状的治疗效果。所有英文数据库(Embase、MEDLINE、ProQuest、Google Scholar、Scopus、Cochrane Library和Web of Science)和波斯语数据库(Irandoc、SID和Magiran)在没有时间限制的情况下进行搜索。使用Cochrane手册对研究的偏倚进行评估。本系统综述包括四项临床试验;荟萃分析结果表明,蜂蜜组治疗后培养阳性率(RR:2.35;95%CI:1.45~3.82)显著高于克霉唑组。蜂蜜接受组治疗后瘙痒的频率(RR:0.25,95%CI:0.12-0.49)显著低于克霉唑组。然而,VVC的其他症状,包括阴道分泌物(RR:0.26,95%CI:0.02至2.75)、阴道灼热(RR:0.35,95%CI:0.03至3.80)和性交困难(RR:0.64,95%CI:0.27至1.50)的发生率在各组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。由于研究质量低,需要在该领域进行更多设计更强的临床试验研究,以明确蜂蜜对改善VVC症状的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Efficacy of Honey and Clotrimazole Cream in the Vulvovaginal Candidiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common fungal infection of the vaginal area affecting 75% of women at least once in their lifetime. However, there is no clear evidence helping to choose the most effective treatment method to improve the symptoms of VVC. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of using honey with clotrimazole on the treatment of symptoms of VVC. All databases in English (Embase, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and Persian (Irandoc, SID, and Magiran) were searched without time limitation. Evaluation of studies in terms of bias was performed using the Cochrane handbook. Four clinical trials were included in the present systematic review; however, only three of them were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the rate of positive culture after treatment (RR: 2.35; 95%CI: 1.45 to 3.82) was significantly higher in the honey group than in the clotrimazole one. The frequency of itching after treatment (RR: 0.25, 95%CI: 0.12 to 0.49) was significantly lower in the honey-receiving group than in the clotrimazole one. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of other symptoms of VVC, including vaginal discharge (RR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.02 to 2.75), vaginal burning (RR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.03 to 3.80) and dyspareunia (RR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.27 to 1.50) between groups. Due to the low quality of the studies, more clinical trial studies with stronger designs in this field are needed to clearly identify the therapeutic effects of honey on improving the symptoms of VVC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Drug Therapy
Current Drug Therapy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Current Drug Therapy publishes frontier reviews of high quality on all the latest advances in drug therapy covering: new and existing drugs, therapies and medical devices. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信