点击诱发的听觉脑干反应(ABRs)在精神分裂症中是完整的,并且对认知训练不敏感

Q2 Medicine
Peter E. Clayson , Yash B. Joshi , Michael L. Thomas , Joyce Sprock , John Nungaray , Neal R. Swerdlow , Gregory A. Light
{"title":"点击诱发的听觉脑干反应(ABRs)在精神分裂症中是完整的,并且对认知训练不敏感","authors":"Peter E. Clayson ,&nbsp;Yash B. Joshi ,&nbsp;Michael L. Thomas ,&nbsp;Joyce Sprock ,&nbsp;John Nungaray ,&nbsp;Neal R. Swerdlow ,&nbsp;Gregory A. Light","doi":"10.1016/j.bionps.2022.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients with schizophrenia have impairments in early auditory system functioning that relate to clinical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Some neurophysiological biomarkers of auditory information processing are sensitive to and predictive of clinically relevant outcomes following auditory-based targeted cognitive training (TCT) in schizophrenia. It is not known, however, whether schizophrenia patients show abnormalities at the earliest stage of sensory processing reflecting the integrity of the ascending auditory pathway at the level of the brainstem, or whether such abnormalities can serve as biomarkers. This study aimed to determine whether click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (click ABRs) are 1) abnormal in schizophrenia patients relative to healthy comparison subjects (HCS), 2) acutely sensitive to or predictive of TCT response, and 3) associated with clinically relevant symptoms. We also sought to determine whether 4) click ABRs show adequate psychometric reliability. Click ABRs were examined in 52 patients with schizophrenia and 32 HCS. Patients were randomized to either TCT (<em>n</em> = 30), which comprised 30 h of training, or treatment as usual (TAU; <em>n</em> = 23). Patients showed intact click ABRs relative to HCS and click ABRs did not change significantly after 1 or 30 h of TCT. Exploratory analyses revealed modest relationships between click ABRs and baseline measures of positive symptoms and speech-in-noise perception; acute changes in ABRs were modestly related to improvements on measures of cognition independent of treatment. ABR measurements showed adequate internal consistency indicating their suitability for cross-sectional studies of individual differences, but poor test-retest reliability indicating poor suitability for clinical trials. In contrast to a growing literature demonstrating the utility of later cortical neurophysiological measures for translational research, the present findings indicate that brainstem-mediated responses are intact in schizophrenia and are not sensitive to or predictive of clinical changes in the context of TCT. These data provide guidance for establishing future neurophysiology-guided interventions in schizophrenia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52767,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666144622000016/pdfft?md5=c764a50a22546f00b892458f28e162cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2666144622000016-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) are intact in schizophrenia and not sensitive to cognitive training\",\"authors\":\"Peter E. Clayson ,&nbsp;Yash B. Joshi ,&nbsp;Michael L. Thomas ,&nbsp;Joyce Sprock ,&nbsp;John Nungaray ,&nbsp;Neal R. Swerdlow ,&nbsp;Gregory A. Light\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bionps.2022.100046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patients with schizophrenia have impairments in early auditory system functioning that relate to clinical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Some neurophysiological biomarkers of auditory information processing are sensitive to and predictive of clinically relevant outcomes following auditory-based targeted cognitive training (TCT) in schizophrenia. It is not known, however, whether schizophrenia patients show abnormalities at the earliest stage of sensory processing reflecting the integrity of the ascending auditory pathway at the level of the brainstem, or whether such abnormalities can serve as biomarkers. This study aimed to determine whether click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (click ABRs) are 1) abnormal in schizophrenia patients relative to healthy comparison subjects (HCS), 2) acutely sensitive to or predictive of TCT response, and 3) associated with clinically relevant symptoms. We also sought to determine whether 4) click ABRs show adequate psychometric reliability. Click ABRs were examined in 52 patients with schizophrenia and 32 HCS. Patients were randomized to either TCT (<em>n</em> = 30), which