修订大洋洲的贝壳分析:所罗门群岛藏品研究的多方面方法

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
CHARLES JAMES TEKARAWA RADCLYFFE
{"title":"修订大洋洲的贝壳分析:所罗门群岛藏品研究的多方面方法","authors":"CHARLES JAMES TEKARAWA RADCLYFFE","doi":"10.1002/arco.5231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Shell adzes, although one of the more common artefacts in the Pacific, have not received nearly the same attention by archaeologists as have stone adzes in the region. Large collections of the latter have been studied in detail for over a century, and researchers have developed consistent methodological approaches, terminology and classification for their analysis. This has not been the case for shell adzes. This paper provides a critical review of this issue and puts forward a multifaceted approach, including a revised set of classificatory criteria, that is applied to the descriptive analysis of two museum collections of shell adzes and other cutting implements from Solomon Islands. The analysis demonstrates that incorporating technological, functional and ecological factors in the description and classification of shell adzes can generate a more insightful understanding of the various ways these cutting implements were made and used in the past.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"56 2","pages":"111-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/arco.5231","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revising shell adze analysis in Oceania: a multifaceted approach to the study of a Solomon Islands’ collection\",\"authors\":\"CHARLES JAMES TEKARAWA RADCLYFFE\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/arco.5231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Shell adzes, although one of the more common artefacts in the Pacific, have not received nearly the same attention by archaeologists as have stone adzes in the region. Large collections of the latter have been studied in detail for over a century, and researchers have developed consistent methodological approaches, terminology and classification for their analysis. This has not been the case for shell adzes. This paper provides a critical review of this issue and puts forward a multifaceted approach, including a revised set of classificatory criteria, that is applied to the descriptive analysis of two museum collections of shell adzes and other cutting implements from Solomon Islands. The analysis demonstrates that incorporating technological, functional and ecological factors in the description and classification of shell adzes can generate a more insightful understanding of the various ways these cutting implements were made and used in the past.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeology in Oceania\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"111-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/arco.5231\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeology in Oceania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arco.5231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology in Oceania","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arco.5231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管贝壳小壶是太平洋地区较为常见的人工制品之一,但考古学家对该地区的石小壶的关注却远远不及它们。对后者的大量收集已经进行了一个多世纪的详细研究,研究人员已经为他们的分析开发了一致的方法方法、术语和分类。但对于炮弹炮弹来说,情况并非如此。本文对这一问题进行了批判性的回顾,并提出了一种多方面的方法,包括一套修订的分类标准,用于对所罗门群岛两个博物馆收藏的贝壳工具和其他切割工具进行描述性分析。分析表明,将技术、功能和生态因素纳入贝壳刀具的描述和分类中,可以更深刻地了解这些刀具在过去的各种制造和使用方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revising shell adze analysis in Oceania: a multifaceted approach to the study of a Solomon Islands’ collection

Shell adzes, although one of the more common artefacts in the Pacific, have not received nearly the same attention by archaeologists as have stone adzes in the region. Large collections of the latter have been studied in detail for over a century, and researchers have developed consistent methodological approaches, terminology and classification for their analysis. This has not been the case for shell adzes. This paper provides a critical review of this issue and puts forward a multifaceted approach, including a revised set of classificatory criteria, that is applied to the descriptive analysis of two museum collections of shell adzes and other cutting implements from Solomon Islands. The analysis demonstrates that incorporating technological, functional and ecological factors in the description and classification of shell adzes can generate a more insightful understanding of the various ways these cutting implements were made and used in the past.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Archaeology in Oceania is published online and in print versions three times a year: April, July, October. It accepts articles and research reports in prehistoric and historical archaeology, modern material culture and human biology of ancient and modern human populations. Its primary geographic focus is Australia, the islands of the Pacific Ocean and lands of the western Pacific rim. All articles and research reports accepted as being within the remit of the journal and of appropriate standard will be reviewed by two scholars; authors will be informed of these comments though not necessarily of the reviewer’s names.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信