失败的团结:金思良《走向光明》与金塔秀《富士山村》中的帝国结构对抗

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
J. Glade
{"title":"失败的团结:金思良《走向光明》与金塔秀《富士山村》中的帝国结构对抗","authors":"J. Glade","doi":"10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.2.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Published twelve year's apart, Kim Sa-ryang's \"Into the Light\" (1939) and Kim Tal-su's \"Village with a View of Mt. Fuji\" (1951) straddle the August 15, 1945 border that separates Imperial Japan (or colonial Korea) from postwar occupied Japan (or \"liberated\" Korea). Since these two works represent different sides of this chronological binary, it is telling that both represent Japanese society as being stratified based on a social hierarchy of ethnic difference. This article argues that Kim Sa-ryang and Kim Tal-su's efforts to subvert this distinction between the colonizer and the colonized fails because imperial structures, in both Imperial Japan and postwar Japan, prevent solidarity between Koreans and oppressed Japanese groups. The threads of continuity between these two works, therefore, pose a powerful critique of the postwar persistence of these structures and their continued impact on Japan, even while under the occupation of an external power.","PeriodicalId":41529,"journal":{"name":"Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failed Solidarity: Confronting Imperial Structures in Kim Sa-ryang's \\\"Into the Light\\\" and Kim Tal-su's \\\"Village with a View of Mt. Fuji\\\"\",\"authors\":\"J. Glade\",\"doi\":\"10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.2.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Published twelve year's apart, Kim Sa-ryang's \\\"Into the Light\\\" (1939) and Kim Tal-su's \\\"Village with a View of Mt. Fuji\\\" (1951) straddle the August 15, 1945 border that separates Imperial Japan (or colonial Korea) from postwar occupied Japan (or \\\"liberated\\\" Korea). Since these two works represent different sides of this chronological binary, it is telling that both represent Japanese society as being stratified based on a social hierarchy of ethnic difference. This article argues that Kim Sa-ryang and Kim Tal-su's efforts to subvert this distinction between the colonizer and the colonized fails because imperial structures, in both Imperial Japan and postwar Japan, prevent solidarity between Koreans and oppressed Japanese groups. The threads of continuity between these two works, therefore, pose a powerful critique of the postwar persistence of these structures and their continued impact on Japan, even while under the occupation of an external power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.2.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.2.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:金沙良的《走进光明》(1939)和金塔秀的《看富士山的村庄》(1951)相隔12年出版,跨越了1945年8月15日日本帝国(或殖民朝鲜)和战后占领的日本(或“解放”朝鲜)之间的边界。由于这两部作品代表了这种时间二元对立的不同方面,这说明它们都代表了基于种族差异的社会等级制度的日本社会。本文认为,金思良和金塔秀试图颠覆殖民者和被殖民者之间的这种区别的努力失败了,因为日本帝国主义和战后日本的帝国结构都阻止了朝鲜人和被压迫的日本群体之间的团结。因此,这两部作品之间的连续性线索,对这些结构的战后持久性及其对日本的持续影响提出了强有力的批评,即使在外部势力占领下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Failed Solidarity: Confronting Imperial Structures in Kim Sa-ryang's "Into the Light" and Kim Tal-su's "Village with a View of Mt. Fuji"
ABSTRACT:Published twelve year's apart, Kim Sa-ryang's "Into the Light" (1939) and Kim Tal-su's "Village with a View of Mt. Fuji" (1951) straddle the August 15, 1945 border that separates Imperial Japan (or colonial Korea) from postwar occupied Japan (or "liberated" Korea). Since these two works represent different sides of this chronological binary, it is telling that both represent Japanese society as being stratified based on a social hierarchy of ethnic difference. This article argues that Kim Sa-ryang and Kim Tal-su's efforts to subvert this distinction between the colonizer and the colonized fails because imperial structures, in both Imperial Japan and postwar Japan, prevent solidarity between Koreans and oppressed Japanese groups. The threads of continuity between these two works, therefore, pose a powerful critique of the postwar persistence of these structures and their continued impact on Japan, even while under the occupation of an external power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信