在人类垃圾和被毁坏的森林之间做出选择:不反抗的大西洋森林小型哺乳动物的恢复力

Q3 Environmental Science
Fernanda Gatto-Almeida, Juliana Quadros, Liliani Marilia Tiepolo
{"title":"在人类垃圾和被毁坏的森林之间做出选择:不反抗的大西洋森林小型哺乳动物的恢复力","authors":"Fernanda Gatto-Almeida, Juliana Quadros, Liliani Marilia Tiepolo","doi":"10.25260/ea.23.33.3.0.2034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open pit rubbish dumps generate serious environmental problems both in Brazil and elsewhere. The goal of this study was to evaluate the occurrence patterns of an assemblage of small flightless mammals in the area of a landfill deactivated 19 years ago. During nine campaigns, three different sites located in a subtropical protected area near the city of Matinhos, Paraná coast, southern Brazil, were sampled. The selected places were an artificial clearing where urban waste had previously been dumped (Area 1), a site with less anthropic influence with tree species and a poorly developed understorey (Area 2), and a site with well-formed vegetation, with herbaceous, shrubby and tree strata well developed (Area 3). The total capture effort was 5210 trap-nights; 109 captures were made of 82 individuals from five species of Rodentia (all from the subfamily Sigmodontinae) and three species of marsupials (Order Didelphimorphia). The most conserved site (Area 3) had higher abundance than areas 1 and 2 (binomial test; P<0.05). Area 1, considered the most affected, showed less species richness (n=6) than the other two areas (7 and 8 species), although this may be affected by the lower number of captures. The diversity in Area 1, estimated by the Shannon index, was lower than in areas 2 and 3 (Hutcheson’s t tests; H’=1.26 for Area 1 vs. 1.76 and 1.68 for Areas 2 and 3, respectively), although the composition of the assemblage did not differ significantly between the areas (PERMANOVA; P=0.085). Our results show that even after 19 years of inactivity, the deposited waste is still having a negative impact on the environment, and highlight the resilience of some native small mammal species in exploiting the resources of degraded areas.","PeriodicalId":53684,"journal":{"name":"Ecologia Austral","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing between human trash and trashed forests: Resilience in nonvolant Atlantic Forest small mammals\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Gatto-Almeida, Juliana Quadros, Liliani Marilia Tiepolo\",\"doi\":\"10.25260/ea.23.33.3.0.2034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Open pit rubbish dumps generate serious environmental problems both in Brazil and elsewhere. The goal of this study was to evaluate the occurrence patterns of an assemblage of small flightless mammals in the area of a landfill deactivated 19 years ago. During nine campaigns, three different sites located in a subtropical protected area near the city of Matinhos, Paraná coast, southern Brazil, were sampled. The selected places were an artificial clearing where urban waste had previously been dumped (Area 1), a site with less anthropic influence with tree species and a poorly developed understorey (Area 2), and a site with well-formed vegetation, with herbaceous, shrubby and tree strata well developed (Area 3). The total capture effort was 5210 trap-nights; 109 captures were made of 82 individuals from five species of Rodentia (all from the subfamily Sigmodontinae) and three species of marsupials (Order Didelphimorphia). The most conserved site (Area 3) had higher abundance than areas 1 and 2 (binomial test; P<0.05). Area 1, considered the most affected, showed less species richness (n=6) than the other two areas (7 and 8 species), although this may be affected by the lower number of captures. The diversity in Area 1, estimated by the Shannon index, was lower than in areas 2 and 3 (Hutcheson’s t tests; H’=1.26 for Area 1 vs. 1.76 and 1.68 for Areas 2 and 3, respectively), although the composition of the assemblage did not differ significantly between the areas (PERMANOVA; P=0.085). Our results show that even after 19 years of inactivity, the deposited waste is still having a negative impact on the environment, and highlight the resilience of some native small mammal species in exploiting the resources of degraded areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecologia Austral\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecologia Austral\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25260/ea.23.33.3.0.2034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecologia Austral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25260/ea.23.33.3.0.2034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

露天垃圾场在巴西和其他地方都造成了严重的环境问题。这项研究的目的是评估19年前停用的垃圾填埋场区域内一个不会飞的小型哺乳动物群落的发生模式。在九次战役中,对位于巴西南部巴拉那海岸Matinhos市附近亚热带保护区的三个不同地点进行了采样。选定的地点是一个以前倾倒过城市垃圾的人工清理区(区域1),一个对树木物种和发育不良的下层影响较小的地点(区域2),以及一个植被发育良好、草本、灌木和树木地层发育良好的地点(区域3)。总共捕获5210个陷阱夜;109次捕获了来自五种啮齿动物(均来自Sigmodontinae亚科)和三种有袋动物(Didelphimorphia目)的82只个体。最保守的区域(区域3)的丰度高于区域1和区域2(二项检验;P<0.05)。被认为受影响最大的区域1的物种丰富度(n=6)低于其他两个区域(7和8个物种),尽管这可能受到较低捕获次数的影响。根据香农指数估计,1区的多样性低于2区和3区(Hutcheson t检验;1区的H'=1.26,2区和三区的分别为1.76和1.68),尽管不同地区的组合组成没有显著差异(PERMANOVA;P=0.085)。我们的结果表明,即使在19年的不活动之后,沉积的废物仍然对环境产生负面影响,并突出了一些本土小型哺乳动物物种在开发退化地区资源方面的韧性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choosing between human trash and trashed forests: Resilience in nonvolant Atlantic Forest small mammals
Open pit rubbish dumps generate serious environmental problems both in Brazil and elsewhere. The goal of this study was to evaluate the occurrence patterns of an assemblage of small flightless mammals in the area of a landfill deactivated 19 years ago. During nine campaigns, three different sites located in a subtropical protected area near the city of Matinhos, Paraná coast, southern Brazil, were sampled. The selected places were an artificial clearing where urban waste had previously been dumped (Area 1), a site with less anthropic influence with tree species and a poorly developed understorey (Area 2), and a site with well-formed vegetation, with herbaceous, shrubby and tree strata well developed (Area 3). The total capture effort was 5210 trap-nights; 109 captures were made of 82 individuals from five species of Rodentia (all from the subfamily Sigmodontinae) and three species of marsupials (Order Didelphimorphia). The most conserved site (Area 3) had higher abundance than areas 1 and 2 (binomial test; P<0.05). Area 1, considered the most affected, showed less species richness (n=6) than the other two areas (7 and 8 species), although this may be affected by the lower number of captures. The diversity in Area 1, estimated by the Shannon index, was lower than in areas 2 and 3 (Hutcheson’s t tests; H’=1.26 for Area 1 vs. 1.76 and 1.68 for Areas 2 and 3, respectively), although the composition of the assemblage did not differ significantly between the areas (PERMANOVA; P=0.085). Our results show that even after 19 years of inactivity, the deposited waste is still having a negative impact on the environment, and highlight the resilience of some native small mammal species in exploiting the resources of degraded areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecologia Austral
Ecologia Austral Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecología Austral is the scientific journal published by the Ecological Society of Argentina, that is distributed for free among regular members. It publishes original scientific articles in any branch of the environmental sciences. The articles, in Spanish, English or Portuguese, can be results of original and unpublished scientific research, reviews and updates that summarize the current state of the art on a certain subject, points of view on theory and/or methods in ecology, and teaching aids to be used as supporting reading for students. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by two experts and the revision process is completed within three months after submission and published between two and six month after final acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信