用消费者剩余来约束非市场商品的支付意愿

IF 2.6 3区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Resource and Energy Economics Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101276

Jon R. Neill

{"title":"用消费者剩余来约束非市场商品的支付意愿","authors":"Jon R. Neill","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Measuring willingness to pay for non-market goods continues to be problematic for the benefit-cost analyst. This note presents a new procedure for placing a lower bound on that value. The measure identified herein offers the advantage of not requiring any assumptions that are not empirically verifiable, and can be taken using the market demand schedule for any good that has the quantity of the non-market good consumed as an argument.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47952,"journal":{"name":"Resource and Energy Economics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using consumer’s surplus to bound willingness to pay for non-market goods\",\"authors\":\"Jon R. Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Measuring willingness to pay for non-market goods continues to be problematic for the benefit-cost analyst. This note presents a new procedure for placing a lower bound on that value. The measure identified herein offers the advantage of not requiring any assumptions that are not empirically verifiable, and can be taken using the market demand schedule for any good that has the quantity of the non-market good consumed as an argument.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource and Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource and Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765521000610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource and Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765521000610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

衡量购买非市场商品的意愿对收益成本分析师来说仍然是个问题。本文介绍了一个为该值设置下界的新过程。本文确定的测量方法的优点是不需要任何未经经验验证的假设，并且可以使用任何商品的市场需求表，以非市场商品的消费量作为参数。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Using consumer’s surplus to bound willingness to pay for non-market goods

Measuring willingness to pay for non-market goods continues to be problematic for the benefit-cost analyst. This note presents a new procedure for placing a lower bound on that value. The measure identified herein offers the advantage of not requiring any assumptions that are not empirically verifiable, and can be taken using the market demand schedule for any good that has the quantity of the non-market good consumed as an argument.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Resource and Energy Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Resource and Energy Economics provides a forum for high level economic analysis of utilization and development of the earth natural resources. The subject matter encompasses questions of optimal production and consumption affecting energy, minerals, land, air and water, and includes analysis of firm and industry behavior, environmental issues and public policies. Implications for both developed and developing countries are of concern. The journal publishes high quality papers for an international audience. Innovative energy, resource and environmental analyses, including theoretical models and empirical studies are appropriate for publication in Resource and Energy Economics.