封闭式与全程学期设计对物理治疗博士生学习成绩和保留率的影响

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000287
Erin McCallister, Amanda Bernard, Daniel W Flowers, Lauren Rachal Sant
{"title":"封闭式与全程学期设计对物理治疗博士生学习成绩和保留率的影响","authors":"Erin McCallister, Amanda Bernard, Daniel W Flowers, Lauren Rachal Sant","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Restrictions on in-person gatherings during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic required educational programs to explore alternative educational formats. The nature of physical therapy education as a blend of cognitive and psychomotor skill presents additional challenges. During a gradual return to in-person learning, the authors' institution chose to break a full-length 15-week semester into 3, 5-week blocks. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of semester design on course performance. The second aim was to assess the effects of semester design on knowledge and skill retention.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>In undergraduate studies, blocked courses or semesters held over a short period of time may result in equal or better performance compared with courses performed over a longer time. Few studies have been performed on the graduate student population. Most studies have focused on short-term cognitive knowledge acquisition.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Three cohorts of Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students were eligible to participate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two DPT courses (1 first year and 1 second year) were selected to assess cognitive and psychomotor performance. Examination results were compared at the end of a full-length semester and blocked semester. A third course was selected to assess retention at 4 time points. Students were assessed on their cognitive retention using computer-based quizzes and psychomotor retention using in-person skills quizzes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median cognitive performance scores for both courses were slightly better during the blocked semester. There were no significant differences in median psychomotor scores. There was no significant interaction effect between semester structure and retention of cognitive knowledge or psychomotor skills, although there were significant changes in scores over time.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>A blocked semester design may favor immediate cognitive performance. However, there is no significant effect on knowledge or skill retention over a 6-month period. Programs faced with the potential for in-person closures can select either semester structure based on their needs without compromising knowledge or skill retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"37 1","pages":"186-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Blocked Versus Full-Length Semester Design on Doctor of Physical Therapy Student Performance and Retention.\",\"authors\":\"Erin McCallister, Amanda Bernard, Daniel W Flowers, Lauren Rachal Sant\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Restrictions on in-person gatherings during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic required educational programs to explore alternative educational formats. The nature of physical therapy education as a blend of cognitive and psychomotor skill presents additional challenges. During a gradual return to in-person learning, the authors' institution chose to break a full-length 15-week semester into 3, 5-week blocks. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of semester design on course performance. The second aim was to assess the effects of semester design on knowledge and skill retention.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>In undergraduate studies, blocked courses or semesters held over a short period of time may result in equal or better performance compared with courses performed over a longer time. Few studies have been performed on the graduate student population. Most studies have focused on short-term cognitive knowledge acquisition.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Three cohorts of Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students were eligible to participate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two DPT courses (1 first year and 1 second year) were selected to assess cognitive and psychomotor performance. Examination results were compared at the end of a full-length semester and blocked semester. A third course was selected to assess retention at 4 time points. Students were assessed on their cognitive retention using computer-based quizzes and psychomotor retention using in-person skills quizzes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median cognitive performance scores for both courses were slightly better during the blocked semester. There were no significant differences in median psychomotor scores. There was no significant interaction effect between semester structure and retention of cognitive knowledge or psychomotor skills, although there were significant changes in scores over time.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>A blocked semester design may favor immediate cognitive performance. However, there is no significant effect on knowledge or skill retention over a 6-month period. Programs faced with the potential for in-person closures can select either semester structure based on their needs without compromising knowledge or skill retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"186-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文本中提供了补充数字内容。介绍2020年新冠肺炎大流行期间对住院人员聚会的限制要求教育项目探索替代教育形式。物理治疗教育本质上是认知技能和心理运动技能的结合,这带来了额外的挑战。在逐渐恢复面对面学习的过程中,作者所在的机构选择将一个为期15周的完整学期分为3-5周。本研究的第一个目的是评估学期设计对课程表现的影响。第二个目的是评估学期设计对知识和技能保留的影响。文献综述。在本科学习中,与较长时间内完成的课程相比,短期内完成的受阻课程或学期可能会带来同等或更好的成绩。很少对研究生群体进行研究。大多数研究都集中在短期认知知识的获取上。受试者。三组物理治疗博士(DPT)学生有资格参加。方法。选择两个DPT课程(1个第一年和1个第二年)来评估认知和心理运动表现。在完整学期和封闭学期结束时对考试结果进行比较。选择第三个疗程来评估4个时间点的保留率。使用基于计算机的测验评估学生的认知保持能力,并使用面对面技能测验评估心理运动保持能力。后果在封锁的学期里,两门课程的认知成绩中位数都略好。中位心理运动评分没有显著差异。学期结构与认知知识或心理运动技能的保留之间没有显著的交互作用,尽管随着时间的推移,分数会发生显著变化。讨论和结论。受阻的学期设计可能有利于即时的认知表现。然而,在6个月的时间里,对知识或技能的保留没有显著影响。面临可能关闭的项目可以根据自己的需求选择任何一种学期结构,而不会影响知识或技能的保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a Blocked Versus Full-Length Semester Design on Doctor of Physical Therapy Student Performance and Retention.

Introduction: Restrictions on in-person gatherings during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic required educational programs to explore alternative educational formats. The nature of physical therapy education as a blend of cognitive and psychomotor skill presents additional challenges. During a gradual return to in-person learning, the authors' institution chose to break a full-length 15-week semester into 3, 5-week blocks. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of semester design on course performance. The second aim was to assess the effects of semester design on knowledge and skill retention.

Review of literature: In undergraduate studies, blocked courses or semesters held over a short period of time may result in equal or better performance compared with courses performed over a longer time. Few studies have been performed on the graduate student population. Most studies have focused on short-term cognitive knowledge acquisition.

Subjects: Three cohorts of Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students were eligible to participate.

Methods: Two DPT courses (1 first year and 1 second year) were selected to assess cognitive and psychomotor performance. Examination results were compared at the end of a full-length semester and blocked semester. A third course was selected to assess retention at 4 time points. Students were assessed on their cognitive retention using computer-based quizzes and psychomotor retention using in-person skills quizzes.

Results: Median cognitive performance scores for both courses were slightly better during the blocked semester. There were no significant differences in median psychomotor scores. There was no significant interaction effect between semester structure and retention of cognitive knowledge or psychomotor skills, although there were significant changes in scores over time.

Discussion and conclusion: A blocked semester design may favor immediate cognitive performance. However, there is no significant effect on knowledge or skill retention over a 6-month period. Programs faced with the potential for in-person closures can select either semester structure based on their needs without compromising knowledge or skill retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信