在为期一年的混合式学习课程中分析书面文本的六种理论方法

A. Borgobello, Andrea Espinosa, Mariana Sartori
{"title":"在为期一年的混合式学习课程中分析书面文本的六种理论方法","authors":"A. Borgobello, Andrea Espinosa, Mariana Sartori","doi":"10.33881/2027-1786.RIP.11312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual environment interaction has been studied from different theoretical-methodological approaches. The purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of written texts in a blended learning course, and to analyze six theoretical systems that contrast them with data. The collected data come from all the texts written in Moodle by the teacher in a year-long course. The variables were set up from six approaches (coding systems): (a)- Communities of inquiry; (b)- Teaching assistance dimensions; (c)- Macro and micro-scripting; (d)- Twelve ways of teaching; (e)- Rethinking the class; and (f)- Observation record. Reliability and multivariable analyses were carried out. Results showed different consistency of approaches. The analyzed texts revealed how interaction took place and showed pedagogical issues underlying the didactic proposals. Associations among categories produced three typical groups of texts related with the different variables from theoreticalmethodological coding systems used: Cluster 1 gathered general instructions; Cluster 2 illustrated the virtual environment usage as repository; and Cluster 3 represented tutorial interactivity. Future studies should continue to explore these approaches, contrasting them with new data -and vice versa- to get a better understanding of socio-cognitive interaction among students and teachers in blended learning.","PeriodicalId":34712,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Six theoretical-methodological approaches to analyze written texts in a year-long Blended Learning cours\",\"authors\":\"A. Borgobello, Andrea Espinosa, Mariana Sartori\",\"doi\":\"10.33881/2027-1786.RIP.11312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Virtual environment interaction has been studied from different theoretical-methodological approaches. The purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of written texts in a blended learning course, and to analyze six theoretical systems that contrast them with data. The collected data come from all the texts written in Moodle by the teacher in a year-long course. The variables were set up from six approaches (coding systems): (a)- Communities of inquiry; (b)- Teaching assistance dimensions; (c)- Macro and micro-scripting; (d)- Twelve ways of teaching; (e)- Rethinking the class; and (f)- Observation record. Reliability and multivariable analyses were carried out. Results showed different consistency of approaches. The analyzed texts revealed how interaction took place and showed pedagogical issues underlying the didactic proposals. Associations among categories produced three typical groups of texts related with the different variables from theoreticalmethodological coding systems used: Cluster 1 gathered general instructions; Cluster 2 illustrated the virtual environment usage as repository; and Cluster 3 represented tutorial interactivity. Future studies should continue to explore these approaches, contrasting them with new data -and vice versa- to get a better understanding of socio-cognitive interaction among students and teachers in blended learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.RIP.11312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.RIP.11312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从不同的理论方法论角度对虚拟环境交互进行了研究。本文的目的是描述混合学习课程中书面文本的特点,并分析六个理论体系,将其与数据进行对比。收集的数据来自老师在一年的课程中用Moodle写的所有文本。变量是从六种方法(编码系统)建立的:(a)-调查社区;(b) -教学辅助维度;(c) -宏和微脚本;(d) -十二种教学方法;(e) -重新思考课堂;和(f)-观察记录。进行了可靠性和多变量分析。结果显示了不同方法的一致性。分析的文本揭示了互动是如何发生的,并显示了教学建议背后的教学问题。类别之间的关联产生了三组典型的文本,这些文本与所使用的理论方法编码系统中的不同变量有关:聚类1收集了一般指令;集群2说明了虚拟环境作为存储库的使用;集群3代表教程交互性。未来的研究应该继续探索这些方法,将其与新数据进行对比,反之亦然,以更好地了解混合学习中学生和教师之间的社会认知互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Six theoretical-methodological approaches to analyze written texts in a year-long Blended Learning cours
Virtual environment interaction has been studied from different theoretical-methodological approaches. The purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of written texts in a blended learning course, and to analyze six theoretical systems that contrast them with data. The collected data come from all the texts written in Moodle by the teacher in a year-long course. The variables were set up from six approaches (coding systems): (a)- Communities of inquiry; (b)- Teaching assistance dimensions; (c)- Macro and micro-scripting; (d)- Twelve ways of teaching; (e)- Rethinking the class; and (f)- Observation record. Reliability and multivariable analyses were carried out. Results showed different consistency of approaches. The analyzed texts revealed how interaction took place and showed pedagogical issues underlying the didactic proposals. Associations among categories produced three typical groups of texts related with the different variables from theoreticalmethodological coding systems used: Cluster 1 gathered general instructions; Cluster 2 illustrated the virtual environment usage as repository; and Cluster 3 represented tutorial interactivity. Future studies should continue to explore these approaches, contrasting them with new data -and vice versa- to get a better understanding of socio-cognitive interaction among students and teachers in blended learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信