终身监禁与人的尊严

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW

REVISTA REPUBLICANA Pub Date : 2021-02-28 DOI:10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a103

S. Cuneo

{"title":"终身监禁与人的尊严","authors":"S. Cuneo","doi":"10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recognition of human dignity and respect for fundamental human rights cannot be restricted to a single category of human beings. The idea that anyone could be considered non-persona, to whom an “Enemy criminal law” may be applied, is incompatible with an ultima ratio liberal notion of penal law. \nThe humanisation of criminal law is manifested in the growing number of contemporary societies that have abolished or limited the death penalty. Nevertheless, life or long-term imprisonment sentences still prevail, and are on the rise, despite lacking theoretical or philosophical justification in the laws that prescribe them. \nIn this article we will attempt to answer various questions regarding a possible justification for life imprisonment. Different theories will be examined regarding the goals of sentencing in order to determine, on discussing each theory, whether it is possible to justify life imprisonment or other long-term incarceration. \nDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a103","PeriodicalId":40477,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA REPUBLICANA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LIFE IMPRISONMENT AND HUMAN DIGNITY\",\"authors\":\"S. Cuneo\",\"doi\":\"10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recognition of human dignity and respect for fundamental human rights cannot be restricted to a single category of human beings. The idea that anyone could be considered non-persona, to whom an “Enemy criminal law” may be applied, is incompatible with an ultima ratio liberal notion of penal law. \\nThe humanisation of criminal law is manifested in the growing number of contemporary societies that have abolished or limited the death penalty. Nevertheless, life or long-term imprisonment sentences still prevail, and are on the rise, despite lacking theoretical or philosophical justification in the laws that prescribe them. \\nIn this article we will attempt to answer various questions regarding a possible justification for life imprisonment. Different theories will be examined regarding the goals of sentencing in order to determine, on discussing each theory, whether it is possible to justify life imprisonment or other long-term incarceration. \\nDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a103\",\"PeriodicalId\":40477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVISTA REPUBLICANA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVISTA REPUBLICANA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA REPUBLICANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对人的尊严的承认和对基本人权的尊重不能仅限于一类人。任何人都可以被视为非人格，“敌方刑法”可能适用于这种人，这与刑法的终极自由概念是不相容的。刑法的人性化体现在越来越多的当代社会废除或限制了死刑。尽管如此，尽管规定终身监禁或长期监禁的法律缺乏理论或哲学依据，但终身监禁或终身监禁的判决仍然普遍存在，而且还在上升。在这篇文章中，我们将试图回答关于终身监禁的可能理由的各种问题。关于量刑目标，将审查不同的理论，以便在讨论每一种理论时，确定是否有可能为终身监禁或其他长期监禁辩护。DOI：http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a103

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

LIFE IMPRISONMENT AND HUMAN DIGNITY

Recognition of human dignity and respect for fundamental human rights cannot be restricted to a single category of human beings. The idea that anyone could be considered non-persona, to whom an “Enemy criminal law” may be applied, is incompatible with an ultima ratio liberal notion of penal law. The humanisation of criminal law is manifested in the growing number of contemporary societies that have abolished or limited the death penalty. Nevertheless, life or long-term imprisonment sentences still prevail, and are on the rise, despite lacking theoretical or philosophical justification in the laws that prescribe them. In this article we will attempt to answer various questions regarding a possible justification for life imprisonment. Different theories will be examined regarding the goals of sentencing in order to determine, on discussing each theory, whether it is possible to justify life imprisonment or other long-term incarceration. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a103

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

REVISTA REPUBLICANA LAW-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： La Revista Republicana es una publicación semestral del Centro de Investigaciones de la Corporación Universitaria Republicana, institución universitaria ubicada en Bogotá D.C, Colombia. Tiene el propósito de visibilizar la producción académica de investigadores nacionales e internacionales concretada en artículos científicos que deben ser inéditos, resultado de proyectos de investigación preferiblemente terminados; en temas relacionados con el derecho y las ciencias sociales.