素食饮食对健康的益处:最新见解

IF 1.3 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
C. Radnitz, Jingwen Ni, Danielle Dennis, Brianna Cerrito
{"title":"素食饮食对健康的益处:最新见解","authors":"C. Radnitz, Jingwen Ni, Danielle Dennis, Brianna Cerrito","doi":"10.2147/nds.s191793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To assess the health bene fi ts of a vegan diet, observational studies of diabetes (non-insulindependent;NIDDM),cancer,mortality,gutmicrobiota,hypertension,lipids,andoverweight were examined. Utilizing PRISMA items to identify articles and assess their quality for inclusion, 44 studies were screened into the review. In two separate studies, vegans did not have a reduced risk of diagnosis of “ any ” cancer, nor of speci fi c cancers when the effects of BMI were adjusted. When datawereaggregated,therewasareducedriskofanycancer.Veganshadlowertotalcholesteroland LDL-C levels compared to omnivores, and in some cases other dietary groups. In the US, there was areduced riskofadiagnosisofNIDDMandinWesterncountries,veganshad lowerBMI.Research support for reduced risk of diagnosis of female cancers, improved mortality rates, lower blood pressure, lower triglycerides, and a healthier microbiome for vegans compared to omnivores was inconsistent. There was no evidence that reduced speci fi c cancer incidence rates were lower in vegans although inadequate sample sizes had hampered these analyses. In vegans, HDL-C levels were either lower or not signi fi cantly different from omnivores. Geographic location was a strong moderatorwiththemostcompellingevidenceforthehealthadvantagesofavegandietcomingfrom the US, whereas in Taiwan, India and Vietnam, there was much less evidence of its bene fi t. In some instances, sex moderated the association between adopting the diet and health outcomes. speci fi c the diet, dietary comparison groups utilized in studies may alsoaffectresults.Althoughavegandietisassociatedwithsomehealthbene fi ts,thelevelofsupport for the bene fi t varied according to the health outcome being measured, with evidence emerging that BMI is an important mediator and geography and to a lesser extent sex are important moderators.","PeriodicalId":43423,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Dietary Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/nds.s191793","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Benefits of a Vegan Diet: Current Insights\",\"authors\":\"C. Radnitz, Jingwen Ni, Danielle Dennis, Brianna Cerrito\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/nds.s191793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": To assess the health bene fi ts of a vegan diet, observational studies of diabetes (non-insulindependent;NIDDM),cancer,mortality,gutmicrobiota,hypertension,lipids,andoverweight were examined. Utilizing PRISMA items to identify articles and assess their quality for inclusion, 44 studies were screened into the review. In two separate studies, vegans did not have a reduced risk of diagnosis of “ any ” cancer, nor of speci fi c cancers when the effects of BMI were adjusted. When datawereaggregated,therewasareducedriskofanycancer.Veganshadlowertotalcholesteroland LDL-C levels compared to omnivores, and in some cases other dietary groups. In the US, there was areduced riskofadiagnosisofNIDDMandinWesterncountries,veganshad lowerBMI.Research support for reduced risk of diagnosis of female cancers, improved mortality rates, lower blood pressure, lower triglycerides, and a healthier microbiome for vegans compared to omnivores was inconsistent. There was no evidence that reduced speci fi c cancer incidence rates were lower in vegans although inadequate sample sizes had hampered these analyses. In vegans, HDL-C levels were either lower or not signi fi cantly different from omnivores. Geographic location was a strong moderatorwiththemostcompellingevidenceforthehealthadvantagesofavegandietcomingfrom the US, whereas in Taiwan, India and Vietnam, there was much less evidence of its bene fi t. In some instances, sex moderated the association between adopting the diet and health outcomes. speci fi c the diet, dietary comparison groups utilized in studies may