Jaén大学医院最近5年的结果

M.A. Jurado-Anillo
{"title":"Jaén大学医院最近5年的结果","authors":"M.A. Jurado-Anillo","doi":"10.15568/am.2021.814.or01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The main aim of our study is to know the percentage of success of otosclerosis surgery in our center. We have assessed it by calculating the post surgical air-bone gap from pure tone audiometries which were realised one year after the surgery. In addition, we have also estimated if there are differences between stapedectomy and stapedotomy procedures as well as possible complications such as new hearing loss at high frequencies or percentage of hearing aid needed after surgery.\nMethods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out with a total of 45 ears. All of them were diagnosed with otosclerosis and treated at the ENT department of Hospital Universitario de Jaén from 2015 to 2019. In our study, we have considered two cohorts depending on the procedure used, either stapedotomy or stapedectomy. Afterwards, a pure tone audiometry was performed one year after the surgery and the post- surgical air-bone gap was calculated, estimating the pure tone average from both air and bone postsurgical conduction.\nResults: Surgery success (air-bone gap <20dB) was achieved in 90.3% of the cases using stapedectomy technique while a 85.7% with stapedotomy technique. Altogether, considering both groups, the success of the surgery was 88.9%. There were no statistically significant differences between both techniques.\nConclusions: After the results of our study, we can affirm that stapedotomy and stapedectomy have similar success rates in terms of decreasing the post-surgical air-bone gap and achieving clinical improvement of hearing, showing no statistically significant differences between them.","PeriodicalId":86333,"journal":{"name":"Actualidad medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Otosclerosis surgery: results of the last 5 years of the University Hospital of Jaén\",\"authors\":\"M.A. Jurado-Anillo\",\"doi\":\"10.15568/am.2021.814.or01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The main aim of our study is to know the percentage of success of otosclerosis surgery in our center. We have assessed it by calculating the post surgical air-bone gap from pure tone audiometries which were realised one year after the surgery. In addition, we have also estimated if there are differences between stapedectomy and stapedotomy procedures as well as possible complications such as new hearing loss at high frequencies or percentage of hearing aid needed after surgery.\\nMethods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out with a total of 45 ears. All of them were diagnosed with otosclerosis and treated at the ENT department of Hospital Universitario de Jaén from 2015 to 2019. In our study, we have considered two cohorts depending on the procedure used, either stapedotomy or stapedectomy. Afterwards, a pure tone audiometry was performed one year after the surgery and the post- surgical air-bone gap was calculated, estimating the pure tone average from both air and bone postsurgical conduction.\\nResults: Surgery success (air-bone gap <20dB) was achieved in 90.3% of the cases using stapedectomy technique while a 85.7% with stapedotomy technique. Altogether, considering both groups, the success of the surgery was 88.9%. There were no statistically significant differences between both techniques.\\nConclusions: After the results of our study, we can affirm that stapedotomy and stapedectomy have similar success rates in terms of decreasing the post-surgical air-bone gap and achieving clinical improvement of hearing, showing no statistically significant differences between them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":86333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actualidad medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actualidad medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15568/am.2021.814.or01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actualidad medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15568/am.2021.814.or01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解我院耳硬化手术的成功率。我们通过纯音听力学计算术后气骨间隙来评估它,这是在手术一年后实现的。此外,我们还估计了镫骨切除术和镫骨切除术之间是否存在差异,以及可能出现的并发症,如高频新听力损失或术后需要助听器的百分比。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,共45耳。所有患者均被诊断为耳硬化,并于2015年至2019年在贾文森大学医院耳鼻喉科接受治疗。在我们的研究中,根据所使用的手术,我们考虑了两个队列,要么是镫骨切除术,要么是镫骨切除术。术后一年进行纯音测听,计算术后气骨间隙,估计术后气骨传导的纯音平均值。结果:镫骨切除术手术成功率(气骨间隙<20dB)为90.3%,镫骨切除术手术成功率为85.7%。两组患者手术成功率合计为88.9%。两种方法间无统计学差异。结论:根据我们的研究结果,我们可以肯定镫骨切除术和镫骨切除术在缩小术后气骨间隙和改善临床听力方面的成功率相似,两者之间无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Otosclerosis surgery: results of the last 5 years of the University Hospital of Jaén
Objectives: The main aim of our study is to know the percentage of success of otosclerosis surgery in our center. We have assessed it by calculating the post surgical air-bone gap from pure tone audiometries which were realised one year after the surgery. In addition, we have also estimated if there are differences between stapedectomy and stapedotomy procedures as well as possible complications such as new hearing loss at high frequencies or percentage of hearing aid needed after surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out with a total of 45 ears. All of them were diagnosed with otosclerosis and treated at the ENT department of Hospital Universitario de Jaén from 2015 to 2019. In our study, we have considered two cohorts depending on the procedure used, either stapedotomy or stapedectomy. Afterwards, a pure tone audiometry was performed one year after the surgery and the post- surgical air-bone gap was calculated, estimating the pure tone average from both air and bone postsurgical conduction. Results: Surgery success (air-bone gap <20dB) was achieved in 90.3% of the cases using stapedectomy technique while a 85.7% with stapedotomy technique. Altogether, considering both groups, the success of the surgery was 88.9%. There were no statistically significant differences between both techniques. Conclusions: After the results of our study, we can affirm that stapedotomy and stapedectomy have similar success rates in terms of decreasing the post-surgical air-bone gap and achieving clinical improvement of hearing, showing no statistically significant differences between them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信