作为压力参数的层次水平、优势度和唾液皮质醇水平

Everardo Camacho-Gutiérrez, Claudia Vega-Michel, Juan Ortiz-Valdez, Paola Batiz-Flores
{"title":"作为压力参数的层次水平、优势度和唾液皮质醇水平","authors":"Everardo Camacho-Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Claudia Vega-Michel,&nbsp;Juan Ortiz-Valdez,&nbsp;Paola Batiz-Flores","doi":"10.1016/j.jbhsi.2017.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of the present study was to assess if there are different levels of cortisol in university workers according to their position in the institutional hierarchy. Based on previous studies, which found in primates and humans that subordinate individuals have more cortisol than dominant individuals in stable societies and in a situation without stressors in the environment, we sought to replicate these studies in the context of a university. The participants were 144 employees, 89 men and 55 women, who were executives and leaders, middle managers and operating personnel. Two salivary samples were taken in the afternoon with a 30<!--> <!-->min interval and averaged. The results showed that middle managers have higher levels of cortisol that leaders, but these in turn have more cortisol than the operating staff. Discussed on how the institutional social interactions and the dimension of power in these interactions, regulate the stress levels of individuals working in this context. Comments are concerning to some of the methodological implications for this kind of measures, as well as its practical implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbhsi.2017.06.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nivel jerárquico, dominancia y niveles de cortisol salival como parámetro de estrés\",\"authors\":\"Everardo Camacho-Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Claudia Vega-Michel,&nbsp;Juan Ortiz-Valdez,&nbsp;Paola Batiz-Flores\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbhsi.2017.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of the present study was to assess if there are different levels of cortisol in university workers according to their position in the institutional hierarchy. Based on previous studies, which found in primates and humans that subordinate individuals have more cortisol than dominant individuals in stable societies and in a situation without stressors in the environment, we sought to replicate these studies in the context of a university. The participants were 144 employees, 89 men and 55 women, who were executives and leaders, middle managers and operating personnel. Two salivary samples were taken in the afternoon with a 30<!--> <!-->min interval and averaged. The results showed that middle managers have higher levels of cortisol that leaders, but these in turn have more cortisol than the operating staff. Discussed on how the institutional social interactions and the dimension of power in these interactions, regulate the stress levels of individuals working in this context. Comments are concerning to some of the methodological implications for this kind of measures, as well as its practical implications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 21-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbhsi.2017.06.004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078017300172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078017300172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估是否有不同水平的皮质醇在大学工作人员根据他们在制度层次的地位。先前的研究发现,在稳定的社会和环境中没有压力源的情况下,灵长类动物和人类的从属个体比主导个体拥有更多的皮质醇,基于此,我们试图在大学的背景下复制这些研究。参与者是144名员工,89名男性和55名女性,他们是高管和领导、中层管理人员和运营人员。于下午抽取两次唾液样本,每隔30分钟取平均值。结果显示,中层管理人员的皮质醇水平高于领导者,但反过来,他们的皮质醇水平又高于运营人员。讨论了制度社会互动和这些互动中的权力维度如何调节在这种背景下工作的个人的压力水平。评论涉及这类措施的一些方法影响及其实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nivel jerárquico, dominancia y niveles de cortisol salival como parámetro de estrés

The objective of the present study was to assess if there are different levels of cortisol in university workers according to their position in the institutional hierarchy. Based on previous studies, which found in primates and humans that subordinate individuals have more cortisol than dominant individuals in stable societies and in a situation without stressors in the environment, we sought to replicate these studies in the context of a university. The participants were 144 employees, 89 men and 55 women, who were executives and leaders, middle managers and operating personnel. Two salivary samples were taken in the afternoon with a 30 min interval and averaged. The results showed that middle managers have higher levels of cortisol that leaders, but these in turn have more cortisol than the operating staff. Discussed on how the institutional social interactions and the dimension of power in these interactions, regulate the stress levels of individuals working in this context. Comments are concerning to some of the methodological implications for this kind of measures, as well as its practical implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信