无张力阴道带中段尿道悬吊术后的短期尿潴留

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gabriella Marguerite Rustia, Michael G Baracy, Fatima Awan, Karen H Hagglund, Muhammad Faisal Aslam
{"title":"无张力阴道带中段尿道悬吊术后的短期尿潴留","authors":"Gabriella Marguerite Rustia, Michael G Baracy, Fatima Awan, Karen H Hagglund, Muhammad Faisal Aslam","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to determine whether a difference exists in short-term urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) midurethral sling placement when performed alone compared with when placed during a concomitant prolapse procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study that compared TVT procedures performed alone (group 1) to those with a concomitant prolapse procedure (group 2). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged with an indwelling Foley catheter after failing postoperative voiding trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 100 women in group 1 and 267 women in group 2. Concomitant prolapse procedures included vaginal approach (n = 47), robotic (n = 218), or both (n = 2). Forty-nine patients (13.4%) failed the initial voiding trial and 21 patients (5.7%) were discharged with an indwelling Foley catheter. The rate of short-term urinary retention requiring an indwelling catheter at discharge was not significantly different between group 1 and group 2 (9 [9.0%] vs 12 [4.5%], P = 0.1). The duration of catheterization after discharge was shorter in group 1 compared with group 2 (2.1 ± 1.1 vs 4.3 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, patients discharged with a catheter were more likely to have diabetes with an odds ratio of 3.1 (95th confidence interval, 1.2-8.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of patients discharged with an indwelling catheter did not significantly differ if TVT was performed alone or at the time of a concomitant prolapse procedure (9.0% vs 4.5%, P = 0.1).</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"e44-e48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-Term Urinary Retention After Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Midurethral Sling Performed Alone or as a Concomitant Procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriella Marguerite Rustia, Michael G Baracy, Fatima Awan, Karen H Hagglund, Muhammad Faisal Aslam\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to determine whether a difference exists in short-term urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) midurethral sling placement when performed alone compared with when placed during a concomitant prolapse procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study that compared TVT procedures performed alone (group 1) to those with a concomitant prolapse procedure (group 2). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged with an indwelling Foley catheter after failing postoperative voiding trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 100 women in group 1 and 267 women in group 2. Concomitant prolapse procedures included vaginal approach (n = 47), robotic (n = 218), or both (n = 2). Forty-nine patients (13.4%) failed the initial voiding trial and 21 patients (5.7%) were discharged with an indwelling Foley catheter. The rate of short-term urinary retention requiring an indwelling catheter at discharge was not significantly different between group 1 and group 2 (9 [9.0%] vs 12 [4.5%], P = 0.1). The duration of catheterization after discharge was shorter in group 1 compared with group 2 (2.1 ± 1.1 vs 4.3 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, patients discharged with a catheter were more likely to have diabetes with an odds ratio of 3.1 (95th confidence interval, 1.2-8.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of patients discharged with an indwelling catheter did not significantly differ if TVT was performed alone or at the time of a concomitant prolapse procedure (9.0% vs 4.5%, P = 0.1).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"e44-e48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001153\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是确定单独放置无张力阴道带(TVT)尿道中吊带与同时放置脱垂手术后短期尿潴留是否存在差异。方法:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,比较单独进行TVT手术(第一组)和合并脱垂手术(第二组)。主要结局是术后排尿试验失败后留置Foley导管出院的患者比例。结果1组100例,2组267例。伴随脱垂的手术包括阴道入路(n = 47),机器人(n = 218),或两者都有(n = 2)。49例(13.4%)患者在最初的排尿试验中失败,21例(5.7%)患者留置Foley导管出院。1组与2组的短期尿潴留发生率无显著性差异(9例[9.0%]vs 12例[4.5%],P = 0.1)。1组患者出院后置管时间短于2组(2.1±1.1 vs 4.3±2.0 d, P = 0.008)。在多因素分析中,留置导管出院的患者更容易发生糖尿病,比值比为3.1(95可信区间为1.2-8.1)。结论单独行TVT或同时行脱垂手术时留置导管出院的患者比例无显著差异(9.0% vs 4.5%, P = 0.1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-Term Urinary Retention After Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Midurethral Sling Performed Alone or as a Concomitant Procedure.

Objective: The objective was to determine whether a difference exists in short-term urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) midurethral sling placement when performed alone compared with when placed during a concomitant prolapse procedure.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study that compared TVT procedures performed alone (group 1) to those with a concomitant prolapse procedure (group 2). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged with an indwelling Foley catheter after failing postoperative voiding trial.

Results: There were 100 women in group 1 and 267 women in group 2. Concomitant prolapse procedures included vaginal approach (n = 47), robotic (n = 218), or both (n = 2). Forty-nine patients (13.4%) failed the initial voiding trial and 21 patients (5.7%) were discharged with an indwelling Foley catheter. The rate of short-term urinary retention requiring an indwelling catheter at discharge was not significantly different between group 1 and group 2 (9 [9.0%] vs 12 [4.5%], P = 0.1). The duration of catheterization after discharge was shorter in group 1 compared with group 2 (2.1 ± 1.1 vs 4.3 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, patients discharged with a catheter were more likely to have diabetes with an odds ratio of 3.1 (95th confidence interval, 1.2-8.1).

Conclusions: The proportion of patients discharged with an indwelling catheter did not significantly differ if TVT was performed alone or at the time of a concomitant prolapse procedure (9.0% vs 4.5%, P = 0.1).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信