其他世界:古代欧亚大陆晚期艺术中的乌托邦

IF 0.1 0 ART
J. Elsner
{"title":"其他世界:古代欧亚大陆晚期艺术中的乌托邦","authors":"J. Elsner","doi":"10.1086/718015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines a profound contradiction inherent in the idea of utopia as conceptually formulated by Thomas More in the Renaissance and clearly implicit in pre-humanist utopian, Arcadian, or paradisal imagery and descriptions, reaching back via early Christianity to Greco-Roman antiquity and resonating equally within Asian Buddhism. The idea of utopia from Greek antiquity to ancient India has evoked an optimism not unconnected to the conviction that there is a better place to which we will go after death, such as heaven. This kind of faith can have no rational basis, but the human condition is susceptible to a good deal more than the mere constraints of reason. Arguably, the only philosophically viable utopia is apophatic—that is, a place or state undescribable by any of the concepts or discourses used to define real spaces. Despite clear awareness across Eurasian cultures of the irrationality of a positive utopia (as we still continue to understand the word), their visual productions proceeded to give full vent to this optimism. This article examines a comparative range of such visual approaches across ancient Eurasia.","PeriodicalId":53917,"journal":{"name":"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture","volume":"28 1","pages":"19 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Other Worlds: Utopias in the Art of Late Ancient Eurasia\",\"authors\":\"J. Elsner\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/718015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines a profound contradiction inherent in the idea of utopia as conceptually formulated by Thomas More in the Renaissance and clearly implicit in pre-humanist utopian, Arcadian, or paradisal imagery and descriptions, reaching back via early Christianity to Greco-Roman antiquity and resonating equally within Asian Buddhism. The idea of utopia from Greek antiquity to ancient India has evoked an optimism not unconnected to the conviction that there is a better place to which we will go after death, such as heaven. This kind of faith can have no rational basis, but the human condition is susceptible to a good deal more than the mere constraints of reason. Arguably, the only philosophically viable utopia is apophatic—that is, a place or state undescribable by any of the concepts or discourses used to define real spaces. Despite clear awareness across Eurasian cultures of the irrationality of a positive utopia (as we still continue to understand the word), their visual productions proceeded to give full vent to this optimism. This article examines a comparative range of such visual approaches across ancient Eurasia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/718015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/718015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了乌托邦概念中固有的深刻矛盾,这一概念是由托马斯·莫尔在文艺复兴时期概念化的,并且明显隐含在前人道主义乌托邦、田园牧歌或天堂的意象和描述中,可以追溯到早期基督教到希腊罗马时代,并在亚洲佛教中产生同样的共鸣。从古希腊到古印度,乌托邦的概念唤起了一种乐观主义,这种乐观主义与我们死后会去一个更好的地方的信念不无关系,比如天堂。这种信仰可能没有理性基础,但人类的状况容易受到远不止理性约束的影响。可以说,唯一在哲学上可行的乌托邦是虚无缥缈的,也就是说,一个地方或状态,用任何概念或话语来定义真实的空间都无法描述。尽管欧亚文化清楚地意识到积极乌托邦的不合理性(我们仍然继续理解这个词),但他们的视觉作品继续充分发泄这种乐观主义。本文考察了古代欧亚大陆上这种视觉方法的比较范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Other Worlds: Utopias in the Art of Late Ancient Eurasia
This article examines a profound contradiction inherent in the idea of utopia as conceptually formulated by Thomas More in the Renaissance and clearly implicit in pre-humanist utopian, Arcadian, or paradisal imagery and descriptions, reaching back via early Christianity to Greco-Roman antiquity and resonating equally within Asian Buddhism. The idea of utopia from Greek antiquity to ancient India has evoked an optimism not unconnected to the conviction that there is a better place to which we will go after death, such as heaven. This kind of faith can have no rational basis, but the human condition is susceptible to a good deal more than the mere constraints of reason. Arguably, the only philosophically viable utopia is apophatic—that is, a place or state undescribable by any of the concepts or discourses used to define real spaces. Despite clear awareness across Eurasian cultures of the irrationality of a positive utopia (as we still continue to understand the word), their visual productions proceeded to give full vent to this optimism. This article examines a comparative range of such visual approaches across ancient Eurasia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信