大流行不会在电车轨道上运行:对埃亚尔文章《当心电车狂热者》的评论

Q3 Social Sciences

Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas Pub Date : 2020-09-18 DOI:10.6092/ISSN.1971-8853/11412

Cansu Canca

{"title":"大流行不会在电车轨道上运行:对埃亚尔文章《当心电车狂热者》的评论","authors":"Cansu Canca","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1971-8853/11412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic raises various ethical questions, one of which is the question of when and how countries should move from lockdown to reopening. In his paper “Beware the Trolley Zealots” (2020), Gil Eyal looks at this question, arguing against a trolley problem approach and utilitarian reasoning. In this commentary, I show that his position suffers from misunderstanding the proposed policies and the trolley problem and asserting moral conclusions without moral justifications.","PeriodicalId":35251,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pandemic Doesn’t Run on Trolley Tracks: A Comment on Eyal's Essay \\\"Beware the Trolley Zealots\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Cansu Canca\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/ISSN.1971-8853/11412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic raises various ethical questions, one of which is the question of when and how countries should move from lockdown to reopening. In his paper “Beware the Trolley Zealots” (2020), Gil Eyal looks at this question, arguing against a trolley problem approach and utilitarian reasoning. In this commentary, I show that his position suffers from misunderstanding the proposed policies and the trolley problem and asserting moral conclusions without moral justifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1971-8853/11412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1971-8853/11412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

COVID-19大流行引发了各种伦理问题，其中一个问题是各国应何时以及如何从封锁转向重新开放。在他的论文“当心电车狂热者”(2020)中，吉尔·埃亚尔(Gil Eyal)研究了这个问题，反对电车问题方法和功利主义推理。在这篇评论中，我表明他的立场受到了对拟议政策和电车问题的误解，并在没有道德理由的情况下断言道德结论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Pandemic Doesn’t Run on Trolley Tracks: A Comment on Eyal's Essay "Beware the Trolley Zealots"

The COVID-19 pandemic raises various ethical questions, one of which is the question of when and how countries should move from lockdown to reopening. In his paper “Beware the Trolley Zealots” (2020), Gil Eyal looks at this question, arguing against a trolley problem approach and utilitarian reasoning. In this commentary, I show that his position suffers from misunderstanding the proposed policies and the trolley problem and asserting moral conclusions without moral justifications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks