国际组织在劳资纠纷中的豁免权:国际法庭、国家法院和哥伦比亚管辖权的事态发展

Q4 Social Sciences
Walter Arévalo-Ramírez, Ricardo Abello-Galvis
{"title":"国际组织在劳资纠纷中的豁免权:国际法庭、国家法院和哥伦比亚管辖权的事态发展","authors":"Walter Arévalo-Ramírez, Ricardo Abello-Galvis","doi":"10.5102/rdi.v18i1.7264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to analyze and explain the recent developments and challenges regarding the jurisdictional immunity of international organizations in labour disputes, both by international and national courts, concluding with remarks on the experience of the Colombian case law in the matter. The article uses both case-law review and comparative law methodologies to first explain the main differences between diplomatic immunity and the immunity of international organizations regarding labour disputes, then, it describes the current legal trends regarding the applicable law to labour relations between international organizations and individuals, and the challenges to the immunity of the organization when disputes arise. The article develops the modern trend of requiring the organization to activate internal dispute resolution mechanisms to uphold its immunity before national courts. Finally, the article studies the incomplete reception of the principles governing the immunity of international organizations by recent Colombian case law. The article concludes that although international case law over the past decade widely recognizes functional immunity and jurisdictional immunity as the governing law in international organizations, it is still a controversial topic that has demanded fast developments regarding the applicable law, the differences with diplomatic immunity as understood by local authorities (expanding on the example of Colombia) and the design of innovative dispute resolution mechanisms within international organizations. \nKeywords: Immunity of international organizations, Diplomatic immunity, Host State, national officials, functional immunity. labour disputes.","PeriodicalId":37377,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The immunity of international organizations in labour disputes: developments before international tribunals, national courts and the Colombian jurisdiction\",\"authors\":\"Walter Arévalo-Ramírez, Ricardo Abello-Galvis\",\"doi\":\"10.5102/rdi.v18i1.7264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article aims to analyze and explain the recent developments and challenges regarding the jurisdictional immunity of international organizations in labour disputes, both by international and national courts, concluding with remarks on the experience of the Colombian case law in the matter. The article uses both case-law review and comparative law methodologies to first explain the main differences between diplomatic immunity and the immunity of international organizations regarding labour disputes, then, it describes the current legal trends regarding the applicable law to labour relations between international organizations and individuals, and the challenges to the immunity of the organization when disputes arise. The article develops the modern trend of requiring the organization to activate internal dispute resolution mechanisms to uphold its immunity before national courts. Finally, the article studies the incomplete reception of the principles governing the immunity of international organizations by recent Colombian case law. The article concludes that although international case law over the past decade widely recognizes functional immunity and jurisdictional immunity as the governing law in international organizations, it is still a controversial topic that has demanded fast developments regarding the applicable law, the differences with diplomatic immunity as understood by local authorities (expanding on the example of Colombia) and the design of innovative dispute resolution mechanisms within international organizations. \\nKeywords: Immunity of international organizations, Diplomatic immunity, Host State, national officials, functional immunity. labour disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v18i1.7264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v18i1.7264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析和解释国际法院和国家法院关于国际组织在劳动争议中的管辖豁免的最新发展和挑战,并总结哥伦比亚判例法在这方面的经验。本文运用判例法和比较法两种方法,首先解释了外交豁免和国际组织在劳动争议方面的豁免之间的主要区别,然后描述了国际组织和个人之间劳动关系适用法律的当前法律趋势,以及在发生争端时对该组织豁免提出的挑战。该条款发展了要求该组织启动内部争端解决机制以在国家法院维护其豁免权的现代趋势。最后,文章研究了哥伦比亚最近的判例法对国际组织豁免原则的不完全接受。文章的结论是,尽管在过去十年中,国际判例法广泛承认功能豁免和管辖豁免是国际组织的管辖法,但这仍然是一个有争议的话题,需要在适用法律方面迅速发展,与地方当局所理解的外交豁免之间的差异(以哥伦比亚为例),以及国际组织内创新性争端解决机制的设计。关键词:国际组织豁免、外交豁免、东道国、国家官员、职能豁免。劳动争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The immunity of international organizations in labour disputes: developments before international tribunals, national courts and the Colombian jurisdiction
The article aims to analyze and explain the recent developments and challenges regarding the jurisdictional immunity of international organizations in labour disputes, both by international and national courts, concluding with remarks on the experience of the Colombian case law in the matter. The article uses both case-law review and comparative law methodologies to first explain the main differences between diplomatic immunity and the immunity of international organizations regarding labour disputes, then, it describes the current legal trends regarding the applicable law to labour relations between international organizations and individuals, and the challenges to the immunity of the organization when disputes arise. The article develops the modern trend of requiring the organization to activate internal dispute resolution mechanisms to uphold its immunity before national courts. Finally, the article studies the incomplete reception of the principles governing the immunity of international organizations by recent Colombian case law. The article concludes that although international case law over the past decade widely recognizes functional immunity and jurisdictional immunity as the governing law in international organizations, it is still a controversial topic that has demanded fast developments regarding the applicable law, the differences with diplomatic immunity as understood by local authorities (expanding on the example of Colombia) and the design of innovative dispute resolution mechanisms within international organizations. Keywords: Immunity of international organizations, Diplomatic immunity, Host State, national officials, functional immunity. labour disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of International Law (RDI) was created as a tool for select and publish academic papers related to issues addressed by public and private international law. The Journal has a good ranking according with the Brazilian system (Qualis A1). In the quest for development and construction of critical views about international law, the Brazilian Journal of International Law has two main focus: 1. International protection of the human person: covers issues related to international environmental law, humanitarian law, internationalization of law, in addition to research on the evolution of the law of treaties as a way of expanding the contemporary international law. 2. System of legal integration: regional integration (European Union, Mercorsur, NAFTA, ASEAN), sectoral integration (WTO, ICSID), and others. Thematic issues: We intend to publish thematic issues. It aims to increase interest in the journal and its impact on the area. We apologize to the authors, but articles on other subjects will not be accepted or should expect the numbers on topics related to being appreciated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信