回顾性观察研究比较两种再灌注策略在急性STEMI患者就诊时间以外

Q4 Medicine
D. Lee, K. Chan, M. Lee, Eric C.Y. Wong
{"title":"回顾性观察研究比较两种再灌注策略在急性STEMI患者就诊时间以外","authors":"D. Lee, K. Chan, M. Lee, Eric C.Y. Wong","doi":"10.55503/2790-6744.1494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : A pilot cluster-based 24-hour primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) service in a phased expansion program was launched in October 2018. This study aimed to compare the 30-day mortality and major bleeding event in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting outside of fi ce hours who received historical thrombolytic therapy and PPCI under the newly implemented 24-hour service model. Methods and results : A single center retrospective study was conducted on consecutive STEMI patients presenting outside of fi ce hours, who received urgent thrombolytic therapy or PPCI between 2016-2019. The primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and major bleeding event. The secondary endpoints were thrombolytic failure rate and hospital length of stay. A total of 331 patients were analyzed. 30-day mortality occurred in 11.7% in thrombolytic group and 4.2% in PPCI group ( P ¼ .02). Major bleeding events occurred in 8% in thrombolytic group and 2.1% in PPCI group ( P ¼ .02). Multivariate analysis identi fi ed age ≥ 75 as an independent factor associated with major outcomes. Thrombolytic failure occurred in 31.4% of patients. The median lengths of stay were not different between the two groups (5 vs 4 days, P ¼ .29). Conclusions : Compared with thrombolytic therapy, PPCI in patients with acute STEMI presenting outside of fi ce hours is associated with lower risks of 30-day mortality and major bleeding event. Age ≥ 75 was an independent risk factor associated with mortality and bleeding outcome.","PeriodicalId":53534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective observational study comparing two reperfusion strategies in patients with acute STEMI presenting outside office hours\",\"authors\":\"D. Lee, K. Chan, M. Lee, Eric C.Y. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.55503/2790-6744.1494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction : A pilot cluster-based 24-hour primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) service in a phased expansion program was launched in October 2018. This study aimed to compare the 30-day mortality and major bleeding event in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting outside of fi ce hours who received historical thrombolytic therapy and PPCI under the newly implemented 24-hour service model. Methods and results : A single center retrospective study was conducted on consecutive STEMI patients presenting outside of fi ce hours, who received urgent thrombolytic therapy or PPCI between 2016-2019. The primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and major bleeding event. The secondary endpoints were thrombolytic failure rate and hospital length of stay. A total of 331 patients were analyzed. 30-day mortality occurred in 11.7% in thrombolytic group and 4.2% in PPCI group ( P ¼ .02). Major bleeding events occurred in 8% in thrombolytic group and 2.1% in PPCI group ( P ¼ .02). Multivariate analysis identi fi ed age ≥ 75 as an independent factor associated with major outcomes. Thrombolytic failure occurred in 31.4% of patients. The median lengths of stay were not different between the two groups (5 vs 4 days, P ¼ .29). Conclusions : Compared with thrombolytic therapy, PPCI in patients with acute STEMI presenting outside of fi ce hours is associated with lower risks of 30-day mortality and major bleeding event. Age ≥ 75 was an independent risk factor associated with mortality and bleeding outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55503/2790-6744.1494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55503/2790-6744.1494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018年10月,一项基于集群的24小时初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)试点服务在分阶段扩展计划中启动。本研究旨在比较在新实施的24小时服务模式下,急性st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在5小时以外接受历史溶栓治疗和PPCI的30天死亡率和大出血事件。方法和结果:在2016-2019年期间,对在5小时以外就诊并接受紧急溶栓治疗或PPCI的连续STEMI患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。主要终点为30天死亡率和大出血事件。次要终点是溶栓失败率和住院时间。共分析331例患者。溶栓组30天死亡率为11.7%,PPCI组为4.2% (P < 0.05)。溶栓组大出血发生率为8%,PPCI组为2.1% (P < 0.05)。多因素分析确定年龄≥75岁是与主要结局相关的独立因素。31.4%的患者发生溶栓失败。两组患者的中位住院时间没有差异(5天vs 4天,P .29)。结论:与溶栓治疗相比,急性STEMI患者在5小时外出现PPCI与30天死亡率和大出血事件的风险较低相关。年龄≥75岁是与死亡率和出血结局相关的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective observational study comparing two reperfusion strategies in patients with acute STEMI presenting outside office hours
Introduction : A pilot cluster-based 24-hour primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) service in a phased expansion program was launched in October 2018. This study aimed to compare the 30-day mortality and major bleeding event in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting outside of fi ce hours who received historical thrombolytic therapy and PPCI under the newly implemented 24-hour service model. Methods and results : A single center retrospective study was conducted on consecutive STEMI patients presenting outside of fi ce hours, who received urgent thrombolytic therapy or PPCI between 2016-2019. The primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and major bleeding event. The secondary endpoints were thrombolytic failure rate and hospital length of stay. A total of 331 patients were analyzed. 30-day mortality occurred in 11.7% in thrombolytic group and 4.2% in PPCI group ( P ¼ .02). Major bleeding events occurred in 8% in thrombolytic group and 2.1% in PPCI group ( P ¼ .02). Multivariate analysis identi fi ed age ≥ 75 as an independent factor associated with major outcomes. Thrombolytic failure occurred in 31.4% of patients. The median lengths of stay were not different between the two groups (5 vs 4 days, P ¼ .29). Conclusions : Compared with thrombolytic therapy, PPCI in patients with acute STEMI presenting outside of fi ce hours is associated with lower risks of 30-day mortality and major bleeding event. Age ≥ 75 was an independent risk factor associated with mortality and bleeding outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology
Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, review articles and experimental investigations. As official journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology, the journal publishes abstracts of reports to be presented at the Scientific Sessions of the College as well as reports of the College-sponsored conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信