膝骨关节炎超声诊断积液性滑膜炎的可靠性

Lindsey A. MacFarlane , Maame B. Opare-Addo , Jeffrey N. Katz , Jamie E. Collins , Elena Losina , Sara K. Tedeschi
{"title":"膝骨关节炎超声诊断积液性滑膜炎的可靠性","authors":"Lindsey A. MacFarlane ,&nbsp;Maame B. Opare-Addo ,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Katz ,&nbsp;Jamie E. Collins ,&nbsp;Elena Losina ,&nbsp;Sara K. Tedeschi","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2023.100164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>There is increasing use of ultrasound to identify effusion and synovitis, which are proxies for inflammation, in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Ultrasound appears to be a valid modality for assessing effusion and synovitis when compared to MRI, but its reliability has been questioned. We aimed to assess the agreement of ultrasound-identified effusion and synovitis between two readers.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We included 30 unique knees from a cohort with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA. A single ultrasonographer performed ultrasound of the suprapatellar recess. Two readers with different levels of experience read the images. We specified maximal effusion depth first as continuous (mm) and then as binary, dichotomized at ≥4 mm (present) vs. &lt;4 mm (absent). We graded synovitis in the suprapatellar recess (0–3) based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) guidelines. We used proportions to determine inter-rater agreement for continuous variables and Cohen's Kappa or weighted Cohen's Kappa for agreement of binary and ordinal variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the participants was 66 years. Seventeen (57%) were female. For maximal effusion depth the readers differed by ≤ 2 mm 80% of the time. For the presence of effusion (binary), the Cohen's Kappa for the two readers was 0.69 (95% CI 0.40–0.97). Synovitis grade (0–3) for the two readers had a weighted Cohen's Kappa of 0.76 (95% CI 0.58–0.94).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found moderate to strong inter-reader agreement of ultrasound identified effusion-synovitis in knee OA between two readers with differing ultrasound experience. Ultrasound may be a viable bedside tool for identifying the subset of OA patients with effusion or synovitis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of ultrasound-detected effusion-synovitis in knee osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey A. MacFarlane ,&nbsp;Maame B. Opare-Addo ,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Katz ,&nbsp;Jamie E. Collins ,&nbsp;Elena Losina ,&nbsp;Sara K. Tedeschi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ostima.2023.100164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>There is increasing use of ultrasound to identify effusion and synovitis, which are proxies for inflammation, in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Ultrasound appears to be a valid modality for assessing effusion and synovitis when compared to MRI, but its reliability has been questioned. We aimed to assess the agreement of ultrasound-identified effusion and synovitis between two readers.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We included 30 unique knees from a cohort with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA. A single ultrasonographer performed ultrasound of the suprapatellar recess. Two readers with different levels of experience read the images. We specified maximal effusion depth first as continuous (mm) and then as binary, dichotomized at ≥4 mm (present) vs. &lt;4 mm (absent). We graded synovitis in the suprapatellar recess (0–3) based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) guidelines. We used proportions to determine inter-rater agreement for continuous variables and Cohen's Kappa or weighted Cohen's Kappa for agreement of binary and ordinal variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the participants was 66 years. Seventeen (57%) were female. For maximal effusion depth the readers differed by ≤ 2 mm 80% of the time. For the presence of effusion (binary), the Cohen's Kappa for the two readers was 0.69 (95% CI 0.40–0.97). Synovitis grade (0–3) for the two readers had a weighted Cohen's Kappa of 0.76 (95% CI 0.58–0.94).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found moderate to strong inter-reader agreement of ultrasound identified effusion-synovitis in knee OA between two readers with differing ultrasound experience. Ultrasound may be a viable bedside tool for identifying the subset of OA patients with effusion or synovitis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis imaging\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265412300082X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265412300082X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在膝关节骨关节炎(OA)中,越来越多地使用超声来识别积液和滑膜炎,这是炎症的替代指标。与MRI相比,超声似乎是评估积液和滑膜炎的有效方式,但其可靠性受到质疑。我们的目的是评估超声识别积液和滑膜炎之间的两个读者的一致性。设计:我们从有症状和影像学表现的膝关节OA队列中纳入30个独特的膝关节。单个超声医师对髌上隐窝进行超声检查。两个具有不同经验水平的读者阅读这些图像。我们首先将最大积液深度指定为连续(mm),然后将其分为≥4mm(存在)和≥4mm(不存在)。我们根据风湿病预后指标(OMERACT)指南对髌上隐窝滑膜炎进行分级(0-3)。我们使用比例来确定连续变量和科恩Kappa之间的一致性,或者加权科恩Kappa来确定二元和有序变量的一致性。结果研究对象平均年龄66岁。17例(57%)为女性。对于最大积液深度,80%的读数相差≤2mm。对于存在积液(二元),两位读者的Cohen's Kappa为0.69 (95% CI 0.40-0.97)。两名读者的滑膜炎分级(0-3)加权Cohen's Kappa为0.76 (95% CI 0.58-0.94)。结论不同超声经验的读者对膝关节骨性关节炎积液滑膜炎的诊断具有中等到高度的一致性。超声可能是鉴别有积液或滑膜炎的OA患者亚群的可行床边工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of ultrasound-detected effusion-synovitis in knee osteoarthritis

Objective

There is increasing use of ultrasound to identify effusion and synovitis, which are proxies for inflammation, in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Ultrasound appears to be a valid modality for assessing effusion and synovitis when compared to MRI, but its reliability has been questioned. We aimed to assess the agreement of ultrasound-identified effusion and synovitis between two readers.

Design

We included 30 unique knees from a cohort with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA. A single ultrasonographer performed ultrasound of the suprapatellar recess. Two readers with different levels of experience read the images. We specified maximal effusion depth first as continuous (mm) and then as binary, dichotomized at ≥4 mm (present) vs. <4 mm (absent). We graded synovitis in the suprapatellar recess (0–3) based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) guidelines. We used proportions to determine inter-rater agreement for continuous variables and Cohen's Kappa or weighted Cohen's Kappa for agreement of binary and ordinal variables.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 66 years. Seventeen (57%) were female. For maximal effusion depth the readers differed by ≤ 2 mm 80% of the time. For the presence of effusion (binary), the Cohen's Kappa for the two readers was 0.69 (95% CI 0.40–0.97). Synovitis grade (0–3) for the two readers had a weighted Cohen's Kappa of 0.76 (95% CI 0.58–0.94).

Conclusion

We found moderate to strong inter-reader agreement of ultrasound identified effusion-synovitis in knee OA between two readers with differing ultrasound experience. Ultrasound may be a viable bedside tool for identifying the subset of OA patients with effusion or synovitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信