两种免疫层析快速检测PCR确认的产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌的性能比较

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
{"title":"两种免疫层析快速检测PCR确认的产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌的性能比较","authors":"","doi":"10.33263/briac134.322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) tend to dominate the infectious pathology, often due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains and evolving with severe, complicated, and difficult-to-treat clinical forms. This study aimed to investigate by phenotypic and genotypic assays a representative set of carbapenem-resistant GNB strains to evaluate their contribution to appropriate epidemiological surveillance and therapy of associated infections. A number of 70 Enterobacterales MDR bacterial strains were consecutively isolated from patients with different infections (79 %) and carriers (rectal portages, 21 %) hospitalized at the Fundeni Clinical Institute from November 2017 - April 2018. The strains, previously characterized by PCR, were investigated comparatively by two immunochromatographic tests, NG-Test Carba 5 and RESIST-3 O.K.N., able to detect KPC, OXA-48 like NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48 like, KPC, NDM, respectively. KPC was the main carbapenemase detected (37 %), followed by OXA-48 (30 %). Both rapid immunochromatographic tests demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, the results being 100 % concordant with the results of the PCR method. The immunochromatographic assay is, therefore, a cheap and reliable method for the rapid detection, within 15 minutes, of carbapenemase-producing strains. Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases is significant for clinical and epidemiological purposes, infection control, and antimicrobial therapy's effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":9026,"journal":{"name":"Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Performance of Two Immunochromatographic Tests for the Rapid Detection of PCR Confirmed, Carbapenemase Producing-Enterobacterales\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33263/briac134.322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) tend to dominate the infectious pathology, often due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains and evolving with severe, complicated, and difficult-to-treat clinical forms. This study aimed to investigate by phenotypic and genotypic assays a representative set of carbapenem-resistant GNB strains to evaluate their contribution to appropriate epidemiological surveillance and therapy of associated infections. A number of 70 Enterobacterales MDR bacterial strains were consecutively isolated from patients with different infections (79 %) and carriers (rectal portages, 21 %) hospitalized at the Fundeni Clinical Institute from November 2017 - April 2018. The strains, previously characterized by PCR, were investigated comparatively by two immunochromatographic tests, NG-Test Carba 5 and RESIST-3 O.K.N., able to detect KPC, OXA-48 like NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48 like, KPC, NDM, respectively. KPC was the main carbapenemase detected (37 %), followed by OXA-48 (30 %). Both rapid immunochromatographic tests demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, the results being 100 % concordant with the results of the PCR method. The immunochromatographic assay is, therefore, a cheap and reliable method for the rapid detection, within 15 minutes, of carbapenemase-producing strains. Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases is significant for clinical and epidemiological purposes, infection control, and antimicrobial therapy's effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33263/briac134.322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33263/briac134.322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)往往在感染病理中占主导地位,通常是由于多药耐药(MDR)菌株,并演变成严重、复杂和难以治疗的临床形式。本研究旨在通过表型和基因型分析研究一组具有代表性的耐碳青霉烯GNB菌株,以评估其对适当的流行病学监测和相关感染治疗的贡献。从2017年11月至2018年4月在Fundeni临床研究所住院的不同感染患者(79%)和携带者(21%)中连续分离出70株肠杆菌耐多药菌株。采用NG-Test Carba 5和resistance -3 O.K.N.两种免疫层析检测方法,分别检测KPC、OXA-48样NDM、VIM、IMP和OXA-48样KPC、NDM。检测到的碳青霉烯酶以KPC酶为主(37%),其次是OXA-48酶(30%)。两种快速免疫层析试验均表现出较高的灵敏度和特异性,结果与PCR方法的结果100%一致。因此,免疫层析法是一种廉价而可靠的方法,可在15分钟内快速检测产生碳青霉烯酶的菌株。快速准确地鉴定碳青霉烯酶对临床和流行病学目的、感染控制和抗菌治疗的有效性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Performance of Two Immunochromatographic Tests for the Rapid Detection of PCR Confirmed, Carbapenemase Producing-Enterobacterales
The Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) tend to dominate the infectious pathology, often due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains and evolving with severe, complicated, and difficult-to-treat clinical forms. This study aimed to investigate by phenotypic and genotypic assays a representative set of carbapenem-resistant GNB strains to evaluate their contribution to appropriate epidemiological surveillance and therapy of associated infections. A number of 70 Enterobacterales MDR bacterial strains were consecutively isolated from patients with different infections (79 %) and carriers (rectal portages, 21 %) hospitalized at the Fundeni Clinical Institute from November 2017 - April 2018. The strains, previously characterized by PCR, were investigated comparatively by two immunochromatographic tests, NG-Test Carba 5 and RESIST-3 O.K.N., able to detect KPC, OXA-48 like NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48 like, KPC, NDM, respectively. KPC was the main carbapenemase detected (37 %), followed by OXA-48 (30 %). Both rapid immunochromatographic tests demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, the results being 100 % concordant with the results of the PCR method. The immunochromatographic assay is, therefore, a cheap and reliable method for the rapid detection, within 15 minutes, of carbapenemase-producing strains. Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases is significant for clinical and epidemiological purposes, infection control, and antimicrobial therapy's effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
256
期刊介绍: Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry is an international and interdisciplinary research journal that focuses on all aspects of nanoscience, bioscience and applied chemistry. Submissions are solicited in all topical areas, ranging from basic aspects of the science materials to practical applications of such materials. With 6 issues per year, the first one published on the 15th of February of 2011, Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry is an open-access journal, making all research results freely available online. The aim is to publish original papers, short communications as well as review papers highlighting interdisciplinary research, the potential applications of the molecules and materials in the bio-field. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信