alsoaffectresults.Althoughavegandietisassociatedwithsomehealthbene fi ts,thelevelofsupport for the bene fi t varied according to the health outcome being measured, with evidence emerging that BMI is an important mediator and geography and to a lesser extent sex are important moderators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Dietary Supplements\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/nds.s191793\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Dietary Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/nds.s191793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Dietary Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/nds.s191793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

:为了评估素食对健康的益处,对糖尿病(非胰岛素依赖型;NIDDM)、癌症、死亡率、微量营养素、高血压、血脂和超重进行了观察性研究。利用PRISMA项目来识别文章并评估其纳入质量,44项研究被筛选到综述中。在两项独立的研究中,当调整BMI的影响时,纯素食者被诊断为“任何”癌症或特定癌症的风险都没有降低。当数据被聚合时,癌症的风险降低了。与杂食动物相比,素食者的总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平较低,在某些情况下,与其他饮食组相比。在美国,NIDDM和西方国家的诊断风险降低,素食者的BMI较低。与杂食动物相比,素食者诊断女性癌症的风险降低、死亡率提高、血压降低、甘油三酯降低以及微生物组更健康的研究支持是不一致的。没有证据表明纯素食者的特定癌症发病率降低,尽管样本量不足阻碍了这些分析。纯素食者的HDL-C水平低于杂食者,或者与杂食者没有显著差异。地理位置是一个强有力的调节因素,最有力的证据表明来自美国的饮食和饮食具有优势,而在台湾、印度和越南,其益处的证据要少得多。在某些情况下,性别调节了采用饮食和健康结果之间的联系。具体到饮食,研究中使用的饮食比较组也可能影响结果。尽管平均体重与某些健康益处有关,但对益处的支持程度因所测量的健康结果而异,有证据表明,BMI是一个重要的中介因素,地理因素和性别在较小程度上是重要的调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Benefits of a Vegan Diet: Current Insights
: To assess the health bene fi ts of a vegan diet, observational studies of diabetes (non-insulindependent;NIDDM),cancer,mortality,gutmicrobiota,hypertension,lipids,andoverweight were examined. Utilizing PRISMA items to identify articles and assess their quality for inclusion, 44 studies were screened into the review. In two separate studies, vegans did not have a reduced risk of diagnosis of “ any ” cancer, nor of speci fi c cancers when the effects of BMI were adjusted. When datawereaggregated,therewasareducedriskofanycancer.Veganshadlowertotalcholesteroland LDL-C levels compared to omnivores, and in some cases other dietary groups. In the US, there was areduced riskofadiagnosisofNIDDMandinWesterncountries,veganshad lowerBMI.Research support for reduced risk of diagnosis of female cancers, improved mortality rates, lower blood pressure, lower triglycerides, and a healthier microbiome for vegans compared to omnivores was inconsistent. There was no evidence that reduced speci fi c cancer incidence rates were lower in vegans although inadequate sample sizes had hampered these analyses. In vegans, HDL-C levels were either lower or not signi fi cantly different from omnivores. Geographic location was a strong moderatorwiththemostcompellingevidenceforthehealthadvantagesofavegandietcomingfrom the US, whereas in Taiwan, India and Vietnam, there was much less evidence of its bene fi t. In some instances, sex moderated the association between adopting the diet and health outcomes. speci fi c the diet, dietary comparison groups utilized in studies may alsoaffectresults.Althoughavegandietisassociatedwithsomehealthbene fi ts,thelevelofsupport for the bene fi t varied according to the health outcome being measured, with evidence emerging that BMI is an important mediator and geography and to a lesser extent sex are important moderators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition and Dietary Supplements is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on research into nutritional requirements in health and disease, impact on metabolism and the identification and optimal use of dietary strategies and supplements necessary for normal growth and development. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Epidemiology, prevalence of related disorders such as obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemias Biochemistry and cellular metabolism of nutrients Effect of nutrition on metabolic control Impact of hormones and genetics on nutrient handling Identification of cofactors and development of effective supplementation strategies Dietary strategies Behavior modification Consumer and patient adherence, quality of life Public Health Policy & Health Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信