通过简化手部和上肢手术的病人转移来提高手术室效率

Q2 Nursing
Celine Yeung, Ryan W. Schmucker
{"title":"通过简化手部和上肢手术的病人转移来提高手术室效率","authors":"Celine Yeung,&nbsp;Ryan W. Schmucker","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2023.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inefficiencies in the OR such as slow patient transfers can have a negative financial impact and affect patient safety. This study sought to determine whether decreasing the number of patient transfers in hand, wrist, and elbow surgery can improve patient flow from the time they arrive in the operating room to the time they arrive in the post-operative anesthetic unit (PACU).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Elective cases performed between April to August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed at two surgical centers. The pre-operative wait time (arrival time into the OR to the start of surgery); post-operative transfer time (end of surgery to when the patient leaves the OR); emergence time (when the patient leaves the OR to arrival in the PACU; and total patient flow time (entry into OR until arrival in PACU) were analyzed. Data from procedures where patients remained on their surgical bed (group 1) were compared against procedures where patients were transferred to and from the OR table (group 2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 259 cases (group 1 <em>n</em> = 191, group 2 <em>n</em> = 68 cases) were collected. There were significant differences between: the pre-operative wait time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; 95% CI, 15:40 to 17:36); post-operative transfer time (<em>p</em> = 0.001; 95% CI, 3:25 to 5:59); emergence time (<em>p</em> = 0.02; 95% CI, 1:36 to 2:02); and total flow time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; 95% CI, 1:05:39 to 1:21:20). The average differences between the two groups in each phase are 3–9 min. There was no difference between the types of procedures performed (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05); the average difference in total flow time was 50 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Keeping patients on the same surgical bed for hand, wrist, and elbow procedures can help maximize OR efficiency in an outpatient ambulatory care setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving OR efficiency by streamlining patient transfer in hand and upper extremity surgery\",\"authors\":\"Celine Yeung,&nbsp;Ryan W. Schmucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcorm.2023.100325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inefficiencies in the OR such as slow patient transfers can have a negative financial impact and affect patient safety. This study sought to determine whether decreasing the number of patient transfers in hand, wrist, and elbow surgery can improve patient flow from the time they arrive in the operating room to the time they arrive in the post-operative anesthetic unit (PACU).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Elective cases performed between April to August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed at two surgical centers. The pre-operative wait time (arrival time into the OR to the start of surgery); post-operative transfer time (end of surgery to when the patient leaves the OR); emergence time (when the patient leaves the OR to arrival in the PACU; and total patient flow time (entry into OR until arrival in PACU) were analyzed. Data from procedures where patients remained on their surgical bed (group 1) were compared against procedures where patients were transferred to and from the OR table (group 2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 259 cases (group 1 <em>n</em> = 191, group 2 <em>n</em> = 68 cases) were collected. There were significant differences between: the pre-operative wait time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; 95% CI, 15:40 to 17:36); post-operative transfer time (<em>p</em> = 0.001; 95% CI, 3:25 to 5:59); emergence time (<em>p</em> = 0.02; 95% CI, 1:36 to 2:02); and total flow time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; 95% CI, 1:05:39 to 1:21:20). The average differences between the two groups in each phase are 3–9 min. There was no difference between the types of procedures performed (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05); the average difference in total flow time was 50 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Keeping patients on the same surgical bed for hand, wrist, and elbow procedures can help maximize OR efficiency in an outpatient ambulatory care setting.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603023000201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603023000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景手术室效率低下,如患者转移缓慢,可能会产生负面的财务影响,并影响患者的安全。本研究旨在确定减少手部、手腕和肘部手术中的患者转移次数是否可以改善患者从到达手术室到到达术后麻醉室(PACU)的流量。方法回顾性回顾2022年4月至8月在两个手术中心进行的选择性病例。术前等待时间(到达手术室到手术开始的时间);术后转移时间(手术结束至患者离开手术室);分析了出现时间(患者离开手术室到达PACU时)和总患者流动时间(进入手术室直到到达PACU)。将患者留在手术床上的手术数据(第1组)与将患者转移到OR表和从OR表转移的手术(第2组)进行比较。术前等待时间(p<0.001;95%可信区间,15:40~17:36);术后转移时间(p=0.001;95%可信区间,3:25至5:59);羽化时间(p=0.02;95%可信区间,1:36至2:02);和总流动时间(p<0.001;95%CI,1:05:39至1:21:20)。两组在每个阶段的平均差异为3–9分钟。所执行的程序类型之间没有差异(p>0.05);总流动时间的平均差异为50分钟。结论在门诊门诊护理环境中,让患者在同一张手术床上进行手、腕和肘关节手术有助于最大限度地提高OR效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving OR efficiency by streamlining patient transfer in hand and upper extremity surgery

Background

Inefficiencies in the OR such as slow patient transfers can have a negative financial impact and affect patient safety. This study sought to determine whether decreasing the number of patient transfers in hand, wrist, and elbow surgery can improve patient flow from the time they arrive in the operating room to the time they arrive in the post-operative anesthetic unit (PACU).

Methods

Elective cases performed between April to August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed at two surgical centers. The pre-operative wait time (arrival time into the OR to the start of surgery); post-operative transfer time (end of surgery to when the patient leaves the OR); emergence time (when the patient leaves the OR to arrival in the PACU; and total patient flow time (entry into OR until arrival in PACU) were analyzed. Data from procedures where patients remained on their surgical bed (group 1) were compared against procedures where patients were transferred to and from the OR table (group 2).

Results

Data from 259 cases (group 1 n = 191, group 2 n = 68 cases) were collected. There were significant differences between: the pre-operative wait time (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 15:40 to 17:36); post-operative transfer time (p = 0.001; 95% CI, 3:25 to 5:59); emergence time (p = 0.02; 95% CI, 1:36 to 2:02); and total flow time (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 1:05:39 to 1:21:20). The average differences between the two groups in each phase are 3–9 min. There was no difference between the types of procedures performed (p > 0.05); the average difference in total flow time was 50 min.

Conclusions

Keeping patients on the same surgical bed for hand, wrist, and elbow procedures can help maximize OR efficiency in an outpatient ambulatory care setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信