Milan Bobek, Eva Höschlová
{"title":"Možnosti diagnostiky tvořivosti a vývoj nového sebeposuzovacího nástroje: Creatixo Inventory","authors":"Milan Bobek, Eva Höschlová","doi":"10.14712/23366486.2021.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we discuss some limits of methods being used most frequently for testing creativity and describe the process of developing a new diagnostic tool – a self-reporting inventory of creativity and innovativeness based on a complex set of skills and competencies identified in the review of existing research, relevant literature, and available diagnostic tools. Our complex applied creativity construct involves imagination, idea creation, openness, flexibility, and features like braveness, analytical skills, assertiveness, and even empathy, which are all necessary to transform a new idea into practical application beneficial for a company or society. We first gained data from 125 respondents and analyzed the structure of the first version of the questionnaire (reduction from 80 to 77 items had to be done based on correlation analysis). Then we undertook a series of exploratory factor analyses. After the iterative process of eliminating all the items with low loadings or problematic cross-loadings, we suggested the six-factor solution for the new, second version of the Creatixo inventory consisting of 47 items. On the new sample of 106 respondents confirmatory factor analysis supported the six-factor structure of the inventory (GOF indices: CFI = .990, GFI = .909, RMSEA = .025, SRMR = 0.101). The Creatixo tool has shown good results in internal consistency measures – e.g., McDonald's omega of all individual factors varies from .740 to .887. Now we are about to gather the bigger sample of the quota-representative population and cross-validate the psychometric analysis current outputs. We discuss the further validation studies and some limits of the self-reporting inventory approach to assessing creativity, innovativeness, and productivity.","PeriodicalId":31843,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie pro Praxi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie pro Praxi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366486.2021.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了测试创造力最常用方法的一些局限性,并描述了开发一种新的诊断工具的过程——一种基于现有研究、相关文献和可用诊断工具中确定的一套复杂技能和能力的创造力和创新性自我报告清单。我们复杂的应用创造力结构包括想象力、创意、开放性、灵活性,以及勇敢、分析能力、自信甚至同理心等特征,这些都是将新想法转化为对公司或社会有益的实际应用所必需的。我们首先从125名受访者中获得数据,并分析了第一版问卷的结构(根据相关分析,必须将80项减少到77项)。然后我们进行了一系列探索性因素分析。在消除所有低加载或有问题的交叉加载项目的迭代过程之后,我们为包含47个项目的Creatixo库存的新第二版本提出了六因素解决方案。对106名新样本进行验证性因子分析,支持量表的六因子结构(GOF指数:CFI = 0.990, GFI = 0.909, RMSEA = 0.025, SRMR = 0.101)。Creatixo工具在内部一致性测量中显示出良好的结果——例如,麦当劳的所有个体因素的omega从0.740到0.887不等。现在,我们将收集更大的配额代表性人群样本,并交叉验证心理测量分析的当前输出。我们讨论了进一步的验证研究和自我报告库存方法评估创造力,创新性和生产力的一些限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Možnosti diagnostiky tvořivosti a vývoj nového sebeposuzovacího nástroje: Creatixo Inventory
In this article, we discuss some limits of methods being used most frequently for testing creativity and describe the process of developing a new diagnostic tool – a self-reporting inventory of creativity and innovativeness based on a complex set of skills and competencies identified in the review of existing research, relevant literature, and available diagnostic tools. Our complex applied creativity construct involves imagination, idea creation, openness, flexibility, and features like braveness, analytical skills, assertiveness, and even empathy, which are all necessary to transform a new idea into practical application beneficial for a company or society. We first gained data from 125 respondents and analyzed the structure of the first version of the questionnaire (reduction from 80 to 77 items had to be done based on correlation analysis). Then we undertook a series of exploratory factor analyses. After the iterative process of eliminating all the items with low loadings or problematic cross-loadings, we suggested the six-factor solution for the new, second version of the Creatixo inventory consisting of 47 items. On the new sample of 106 respondents confirmatory factor analysis supported the six-factor structure of the inventory (GOF indices: CFI = .990, GFI = .909, RMSEA = .025, SRMR = 0.101). The Creatixo tool has shown good results in internal consistency measures – e.g., McDonald's omega of all individual factors varies from .740 to .887. Now we are about to gather the bigger sample of the quota-representative population and cross-validate the psychometric analysis current outputs. We discuss the further validation studies and some limits of the self-reporting inventory approach to assessing creativity, innovativeness, and productivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书