景观研究

Q1 Arts and Humanities
D. Hooke
{"title":"景观研究","authors":"D. Hooke","doi":"10.1080/01433768.2023.2196144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"England. Public awareness and appreciation of wildlife has also increased but ‘Most people probably do not make a connection between human numbers and wildlife declines’ (p. 209) and the greatest cause of problems has not always been faced: ‘most of the activities damaging wildlife in Britain today are strongly influenced by a single primary cause, notably the sheer number of people now living on this small group of crowded islands’ (p. 40). Studies are presented here of other parts of the world — in some parts of the world improving conditions such as female literacy and higher standards of living have lowered birth rates and checked population explosions, backed up by government policies. But this problem is not always recognised in Britain and there are no population policies currently in existence, unlike the situation in some other European countries. The author argues that we have a moral obligation to face facts — our numbers are not self-sustainable, we sequester unfairly ‘large amounts of global resources, inevitably at the expense of poorer, developing nations’ (p. 248). Although efforts have been made to curb immigration we have no policies to encourage people to limit their family size while income review would require a revolution in political will. In the meantime, ‘there has been no let-up in the downward trajectory of wildlife in Britain, leaving the country one of the most nature-depleted in the world’ (p. 254). (The 2019 State of Nature report noted how 41 per cent of the UK wildlife species have declined, with 133 species assessed as having been lost ‘from our shores’ since 1500. Some 26 per cent of mammals risk disappearing altogether, particularly the Wild Cat and Greater Mouse-eared Bat. A recent BBC report claimed that one in seven wildlife species were now facing extinction. The State of Nature report regarded pollution as a major factor — something the author feels is not the whole story’...). A recent Israeli study has confirmed that the ‘mass of humanity is greater than all land mammals left in the wild’ (The Times, 2 March, 2023), reflecting the scale of humanity’s impact. Clearly the author, an Emeritus Professor in the University of Sussex, feels passionate about this subject and fears that not enough people consider seriously the present situation. The book presents his views clearly and concisely with well-researched background studies from across the world. It is well illustrated with some delightful colour photographs. Moreover it is an interesting and compelling read presenting a problem of maximum importance. The conclusion is incontrovertible: ‘even current numbers are not sustainable in the long term’ (p. 179) ... ‘human numbers are already too high for long-term sustainability’ (p. 229).","PeriodicalId":39639,"journal":{"name":"Landscape History","volume":"44 1","pages":"158 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landscape Research\",\"authors\":\"D. Hooke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01433768.2023.2196144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"England. Public awareness and appreciation of wildlife has also increased but ‘Most people probably do not make a connection between human numbers and wildlife declines’ (p. 209) and the greatest cause of problems has not always been faced: ‘most of the activities damaging wildlife in Britain today are strongly influenced by a single primary cause, notably the sheer number of people now living on this small group of crowded islands’ (p. 40). Studies are presented here of other parts of the world — in some parts of the world improving conditions such as female literacy and higher standards of living have lowered birth rates and checked population explosions, backed up by government policies. But this problem is not always recognised in Britain and there are no population policies currently in existence, unlike the situation in some other European countries. The author argues that we have a moral obligation to face facts — our numbers are not self-sustainable, we sequester unfairly ‘large amounts of global resources, inevitably at the expense of poorer, developing nations’ (p. 248). Although efforts have been made to curb immigration we have no policies to encourage people to limit their family size while income review would require a revolution in political will. In the meantime, ‘there has been no let-up in the downward trajectory of wildlife in Britain, leaving the country one of the most nature-depleted in the world’ (p. 254). (The 2019 State of Nature report noted how 41 per cent of the UK wildlife species have declined, with 133 species assessed as having been lost ‘from our shores’ since 1500. Some 26 per cent of mammals risk disappearing altogether, particularly the Wild Cat and Greater Mouse-eared Bat. A recent BBC report claimed that one in seven wildlife species were now facing extinction. The State of Nature