Nicholas A. Gage, Todd Haydon, Ashley S. Macsuga-Gage, Emily M. Flowers, Lyndsie A. Erdy
{"title":"主动监护的循证回顾与元分析","authors":"Nicholas A. Gage, Todd Haydon, Ashley S. Macsuga-Gage, Emily M. Flowers, Lyndsie A. Erdy","doi":"10.1177/0198742919851021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active supervision—defined as circulating, scanning, interacting with students, and reinforcing demonstrations of expected academic and social behaviors by a teacher or other staff member—is often considered a component of safe and secure schools. Yet, the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of active supervision has not been synthesized or evaluated for its quality. Therefore, we conducted an evidence-based review and meta-analysis of empirical research evaluating the effects of active supervision in schools. We identified 12 research studies evaluating active supervision, assessed the quality of each study, and calculated effect sizes for student behaviors, including disruptive behavior. Results from the four studies meeting data requirements for estimating standardized mean difference effect sizes suggest that, on average, active supervision reduced problem behavior by almost 2.0 standard deviation units. Only four studies met the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) design standards and the results of those were mixed, thus not meeting the WWC evidence-based criteria. Limitations and recommendations for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47249,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Disorders","volume":"45 1","pages":"117 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0198742919851021","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evidence-Based Review and Meta-Analysis of Active Supervision\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas A. Gage, Todd Haydon, Ashley S. Macsuga-Gage, Emily M. Flowers, Lyndsie A. Erdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0198742919851021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Active supervision—defined as circulating, scanning, interacting with students, and reinforcing demonstrations of expected academic and social behaviors by a teacher or other staff member—is often considered a component of safe and secure schools. Yet, the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of active supervision has not been synthesized or evaluated for its quality. Therefore, we conducted an evidence-based review and meta-analysis of empirical research evaluating the effects of active supervision in schools. We identified 12 research studies evaluating active supervision, assessed the quality of each study, and calculated effect sizes for student behaviors, including disruptive behavior. Results from the four studies meeting data requirements for estimating standardized mean difference effect sizes suggest that, on average, active supervision reduced problem behavior by almost 2.0 standard deviation units. Only four studies met the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) design standards and the results of those were mixed, thus not meeting the WWC evidence-based criteria. Limitations and recommendations for future research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Disorders\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0198742919851021\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919851021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919851021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
主动监督——定义为循环,扫描,与学生互动,并加强教师或其他工作人员预期的学术和社会行为的示范——通常被认为是安全学校的一个组成部分。然而,支持积极监督有效性的证据基础尚未得到综合,其质量也未得到评价。因此,我们对评估学校主动监督效果的实证研究进行了循证回顾和荟萃分析。我们确定了12项评估主动监督的研究,评估了每项研究的质量,并计算了学生行为(包括破坏性行为)的效应量。四项研究的结果满足估计标准化平均差异效应大小的数据要求,表明主动监督平均减少了近2.0个标准差单位的问题行为。只有四项研究符合What Works Clearinghouse (WWC)的设计标准,这些研究的结果是混合的,因此不符合WWC的循证标准。讨论了今后研究的局限性和建议。
An Evidence-Based Review and Meta-Analysis of Active Supervision
Active supervision—defined as circulating, scanning, interacting with students, and reinforcing demonstrations of expected academic and social behaviors by a teacher or other staff member—is often considered a component of safe and secure schools. Yet, the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of active supervision has not been synthesized or evaluated for its quality. Therefore, we conducted an evidence-based review and meta-analysis of empirical research evaluating the effects of active supervision in schools. We identified 12 research studies evaluating active supervision, assessed the quality of each study, and calculated effect sizes for student behaviors, including disruptive behavior. Results from the four studies meeting data requirements for estimating standardized mean difference effect sizes suggest that, on average, active supervision reduced problem behavior by almost 2.0 standard deviation units. Only four studies met the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) design standards and the results of those were mixed, thus not meeting the WWC evidence-based criteria. Limitations and recommendations for future research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Behavioral Disorders is sent to all members of the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (CCBD), a division of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). All CCBD members must first be members of CEC.