Malinda S. Tan , Kibum Kim , Cody J. Olsen , Diana I. Brixner
{"title":"强化治疗对两种口服抗糖尿病药物无效的亚控制型2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响","authors":"Malinda S. Tan , Kibum Kim , Cody J. Olsen , Diana I. Brixner","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Treatment intensification (TI) may help patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) achieve target hemoglobin A1c (A1c) < 7.0%. This study aimed to measure the influence of TI on A1c outcome in patients who insufficiently responded to two classes of oral antidiabetic drugs (2OADs).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective observational study of patients with T2DM was performed using health plan claims and A1c records accrued between January 2010 and March 2017. The study population had an A1c ≥ 7.0% (baseline A1c) after treatment with 2OADs for one year. Patients who had TI with a third-class antidiabetic agent, including basal/biphasic insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), or OAD, within 365 days after baseline A1c were included. Patients who did not receive TI (NTI) within one year from the suboptimal A1c control were matched with TI patients using a propensity score approach. The odds ratio of achieving an A1c < 9.0% and < 7.0% for TI vs. NTI were calculated by logistic regressions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A1c values of 401 TI − NTI matched pairs were analyzed. TI patients achieved a significantly lower follow-up A1c than NTI patients (7.79% ± 1.45 vs. 8.02% ± 1.67, <em>p</em> = 0.03). The odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of achieving A1c < 9.0% and < 7.0% for TI was 1.50 [1.04−2.17] and 1.19 [0.87−1.63], respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TI with a third-class agent further reduced A1c levels in patients whose A1c insufficiently responded with 2OADs; however, most patients failed to achieve an A1c < 7.0% on the intensified treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of treatment intensification on glycemic control in patients with subcontrolled type 2 diabetes who failed on two oral antidiabetic agents\",\"authors\":\"Malinda S. Tan , Kibum Kim , Cody J. Olsen , Diana I. Brixner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Treatment intensification (TI) may help patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) achieve target hemoglobin A1c (A1c) < 7.0%. This study aimed to measure the influence of TI on A1c outcome in patients who insufficiently responded to two classes of oral antidiabetic drugs (2OADs).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective observational study of patients with T2DM was performed using health plan claims and A1c records accrued between January 2010 and March 2017. The study population had an A1c ≥ 7.0% (baseline A1c) after treatment with 2OADs for one year. Patients who had TI with a third-class antidiabetic agent, including basal/biphasic insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), or OAD, within 365 days after baseline A1c were included. Patients who did not receive TI (NTI) within one year from the suboptimal A1c control were matched with TI patients using a propensity score approach. The odds ratio of achieving an A1c < 9.0% and < 7.0% for TI vs. NTI were calculated by logistic regressions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A1c values of 401 TI − NTI matched pairs were analyzed. TI patients achieved a significantly lower follow-up A1c than NTI patients (7.79% ± 1.45 vs. 8.02% ± 1.67, <em>p</em> = 0.03). The odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of achieving A1c < 9.0% and < 7.0% for TI was 1.50 [1.04−2.17] and 1.19 [0.87−1.63], respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TI with a third-class agent further reduced A1c levels in patients whose A1c insufficiently responded with 2OADs; however, most patients failed to achieve an A1c < 7.0% on the intensified treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of treatment intensification on glycemic control in patients with subcontrolled type 2 diabetes who failed on two oral antidiabetic agents
Aims
Treatment intensification (TI) may help patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) achieve target hemoglobin A1c (A1c) < 7.0%. This study aimed to measure the influence of TI on A1c outcome in patients who insufficiently responded to two classes of oral antidiabetic drugs (2OADs).
Materials and methods
A retrospective observational study of patients with T2DM was performed using health plan claims and A1c records accrued between January 2010 and March 2017. The study population had an A1c ≥ 7.0% (baseline A1c) after treatment with 2OADs for one year. Patients who had TI with a third-class antidiabetic agent, including basal/biphasic insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), or OAD, within 365 days after baseline A1c were included. Patients who did not receive TI (NTI) within one year from the suboptimal A1c control were matched with TI patients using a propensity score approach. The odds ratio of achieving an A1c < 9.0% and < 7.0% for TI vs. NTI were calculated by logistic regressions.
Results
A1c values of 401 TI − NTI matched pairs were analyzed. TI patients achieved a significantly lower follow-up A1c than NTI patients (7.79% ± 1.45 vs. 8.02% ± 1.67, p = 0.03). The odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of achieving A1c < 9.0% and < 7.0% for TI was 1.50 [1.04−2.17] and 1.19 [0.87−1.63], respectively.
Conclusion
TI with a third-class agent further reduced A1c levels in patients whose A1c insufficiently responded with 2OADs; however, most patients failed to achieve an A1c < 7.0% on the intensified treatment.