Insights into the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension patients in Spain

Introduction and objectives

Accurate risk stratification is pivotal to tailor therapy according to the prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients to positively impact the course of the disease. We conducted a nationwide study to assess how the current European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines for risk assessment and management of PAH patients are followed in real-world practice in Spain.

Methods

Hospital-based physicians answered an online questionnaire describing their yearly caseload of PAH patients and their management of virtual cases scenarios for Word Health Organization functional class (FC) II–III PAH patients.

Results

The main tests requested for a regular risk assessment were echocardiography, 6-minute walk test, measurement of brain natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide plasma levels and right heart catheterization. The main treatment prescribed was an oral double-combination therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) or guanylate cyclase stimulator. Around 20% of the clinicians would also add the selective prostacyclin-receptor agonist (selexipag) to ERA and PDE5i as initial therapy for FC III patients, and nearly all clinicians (99%) would add a prostacyclin pathway agent to FC III PAH patients presenting multiple new intermediate-risk parameters despite a 6-month dual therapy with ERA and PDE5i.

Conclusions

The main decisive factor for the management of PAH patients in Spanish hospitals is their functional class and intermediate-risk parameters. Selexipag was more frequently prescribed than parenteral prostacyclin-analogs in triple-combination therapy for FC II–III PAH patients presenting low-risk and intermediate-risk parameters.