探索毅力、自我反思和洞察力与焦虑:一项对物理治疗博士学生的多地点研究

E. Costello, K. Huhn, William E. Healey, M. Hilliard, Margaret M Plack, Joyce R. Maring
{"title":"探索毅力、自我反思和洞察力与焦虑:一项对物理治疗博士学生的多地点研究","authors":"E. Costello, K. Huhn, William E. Healey, M. Hilliard, Margaret M Plack, Joyce R. Maring","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Introduction. Physical therapist education is rigorous and challenging and reports of mental health concerns in college-aged students continue to rise. Review of Literature. Although the association between student mental health and behavioral characteristics has garnered interest, few researchers have examined the relationship across educational programs and years of study. This study aimed to investigate grit, self-reflection, and anxiety in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 535 DPT students (years 1, 2, 3) enrolled in 3 programs were invited to complete a demographic survey, Grit scale (Grit-S), State portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), and Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS). Data analysis summarized demographic variables and survey scores and explored differences and associations among schools, years of study, and demographic variables. Results. Two hundred fifty-four students (72.7% female; 76.8% Caucasian; 70.9% aged 20–25 years) participated; response rate of 47.5%. Mean survey scores for Grit-S (3.73; ± .52), SRIS composite (92.01; ± 12.54), and STAI-S (41.94; ± 11.66) showed no meaningful differences among schools. Grit scale scores were lowest in the second year and highest in year 3. Female participants scored higher than male participants on the SRIS engagement subscale. Higher Grit-S scores were associated with lower anxiety scores and higher composite SRIS scores. Higher SRIS composite scores were associated with less anxious students. Anxiety scores were inversely related to insight scores. Discussion. Doctor of Physical Therapy student grit scores were generally consistent with published means for health professional students. Self-Reflection and Insight Scale scores for DPT students were higher than nursing and medical students. Students exhibited higher state anxiety scores compared with the general population. Grit Scale changes over time may reflect curricular experiences and growing sense of competence. Relationships among grit, self-reflection, and anxiety may represent an important finding with potential to prompt proactive interventions or support. Further research is needed to understand the impact of demographic factors.","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"36 1","pages":"196 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of Grit, Self-Reflection and Insight, and Anxiety: A Multisite Study of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students\",\"authors\":\"E. Costello, K. Huhn, William E. Healey, M. Hilliard, Margaret M Plack, Joyce R. Maring\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Introduction. Physical therapist education is rigorous and challenging and reports of mental health concerns in college-aged students continue to rise. Review of Literature. Although the association between student mental health and behavioral characteristics has garnered interest, few researchers have examined the relationship across educational programs and years of study. This study aimed to investigate grit, self-reflection, and anxiety in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 535 DPT students (years 1, 2, 3) enrolled in 3 programs were invited to complete a demographic survey, Grit scale (Grit-S), State portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), and Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS). Data analysis summarized demographic variables and survey scores and explored differences and associations among schools, years of study, and demographic variables. Results. Two hundred fifty-four students (72.7% female; 76.8% Caucasian; 70.9% aged 20–25 years) participated; response rate of 47.5%. Mean survey scores for Grit-S (3.73; ± .52), SRIS composite (92.01; ± 12.54), and STAI-S (41.94; ± 11.66) showed no meaningful differences among schools. Grit scale scores were lowest in the second year and highest in year 3. Female participants scored higher than male participants on the SRIS engagement subscale. Higher Grit-S scores were associated with lower anxiety scores and higher composite SRIS scores. Higher SRIS composite scores were associated with less anxious students. Anxiety scores were inversely related to insight scores. Discussion. Doctor of Physical Therapy student grit scores were generally consistent with published means for health professional students. Self-Reflection and Insight Scale scores for DPT students were higher than nursing and medical students. Students exhibited higher state anxiety scores compared with the general population. Grit Scale changes over time may reflect curricular experiences and growing sense of competence. Relationships among grit, self-reflection, and anxiety may represent an important finding with potential to prompt proactive interventions or support. Further research is needed to understand the impact of demographic factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"196 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

补充数字内容可在文本中获得。介绍。物理治疗师教育是严格和具有挑战性的,关于大学生心理健康问题的报道不断增加。文献回顾。尽管学生心理健康和行为特征之间的联系引起了人们的兴趣,但很少有研究人员研究了跨教育项目和多年学习的关系。本研究旨在探讨物理治疗博士(DPT)学生的勇气、自我反省和焦虑。方法。在本横断面研究中,535名DPT学生(1年级,2年级,3年级)参加了3个项目,被邀请完成人口统计调查,Grit量表(Grit- s),状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI-S)的状态部分,以及自我反思和洞察力量表(SRIS)。数据分析总结了人口变量和调查分数,并探讨了学校、学习年限和人口变量之间的差异和联系。结果。254名学生(72.7%为女生);76.8%的白人;70.9%(20-25岁)参与;应答率为47.5%。Grit-S的平均调查得分为3.73;±0.52),SRIS综合指数(92.01;±12.54),stan - s (41.94;±11.66),学校间差异无统计学意义。坚毅量表得分在第二年最低,在第三年最高。女性参与者在SRIS投入子量表上的得分高于男性参与者。较高的Grit-S评分与较低的焦虑评分和较高的综合SRIS评分相关。SRIS综合得分越高,学生的焦虑程度越低。焦虑得分与洞察力得分呈负相关。讨论。物理治疗博士学生的毅力得分与卫生专业学生的公布数据基本一致。DPT学生的自我反思和洞察力得分高于护理和医学生。与一般人群相比,学生表现出更高的状态焦虑得分。毅力量表随时间的变化可能反映了课程经历和不断增长的能力感。勇气、自我反省和焦虑之间的关系可能是一个重要的发现,有可能促使积极的干预或支持。需要进一步研究以了解人口因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of Grit, Self-Reflection and Insight, and Anxiety: A Multisite Study of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Introduction. Physical therapist education is rigorous and challenging and reports of mental health concerns in college-aged students continue to rise. Review of Literature. Although the association between student mental health and behavioral characteristics has garnered interest, few researchers have examined the relationship across educational programs and years of study. This study aimed to investigate grit, self-reflection, and anxiety in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 535 DPT students (years 1, 2, 3) enrolled in 3 programs were invited to complete a demographic survey, Grit scale (Grit-S), State portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), and Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS). Data analysis summarized demographic variables and survey scores and explored differences and associations among schools, years of study, and demographic variables. Results. Two hundred fifty-four students (72.7% female; 76.8% Caucasian; 70.9% aged 20–25 years) participated; response rate of 47.5%. Mean survey scores for Grit-S (3.73; ± .52), SRIS composite (92.01; ± 12.54), and STAI-S (41.94; ± 11.66) showed no meaningful differences among schools. Grit scale scores were lowest in the second year and highest in year 3. Female participants scored higher than male participants on the SRIS engagement subscale. Higher Grit-S scores were associated with lower anxiety scores and higher composite SRIS scores. Higher SRIS composite scores were associated with less anxious students. Anxiety scores were inversely related to insight scores. Discussion. Doctor of Physical Therapy student grit scores were generally consistent with published means for health professional students. Self-Reflection and Insight Scale scores for DPT students were higher than nursing and medical students. Students exhibited higher state anxiety scores compared with the general population. Grit Scale changes over time may reflect curricular experiences and growing sense of competence. Relationships among grit, self-reflection, and anxiety may represent an important finding with potential to prompt proactive interventions or support. Further research is needed to understand the impact of demographic factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信