自信的心理健康护理对家庭外护理的儿童有影响吗?一项初步研究

Q2 Social Sciences
Róisín Devlin, R. Jairam, Mona Asghari, V. Eapen
{"title":"自信的心理健康护理对家庭外护理的儿童有影响吗?一项初步研究","authors":"Róisín Devlin, R. Jairam, Mona Asghari, V. Eapen","doi":"10.1177/25161032211064644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Children in out-of-home care (OOHC) experience poor mental health. With the number of Australian children in OOHC rising, accessible and effective interventions are needed to address this escalating predicament. South Western Sydney Child & Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) collaborated with the local statutory child protection agency, developing a specialized assertive mental health team supporting children in OOHC (OOHC MHT). This study outlines the characteristics of the first cohort of children referred to the OOHC MHT and the impact of intervention in improving outcomes, warranting ongoing provision of this service. Methodology: A two-part study was used to compare the psychosocial and emotional wellbeing of children referred to the OOHC MHT (OOHC group) against CAMHS-referred children who had not experienced OOHC (Control group). Evaluation of the OOHC MHT’s intervention was conducted by measuring Health of the Nation Outcome Scale-Child and Adolescent (HoNOSCA) and Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) scores over the first year of treatment. Results: The OOHC group demonstrated significantly higher levels of emotional, behavioural and social problems compared to the control group through their HoNOSCA score on admission (OOHC Group: M = 24.9; SD = 5.3, Control Group: M = 16.7; SD = 5.7; p = .001) and CGAS (OOHC Group: M = 40.5; SD = 7.9, Control Group: M = 50.3; SD = 7.9; p = .001). Significant improvements in the OOHC group’s HoNOSCA (T1 = 24.9, T3 = 17.0) and CGAS (T1 = 40.5, T3 = 52.8) measures were observed over the first year of treatment. Conclusion: Children in OOHC referred to CAMHS present with poorer mental health and psychosocial functioning than referred children who have not experienced OOHC. Assertive intervention was associated with improvement in social, emotional and behavioural problems and reduction in psychosocial impairment, suggesting the benefit of such an intervention both state-wide, and nationally.","PeriodicalId":36239,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Child Welfare","volume":"4 1","pages":"73 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does assertive mental health care make a difference to children in out-of-home care? A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Róisín Devlin, R. Jairam, Mona Asghari, V. Eapen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25161032211064644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Children in out-of-home care (OOHC) experience poor mental health. With the number of Australian children in OOHC rising, accessible and effective interventions are needed to address this escalating predicament. South Western Sydney Child & Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) collaborated with the local statutory child protection agency, developing a specialized assertive mental health team supporting children in OOHC (OOHC MHT). This study outlines the characteristics of the first cohort of children referred to the OOHC MHT and the impact of intervention in improving outcomes, warranting ongoing provision of this service. Methodology: A two-part study was used to compare the psychosocial and emotional wellbeing of children referred to the OOHC MHT (OOHC group) against CAMHS-referred children who had not experienced OOHC (Control group). Evaluation of the OOHC MHT’s intervention was conducted by measuring Health of the Nation Outcome Scale-Child and Adolescent (HoNOSCA) and Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) scores over the first year of treatment. Results: The OOHC group demonstrated significantly higher levels of emotional, behavioural and social problems compared to the control group through their HoNOSCA score on admission (OOHC Group: M = 24.9; SD = 5.3, Control Group: M = 16.7; SD = 5.7; p = .001) and CGAS (OOHC Group: M = 40.5; SD = 7.9, Control Group: M = 50.3; SD = 7.9; p = .001). Significant improvements in the OOHC group’s HoNOSCA (T1 = 24.9, T3 = 17.0) and CGAS (T1 = 40.5, T3 = 52.8) measures were observed over the first year of treatment. Conclusion: Children in OOHC referred to CAMHS present with poorer mental health and psychosocial functioning than referred children who have not experienced OOHC. Assertive intervention was associated with improvement in social, emotional and behavioural problems and reduction in psychosocial impairment, suggesting the benefit of such an intervention both state-wide, and nationally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Child Welfare\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Child Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25161032211064644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25161032211064644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:家庭外护理儿童的心理健康状况较差。随着OOHC中澳大利亚儿童人数的增加,需要可获得和有效的干预措施来解决这一不断升级的困境。西南悉尼儿童和青少年心理健康服务中心(CAMHS)与当地法定儿童保护机构合作,建立了一个专门的自信的心理健康团队,为OOHC中的儿童提供支持(OOHC MHT)。本研究概述了OOHC MHT第一批儿童的特征,以及干预对改善结果的影响,保证了这项服务的持续提供。方法:一项两部分的研究用于比较OOHC MHT (OOHC组)和camhs转介的未经历OOHC的儿童(对照组)的心理社会和情感健康。OOHC MHT干预的评估是通过测量治疗第一年的国家健康结果量表-儿童和青少年(HoNOSCA)和儿童全球评估量表(CGAS)得分来进行的。结果:ohhc组入院时的HoNOSCA评分显示,ohhc组的情绪、行为和社会问题水平显著高于对照组(ohhc组:M = 24.9;SD = 5.3,对照组:M = 16.7;Sd = 5.7;p = .001)和CGAS (OOHC组:M = 40.5;SD = 7.9,对照组:M = 50.3;Sd = 7.9;P = .001)。在治疗的第一年,OOHC组的HoNOSCA (T1 = 24.9, T3 = 17.0)和CGAS (T1 = 40.5, T3 = 52.8)指标均有显著改善。结论:与未经历过OOHC的儿童相比,就诊于CAMHS的OOHC儿童的心理健康和社会心理功能较差。自信的干预与社会、情感和行为问题的改善以及心理社会障碍的减少有关,这表明这种干预在全州和全国范围内都是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does assertive mental health care make a difference to children in out-of-home care? A pilot study
Background: Children in out-of-home care (OOHC) experience poor mental health. With the number of Australian children in OOHC rising, accessible and effective interventions are needed to address this escalating predicament. South Western Sydney Child & Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) collaborated with the local statutory child protection agency, developing a specialized assertive mental health team supporting children in OOHC (OOHC MHT). This study outlines the characteristics of the first cohort of children referred to the OOHC MHT and the impact of intervention in improving outcomes, warranting ongoing provision of this service. Methodology: A two-part study was used to compare the psychosocial and emotional wellbeing of children referred to the OOHC MHT (OOHC group) against CAMHS-referred children who had not experienced OOHC (Control group). Evaluation of the OOHC MHT’s intervention was conducted by measuring Health of the Nation Outcome Scale-Child and Adolescent (HoNOSCA) and Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) scores over the first year of treatment. Results: The OOHC group demonstrated significantly higher levels of emotional, behavioural and social problems compared to the control group through their HoNOSCA score on admission (OOHC Group: M = 24.9; SD = 5.3, Control Group: M = 16.7; SD = 5.7; p = .001) and CGAS (OOHC Group: M = 40.5; SD = 7.9, Control Group: M = 50.3; SD = 7.9; p = .001). Significant improvements in the OOHC group’s HoNOSCA (T1 = 24.9, T3 = 17.0) and CGAS (T1 = 40.5, T3 = 52.8) measures were observed over the first year of treatment. Conclusion: Children in OOHC referred to CAMHS present with poorer mental health and psychosocial functioning than referred children who have not experienced OOHC. Assertive intervention was associated with improvement in social, emotional and behavioural problems and reduction in psychosocial impairment, suggesting the benefit of such an intervention both state-wide, and nationally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Child Welfare
Developmental Child Welfare Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信