中国大陆IMERG、TMPA、ERA5和CPC降水产物的时空模式和极值评估

IF 3.7 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Shan-hu Jiang , Lin-yong Wei , Li-liang Ren , Lin-qi Zhang , Meng-hao Wang , Hao Cui
{"title":"中国大陆IMERG、TMPA、ERA5和CPC降水产物的时空模式和极值评估","authors":"Shan-hu Jiang ,&nbsp;Lin-yong Wei ,&nbsp;Li-liang Ren ,&nbsp;Lin-qi Zhang ,&nbsp;Meng-hao Wang ,&nbsp;Hao Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.wse.2022.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A comprehensive assessment of representative satellite-retrieved (Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA)), reanalysis-based (fifth generation of atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ERA5)), and gauge-estimated (Climate Prediction Center (CPC)) precipitation products was conducted using the data from 807 meteorological stations across mainland China from 2001 to 2017. Error statistical metrics, precipitation distribution functions, and extreme precipitation indices were used to evaluate the quality of the four precipitation products in terms of multi-timescale accuracy and extreme precipitation estimation. When the timescale increased from daily to seasonal scales, the accuracy of the four precipitation products first increased and then decreased, and all products performed best on the monthly timescale. Their accuracy ranking in descending order was CPC, IMERG, TMPA, and ERA5 on the daily timescale and IMERG, CPC, TMPA, and ERA5 on the monthly and seasonal timescales. IMERG was generally superior to its predecessor TMPA on the three timescales. ERA5 exhibited large statistical errors. CPC provided stable estimated values. For extreme precipitation estimation, the quality of IMERG was relatively consistent with that of TMPA in terms of precipitation distribution and extreme metrics, and IMERG exhibited a significant advantage in estimating moderate and heavy precipitation. In contrast, ERA5 and CPC exhibited poor performance with large systematic underestimation biases. The findings of this study provide insight into the performance of the latest IMERG product compared with the widely used TMPA, ERA5, and CPC datasets, and points to possible directions for improvement of multi-source precipitation data fusion algorithms in order to better serve hydrological applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23628,"journal":{"name":"Water science and engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 45-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of IMERG, TMPA, ERA5, and CPC precipitation products over mainland China: Spatiotemporal patterns and extremes\",\"authors\":\"Shan-hu Jiang ,&nbsp;Lin-yong Wei ,&nbsp;Li-liang Ren ,&nbsp;Lin-qi Zhang ,&nbsp;Meng-hao Wang ,&nbsp;Hao Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wse.2022.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A comprehensive assessment of representative satellite-retrieved (Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA)), reanalysis-based (fifth generation of atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ERA5)), and gauge-estimated (Climate Prediction Center (CPC)) precipitation products was conducted using the data from 807 meteorological stations across mainland China from 2001 to 2017. Error statistical metrics, precipitation distribution functions, and extreme precipitation indices were used to evaluate the quality of the four precipitation products in terms of multi-timescale accuracy and extreme precipitation estimation. When the timescale increased from daily to seasonal scales, the accuracy of the four precipitation products first increased and then decreased, and all products performed best on the monthly timescale. Their accuracy ranking in descending order was CPC, IMERG, TMPA, and ERA5 on the daily timescale and IMERG, CPC, TMPA, and ERA5 on the monthly and seasonal timescales. IMERG was generally superior to its predecessor TMPA on the three timescales. ERA5 exhibited large statistical errors. CPC provided stable estimated values. For extreme precipitation estimation, the quality of IMERG was relatively consistent with that of TMPA in terms of precipitation distribution and extreme metrics, and IMERG exhibited a significant advantage in estimating moderate and heavy precipitation. In contrast, ERA5 and CPC exhibited poor performance with large systematic underestimation biases. The findings of this study provide insight into the performance of the latest IMERG product compared with the widely used TMPA, ERA5, and CPC datasets, and points to possible directions for improvement of multi-source precipitation data fusion algorithms in order to better serve hydrological applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water science and engineering\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 45-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water science and engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237022000394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water science and engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237022000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

基于再分析(欧洲中期天气预报中心(ERA5)的第五代大气再分析)的代表性卫星检索(全球降水测量综合多卫星检索(IMERG)和热带降雨测量任务多卫星降水分析(TMPA))的综合评估;利用2001 - 2017年中国大陆807个气象站的数据,进行了气候预测中心(CPC)降水产品的计量估算。利用误差统计指标、降水分布函数和极端降水指数对4种降水产品的多时间尺度精度和极端降水估计质量进行了评价。当时间尺度从日尺度增加到季节尺度时,4种降水产品的精度均呈现先上升后下降的趋势,且均在月尺度上表现最好。其准确度在日尺度上依次为CPC、IMERG、TMPA、ERA5,在月尺度和季节尺度上依次为IMERG、CPC、TMPA、ERA5。在三个时间尺度上,IMERG总体上优于其前身TMPA。ERA5表现出较大的统计误差。CPC提供稳定的估计值。在极端降水估计中,IMERG在降水分布和极端指标方面与TMPA质量相对一致,在估计中、强降水方面具有显著优势。相比之下,ERA5和CPC表现出较差的表现,存在较大的系统低估偏差。本研究结果为最新IMERG产品与广泛使用的TMPA、ERA5和CPC数据集的性能对比提供了深入的见解,并指出了改进多源降水数据融合算法以更好地服务于水文应用的可能方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of IMERG, TMPA, ERA5, and CPC precipitation products over mainland China: Spatiotemporal patterns and extremes

A comprehensive assessment of representative satellite-retrieved (Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA)), reanalysis-based (fifth generation of atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ERA5)), and gauge-estimated (Climate Prediction Center (CPC)) precipitation products was conducted using the data from 807 meteorological stations across mainland China from 2001 to 2017. Error statistical metrics, precipitation distribution functions, and extreme precipitation indices were used to evaluate the quality of the four precipitation products in terms of multi-timescale accuracy and extreme precipitation estimation. When the timescale increased from daily to seasonal scales, the accuracy of the four precipitation products first increased and then decreased, and all products performed best on the monthly timescale. Their accuracy ranking in descending order was CPC, IMERG, TMPA, and ERA5 on the daily timescale and IMERG, CPC, TMPA, and ERA5 on the monthly and seasonal timescales. IMERG was generally superior to its predecessor TMPA on the three timescales. ERA5 exhibited large statistical errors. CPC provided stable estimated values. For extreme precipitation estimation, the quality of IMERG was relatively consistent with that of TMPA in terms of precipitation distribution and extreme metrics, and IMERG exhibited a significant advantage in estimating moderate and heavy precipitation. In contrast, ERA5 and CPC exhibited poor performance with large systematic underestimation biases. The findings of this study provide insight into the performance of the latest IMERG product compared with the widely used TMPA, ERA5, and CPC datasets, and points to possible directions for improvement of multi-source precipitation data fusion algorithms in order to better serve hydrological applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
573
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Science and Engineering journal is an international, peer-reviewed research publication covering new concepts, theories, methods, and techniques related to water issues. The journal aims to publish research that helps advance the theoretical and practical understanding of water resources, aquatic environment, aquatic ecology, and water engineering, with emphases placed on the innovation and applicability of science and technology in large-scale hydropower project construction, large river and lake regulation, inter-basin water transfer, hydroelectric energy development, ecological restoration, the development of new materials, and sustainable utilization of water resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信