comprised 30 h of training, or treatment as usual (TAU; <em>n</em> = 23). Patients showed intact click ABRs relative to HCS and click ABRs did not change significantly after 1 or 30 h of TCT. Exploratory analyses revealed modest relationships between click ABRs and baseline measures of positive symptoms and speech-in-noise perception; acute changes in ABRs were modestly related to improvements on measures of cognition independent of treatment. ABR measurements showed adequate internal consistency indicating their suitability for cross-sectional studies of individual differences, but poor test-retest reliability indicating poor suitability for clinical trials. In contrast to a growing literature demonstrating the utility of later cortical neurophysiological measures for translational research, the present findings indicate that brainstem-mediated responses are intact in schizophrenia and are not sensitive to or predictive of clinical changes in the context of TCT. These data provide guidance for establishing future neurophysiology-guided interventions in schizophrenia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666144622000016/pdfft?md5=c764a50a22546f00b892458f28e162cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2666144622000016-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666144622000016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666144622000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神分裂症患者早期听觉系统功能受损,与临床、认知和社会心理功能有关。听觉信息处理的一些神经生理生物标志物对精神分裂症患者基于听觉的靶向认知训练(TCT)后的临床相关结果敏感并可预测。然而,尚不清楚精神分裂症患者是否在反映脑干水平上升听觉通路完整性的感觉加工的早期阶段表现出异常,或者这种异常是否可以作为生物标志物。本研究旨在确定点击诱发的听觉脑干反应(click ABRs)是否1)精神分裂症患者相对于健康对照组(HCS)异常,2)对TCT反应敏感或可预测,3)与临床相关症状相关。我们也试图确定点击abr是否具有足够的心理测量信度。对52例精神分裂症患者和32例HCS患者进行Click abr检测。患者被随机分配到TCT组(n = 30),其中包括30小时的训练,或照常治疗(TAU;n = 23)。相对于HCS,患者显示完整的点击abr,并且在TCT 1或30小时后,点击abr没有明显变化。探索性分析显示,点击abr与阳性症状和噪音中言语感知的基线测量之间存在适度关系;abr的急性变化与独立于治疗的认知测量的改善有中度相关性。ABR测量显示出足够的内部一致性,表明它们适合于个体差异的横断面研究,但较差的重测信度表明不适合临床试验。与越来越多的文献证明后期皮层神经生理学测量在转化研究中的效用相反,目前的研究结果表明,脑干介导的反应在精神分裂症中是完整的,对TCT背景下的临床变化不敏感或不预测。这些数据为今后建立以神经生理学为指导的精神分裂症干预措施提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) are intact in schizophrenia and not sensitive to cognitive training

Patients with schizophrenia have impairments in early auditory system functioning that relate to clinical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Some neurophysiological biomarkers of auditory information processing are sensitive to and predictive of clinically relevant outcomes following auditory-based targeted cognitive training (TCT) in schizophrenia. It is not known, however, whether schizophrenia patients show abnormalities at the earliest stage of sensory processing reflecting the integrity of the ascending auditory pathway at the level of the brainstem, or whether such abnormalities can serve as biomarkers. This study aimed to determine whether click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (click ABRs) are 1) abnormal in schizophrenia patients relative to healthy comparison subjects (HCS), 2) acutely sensitive to or predictive of TCT response, and 3) associated with clinically relevant symptoms. We also sought to determine whether 4) click ABRs show adequate psychometric reliability. Click ABRs were examined in 52 patients with schizophrenia and 32 HCS. Patients were randomized to either TCT (n = 30), which comprised 30 h of training, or treatment as usual (TAU; n = 23). Patients showed intact click ABRs relative to HCS and click ABRs did not change significantly after 1 or 30 h of TCT. Exploratory analyses revealed modest relationships between click ABRs and baseline measures of positive symptoms and speech-in-noise perception; acute changes in ABRs were modestly related to improvements on measures of cognition independent of treatment. ABR measurements showed adequate internal consistency indicating their suitability for cross-sectional studies of individual differences, but poor test-retest reliability indicating poor suitability for clinical trials. In contrast to a growing literature demonstrating the utility of later cortical neurophysiological measures for translational research, the present findings indicate that brainstem-mediated responses are intact in schizophrenia and are not sensitive to or predictive of clinical changes in the context of TCT. These data provide guidance for establishing future neurophysiology-guided interventions in schizophrenia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry
Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信