report regarded pollution as a major factor — something the author feels is not the whole story’...). A recent Israeli study has confirmed that the ‘mass of humanity is greater than all land mammals left in the wild’ (The Times, 2 March, 2023), reflecting the scale of humanity’s impact. Clearly the author, an Emeritus Professor in the University of Sussex, feels passionate about this subject and fears that not enough people consider seriously the present situation. The book presents his views clearly and concisely with well-researched background studies from across the world. It is well illustrated with some delightful colour photographs. Moreover it is an interesting and compelling read presenting a problem of maximum importance. The conclusion is incontrovertible: ‘even current numbers are not sustainable in the long term’ (p. 179) ... ‘human numbers are already too high for long-term sustainability’ (p. 229).\",\"PeriodicalId\":39639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape History\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"158 - 159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01433768.2023.2196144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01433768.2023.2196144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英格兰公众对野生动物的认识和欣赏也有所提高,但“大多数人可能没有将人类数量和野生动物数量的减少联系起来”(第209页),问题的最大原因并不总是存在:“当今英国大多数破坏野生动物的活动都受到单一主要原因的强烈影响,值得注意的是,现在居住在这一小群拥挤岛屿上的人数之多(第40页)。这里介绍了世界其他地区的研究——在世界一些地区,女性识字率和生活水平的提高等条件的改善降低了出生率,并在政府政策的支持下遏制了人口爆炸。但这个问题在英国并不总是得到承认,目前也没有人口政策,这与其他一些欧洲国家的情况不同。作者认为,我们有道德义务面对事实——我们的数字是不可持续的,我们不公平地封存了“大量全球资源,不可避免地以牺牲较贫穷的发展中国家为代价”(第248页)。尽管我们已经努力遏制移民,但我们没有鼓励人们限制家庭规模的政策,而收入审查需要政治意愿的革命。与此同时,“英国野生动物数量的下降趋势没有减缓,使该国成为世界上自然资源最枯竭的国家之一”(第254页)。(《2019年自然状况报告》指出,41%的英国野生动物物种数量减少,自1500年以来,有133种物种被评估为“从我们的海岸”消失。大约26%的哺乳动物有完全消失的风险,尤其是野猫和大鼠耳蝙蝠。英国广播公司最近的一篇报道称,七分之一的野生动物物种正面临灭绝。《自然状况》报告将污染视为一个主要因素——作者认为这并不是故事的全部…)。以色列最近的一项研究证实,“人类的数量超过了所有野生陆地哺乳动物”(《泰晤士报》,2023年3月2日),反映了人类影响的规模。很明显,作者是苏塞克斯大学的名誉教授,他对这个话题充满热情,并担心没有足够的人认真考虑目前的情况。这本书通过对世界各地的背景研究,清晰简洁地阐述了他的观点。它用一些令人愉快的彩色照片画得很好。此外,这是一本有趣而引人入胜的读物,提出了一个最重要的问题。结论是无可争议的:“即使是目前的数字从长远来看也是不可持续的”(第179页)“人类数量已经太高,无法长期可持续发展”(第229页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Landscape Research
England. Public awareness and appreciation of wildlife has also increased but ‘Most people probably do not make a connection between human numbers and wildlife declines’ (p. 209) and the greatest cause of problems has not always been faced: ‘most of the activities damaging wildlife in Britain today are strongly influenced by a single primary cause, notably the sheer number of people now living on this small group of crowded islands’ (p. 40). Studies are presented here of other parts of the world — in some parts of the world improving conditions such as female literacy and higher standards of living have lowered birth rates and checked population explosions, backed up by government policies. But this problem is not always recognised in Britain and there are no population policies currently in existence, unlike the situation in some other European countries. The author argues that we have a moral obligation to face facts — our numbers are not self-sustainable, we sequester unfairly ‘large amounts of global resources, inevitably at the expense of poorer, developing nations’ (p. 248). Although efforts have been made to curb immigration we have no policies to encourage people to limit their family size while income review would require a revolution in political will. In the meantime, ‘there has been no let-up in the downward trajectory of wildlife in Britain, leaving the country one of the most nature-depleted in the world’ (p. 254). (The 2019 State of Nature report noted how 41 per cent of the UK wildlife species have declined, with 133 species assessed as having been lost ‘from our shores’ since 1500. Some 26 per cent of mammals risk disappearing altogether, particularly the Wild Cat and Greater Mouse-eared Bat. A recent BBC report claimed that one in seven wildlife species were now facing extinction. The State of Nature report regarded pollution as a major factor — something the author feels is not the whole story’...). A recent Israeli study has confirmed that the ‘mass of humanity is greater than all land mammals left in the wild’ (The Times, 2 March, 2023), reflecting the scale of humanity’s impact. Clearly the author, an Emeritus Professor in the University of Sussex, feels passionate about this subject and fears that not enough people consider seriously the present situation. The book presents his views clearly and concisely with well-researched background studies from across the world. It is well illustrated with some delightful colour photographs. Moreover it is an interesting and compelling read presenting a problem of maximum importance. The conclusion is incontrovertible: ‘even current numbers are not sustainable in the long term’ (p. 179) ... ‘human numbers are already too high for long-term sustainability’ (p. 229).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape History
Landscape History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信