挑战荒谬?

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
Jo Bogaerts
{"title":"挑战荒谬?","authors":"Jo Bogaerts","doi":"10.3167/SSI.2018.240103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1943, Jean-Paul Sartre published several important\narticles of literary criticism on Blanchot, Camus and Bataille. In\naddition to propounding his own literary views, these articles functioned\nas a means of marking out his own version of existentialism,\nwhich risked being conflated with the Camusian absurd. Whereas\nCamus, according to Sartre, advocated a detached attitude in the\nface of the meaninglessness of existence, Sartre maintained that the\nsubject cannot withdraw from the (historical) situation and that existence\nis ultimately meaningful. One author in particular, Franz\nKafka, acts as the figurative ‘prism’ through which Sartre challenges\nrival versions of existential thinking. He does so by introducing the\nconcept of le fantastique (the fantastic) on account of Kafka’s work.\nIn so doing, Sartre not only rebutted the dominant interpretation,\naccording to which Kafka was an absurd author, but also uncovered\na historical critique implicit in the Prague author’s work.","PeriodicalId":41680,"journal":{"name":"Sartre Studies International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/SSI.2018.240103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging the Absurd?\",\"authors\":\"Jo Bogaerts\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/SSI.2018.240103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1943, Jean-Paul Sartre published several important\\narticles of literary criticism on Blanchot, Camus and Bataille. In\\naddition to propounding his own literary views, these articles functioned\\nas a means of marking out his own version of existentialism,\\nwhich risked being conflated with the Camusian absurd. Whereas\\nCamus, according to Sartre, advocated a detached attitude in the\\nface of the meaninglessness of existence, Sartre maintained that the\\nsubject cannot withdraw from the (historical) situation and that existence\\nis ultimately meaningful. One author in particular, Franz\\nKafka, acts as the figurative ‘prism’ through which Sartre challenges\\nrival versions of existential thinking. He does so by introducing the\\nconcept of le fantastique (the fantastic) on account of Kafka’s work.\\nIn so doing, Sartre not only rebutted the dominant interpretation,\\naccording to which Kafka was an absurd author, but also uncovered\\na historical critique implicit in the Prague author’s work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sartre Studies International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/SSI.2018.240103\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sartre Studies International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/SSI.2018.240103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sartre Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/SSI.2018.240103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1943年,让-保罗·萨特发表了几篇关于布朗肖、加缪和巴塔耶的重要文学批评文章。除了提出自己的文学观点外,这些文章还作为一种手段,标记出他自己的存在主义版本,这可能与卡缪的荒谬相混淆。根据萨特的观点,加缪在面对存在的无意义时主张一种超然的态度,而萨特则认为主体不能退出(历史)情境,存在最终是有意义的。尤其是一位作家,弗兰兹·卡夫卡(FranzKafka),他就像一个比喻的“棱镜”,通过这个棱镜,萨特挑战了存在主义思维的竞争版本。他根据卡夫卡的作品引入了“梦幻”(le fantastique)的概念。通过这样做,萨特不仅反驳了卡夫卡是一个荒谬作家的主流解释,而且揭示了隐含在布拉格作家作品中的历史批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenging the Absurd?
In 1943, Jean-Paul Sartre published several important articles of literary criticism on Blanchot, Camus and Bataille. In addition to propounding his own literary views, these articles functioned as a means of marking out his own version of existentialism, which risked being conflated with the Camusian absurd. Whereas Camus, according to Sartre, advocated a detached attitude in the face of the meaninglessness of existence, Sartre maintained that the subject cannot withdraw from the (historical) situation and that existence is ultimately meaningful. One author in particular, Franz Kafka, acts as the figurative ‘prism’ through which Sartre challenges rival versions of existential thinking. He does so by introducing the concept of le fantastique (the fantastic) on account of Kafka’s work. In so doing, Sartre not only rebutted the dominant interpretation, according to which Kafka was an absurd author, but also uncovered a historical critique implicit in the Prague author’s work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信