{"title":"我们可以从北极理事会北极海洋合作工作队的表现中学到什么关于海洋治理的知识?","authors":"O. Young","doi":"10.1080/2154896X.2021.1929672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the 2015 Iqaluit Declaration, the Arctic Council created a Task Force on Arctic Marine Cooperation (TFAMC) ‘to assess future needs for a regional seas programme or other mechanism, as appropriate, for increased cooperation in Arctic marine areas,’ and ‘to make recommendations on the nature and scope of any such mechanism.’ After working for two years, the Task Force came back to the council with a request that the TFAMC be renewed for a second two-year term with a more limited mandate focused on coordinating the efforts of the Arctic Council itself, a request approved in the 2017 Fairbanks Declaration. The eventual result was the establishment in 2019 of ‘a SAO-based mechanism to guide the marine work of the Arctic Council and improve coordination on marine issues in the Arctic Council.’ The SMM, whose ongoing place within the family of Arctic Council arrangements remains to be determined, held its first meeting in September-October 2020. Due to the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic, this meeting took the form of a series of webinars held over the course of a month with the overall goal of bringing together marine experts ‘to discuss among themselves, and with the SAOs and Permanent Participants, how the Council and its cooperation partners could jointly pave a way forward on some of the Arctic’s most pressing marine-related issues.’ This article provides a critical assessment of the performance of the TFAMC, asking what we can learn from the work of the task force about Arctic Ocean governance, the role of the Arctic Council in this realm, and the management of regime complexes more generally.","PeriodicalId":52117,"journal":{"name":"Polar Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"269 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2154896X.2021.1929672","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What can we learn about ocean governance from the performance of the Arctic Council’s Task Force on Arctic Marine Cooperation?\",\"authors\":\"O. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2154896X.2021.1929672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the 2015 Iqaluit Declaration, the Arctic Council created a Task Force on Arctic Marine Cooperation (TFAMC) ‘to assess future needs for a regional seas programme or other mechanism, as appropriate, for increased cooperation in Arctic marine areas,’ and ‘to make recommendations on the nature and scope of any such mechanism.’ After working for two years, the Task Force came back to the council with a request that the TFAMC be renewed for a second two-year term with a more limited mandate focused on coordinating the efforts of the Arctic Council itself, a request approved in the 2017 Fairbanks Declaration. The eventual result was the establishment in 2019 of ‘a SAO-based mechanism to guide the marine work of the Arctic Council and improve coordination on marine issues in the Arctic Council.’ The SMM, whose ongoing place within the family of Arctic Council arrangements remains to be determined, held its first meeting in September-October 2020. Due to the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic, this meeting took the form of a series of webinars held over the course of a month with the overall goal of bringing together marine experts ‘to discuss among themselves, and with the SAOs and Permanent Participants, how the Council and its cooperation partners could jointly pave a way forward on some of the Arctic’s most pressing marine-related issues.’ This article provides a critical assessment of the performance of the TFAMC, asking what we can learn from the work of the task force about Arctic Ocean governance, the role of the Arctic Council in this realm, and the management of regime complexes more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"269 - 283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2154896X.2021.1929672\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2021.1929672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2021.1929672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
What can we learn about ocean governance from the performance of the Arctic Council’s Task Force on Arctic Marine Cooperation?
ABSTRACT In the 2015 Iqaluit Declaration, the Arctic Council created a Task Force on Arctic Marine Cooperation (TFAMC) ‘to assess future needs for a regional seas programme or other mechanism, as appropriate, for increased cooperation in Arctic marine areas,’ and ‘to make recommendations on the nature and scope of any such mechanism.’ After working for two years, the Task Force came back to the council with a request that the TFAMC be renewed for a second two-year term with a more limited mandate focused on coordinating the efforts of the Arctic Council itself, a request approved in the 2017 Fairbanks Declaration. The eventual result was the establishment in 2019 of ‘a SAO-based mechanism to guide the marine work of the Arctic Council and improve coordination on marine issues in the Arctic Council.’ The SMM, whose ongoing place within the family of Arctic Council arrangements remains to be determined, held its first meeting in September-October 2020. Due to the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic, this meeting took the form of a series of webinars held over the course of a month with the overall goal of bringing together marine experts ‘to discuss among themselves, and with the SAOs and Permanent Participants, how the Council and its cooperation partners could jointly pave a way forward on some of the Arctic’s most pressing marine-related issues.’ This article provides a critical assessment of the performance of the TFAMC, asking what we can learn from the work of the task force about Arctic Ocean governance, the role of the Arctic Council in this realm, and the management of regime complexes more generally.
Polar JournalArts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍:
Antarctica and the Arctic are of crucial importance to global security. Their governance and the patterns of human interactions there are increasingly contentious; mining, tourism, bioprospecting, and fishing are but a few of the many issues of contention, while environmental concerns such as melting ice sheets have a global impact. The Polar Journal is a forum for the scholarly discussion of polar issues from a social science and humanities perspective and brings together the considerable number of specialists and policy makers working on these crucial regions across multiple disciplines. The journal welcomes papers on polar affairs from all fields of the social sciences and the humanities and is especially interested in publishing policy-relevant research. Each issue of the journal either features articles from different disciplines on polar affairs or is a topical theme from a range of scholarly approaches. Topics include: • Polar governance and policy • Polar history, heritage, and culture • Polar economics • Polar politics • Music, art, and literature of the polar regions • Polar tourism • Polar geography and geopolitics • Polar psychology • Polar archaeology Manuscript types accepted: • Regular articles • Research reports • Opinion pieces • Book Reviews • Conference Reports.