Jessica E.S. Gonçalves, C. V. Andrade, F. Russomano, G. Nuovo, S. M. Amaro-Filho, Maria Oo Carvalho, A. Nicol
{"title":"p16作为宫颈肿瘤生物标志物的作用:一个有争议的问题?","authors":"Jessica E.S. Gonçalves, C. V. Andrade, F. Russomano, G. Nuovo, S. M. Amaro-Filho, Maria Oo Carvalho, A. Nicol","doi":"10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2017.06.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Protein p16 has been extensively studied as a potential biomarker for precursor lesions to \ndistinguish cervical Intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) from their mimics. However, the use of p16 as prognostic \nbiomarker for diagnosis of cervical cancer and precancer is controversial. This study focuses on the assessment of \npeer-reviewed scientific data related to the use of p16 to predict disease severity and its controversies. \nMETHODS: We reviewed publications in MEDLINE/PubMed assessing the clinical, diagnostic and prognostic \nsignificance of p16 in CIN and cervical cancer; we included publications from 2009 to June 2017. \nRESULTS: The use of p16 as a prognostic marker is still unreliable, although it could be a useful tool for diagnosis of \nCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia lesions with undetermined morphology. Moreover, p16 appears to be a specific \nmarker of high-risk oncogenic HPV infection. \nCONCLUSION: This review shows the potential utility and drawbacks of p16 for clinical practice and the diagnosis \nof cervical cancer. Further studies are required to substantiate the role of p16 in conjunction with other more \nsensitive and specific biomarkers for diagnosing CIN and predicting its progression.","PeriodicalId":31471,"journal":{"name":"Medical Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of p16 as putative biomarker for cervical neoplasia: A controversial issue?\",\"authors\":\"Jessica E.S. Gonçalves, C. V. Andrade, F. Russomano, G. Nuovo, S. M. Amaro-Filho, Maria Oo Carvalho, A. Nicol\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2017.06.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Protein p16 has been extensively studied as a potential biomarker for precursor lesions to \\ndistinguish cervical Intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) from their mimics. However, the use of p16 as prognostic \\nbiomarker for diagnosis of cervical cancer and precancer is controversial. This study focuses on the assessment of \\npeer-reviewed scientific data related to the use of p16 to predict disease severity and its controversies. \\nMETHODS: We reviewed publications in MEDLINE/PubMed assessing the clinical, diagnostic and prognostic \\nsignificance of p16 in CIN and cervical cancer; we included publications from 2009 to June 2017. \\nRESULTS: The use of p16 as a prognostic marker is still unreliable, although it could be a useful tool for diagnosis of \\nCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia lesions with undetermined morphology. Moreover, p16 appears to be a specific \\nmarker of high-risk oncogenic HPV infection. \\nCONCLUSION: This review shows the potential utility and drawbacks of p16 for clinical practice and the diagnosis \\nof cervical cancer. Further studies are required to substantiate the role of p16 in conjunction with other more \\nsensitive and specific biomarkers for diagnosing CIN and predicting its progression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Express\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2017.06.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2017.06.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of p16 as putative biomarker for cervical neoplasia: A controversial issue?
INTRODUCTION: Protein p16 has been extensively studied as a potential biomarker for precursor lesions to
distinguish cervical Intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) from their mimics. However, the use of p16 as prognostic
biomarker for diagnosis of cervical cancer and precancer is controversial. This study focuses on the assessment of
peer-reviewed scientific data related to the use of p16 to predict disease severity and its controversies.
METHODS: We reviewed publications in MEDLINE/PubMed assessing the clinical, diagnostic and prognostic
significance of p16 in CIN and cervical cancer; we included publications from 2009 to June 2017.
RESULTS: The use of p16 as a prognostic marker is still unreliable, although it could be a useful tool for diagnosis of
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia lesions with undetermined morphology. Moreover, p16 appears to be a specific
marker of high-risk oncogenic HPV infection.
CONCLUSION: This review shows the potential utility and drawbacks of p16 for clinical practice and the diagnosis
of cervical cancer. Further studies are required to substantiate the role of p16 in conjunction with other more
sensitive and specific biomarkers for diagnosing CIN and predicting its progression.