制度化的同理心

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hannah Read
{"title":"制度化的同理心","authors":"Hannah Read","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2021.1974364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Questions about the social and moral importance of empathy have garnered much debate in recent years. On the one hand, critics of empathy have pointed out its susceptibility to morally troubling biases and group preferences. On the other hand, proponents of empathy maintain that empathy is a motivated response that can be trained and developed to avoid these so-called empathic failures. Yet, both sides focus on the individual psychological factors that contribute to empathy’s success or failure in a range of cases, thereby overlooking the importance of social contexts and institutions in facilitating or inhibiting empathy. The aim of this paper is thus to offer an account of the role that institutionally structured social contexts can and should play in promoting empathy across group divides and helping to overcome empathy’s morally troubling tendency to fail in cases where outgroup members are concerned.","PeriodicalId":47410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"224 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutionalized empathy\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Read\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03057240.2021.1974364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Questions about the social and moral importance of empathy have garnered much debate in recent years. On the one hand, critics of empathy have pointed out its susceptibility to morally troubling biases and group preferences. On the other hand, proponents of empathy maintain that empathy is a motivated response that can be trained and developed to avoid these so-called empathic failures. Yet, both sides focus on the individual psychological factors that contribute to empathy’s success or failure in a range of cases, thereby overlooking the importance of social contexts and institutions in facilitating or inhibiting empathy. The aim of this paper is thus to offer an account of the role that institutionally structured social contexts can and should play in promoting empathy across group divides and helping to overcome empathy’s morally troubling tendency to fail in cases where outgroup members are concerned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Moral Education\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"224 - 243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Moral Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2021.1974364\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moral Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2021.1974364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,关于移情的社会和道德重要性的问题引起了很多争论。一方面,共情的批评者指出,共情容易受到道德上令人不安的偏见和群体偏好的影响。另一方面,移情的支持者坚持认为,移情是一种有动机的反应,可以通过训练和发展来避免这些所谓的移情失败。然而,在一系列案例中,双方都关注导致移情成功或失败的个人心理因素,从而忽视了社会环境和制度在促进或抑制移情方面的重要性。因此,本文的目的是说明制度结构的社会环境在促进跨群体的同理心方面可以也应该发挥的作用,并帮助克服在涉及群体外成员的情况下,同理心在道德上令人不安的失败倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutionalized empathy
ABSTRACT Questions about the social and moral importance of empathy have garnered much debate in recent years. On the one hand, critics of empathy have pointed out its susceptibility to morally troubling biases and group preferences. On the other hand, proponents of empathy maintain that empathy is a motivated response that can be trained and developed to avoid these so-called empathic failures. Yet, both sides focus on the individual psychological factors that contribute to empathy’s success or failure in a range of cases, thereby overlooking the importance of social contexts and institutions in facilitating or inhibiting empathy. The aim of this paper is thus to offer an account of the role that institutionally structured social contexts can and should play in promoting empathy across group divides and helping to overcome empathy’s morally troubling tendency to fail in cases where outgroup members are concerned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Moral Education
Journal of Moral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Moral Education (a Charitable Company Limited by Guarantee) provides a unique interdisciplinary forum for consideration of all aspects of moral education and development across the lifespan. It contains philosophical analyses, reports of empirical research and evaluation of educational strategies which address a range of value issues and the process of valuing, in theory and practice, and also at the social and individual level. The journal regularly includes country based state-of-the-art papers on moral education and publishes special issues on particular topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信