肿瘤反应与肿瘤患者EQ5D-3L生活质量变化的关系

Stephen Joseph Garcia, C. V. Uy, C. Ngelangel, Francisco delos Reyes
{"title":"肿瘤反应与肿瘤患者EQ5D-3L生活质量变化的关系","authors":"Stephen Joseph Garcia, C. V. Uy, C. Ngelangel, Francisco delos Reyes","doi":"10.21767/2254-6081.1000142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The primary aim in cancer treatment is to provide excellent tumor response while maintaining the most acceptable quality of life. The relationship of QoL to tumor response has not yet been well discussed. This study determines the association between the change in the QoL from baseline to one year follow-up and tumor response among patients enrolled in the ASEAN Cost in Oncology (ACTION) study. \nMethods: Pooled data from the ACTION study was reviewed. Associations between demographics, cancer type, and tumor response were analyzed. \nResults: Of the qualified profiles (412/ 742), breast cancer (42.2%), colorectal (21.8%), and head neck (10%) are still most common. Of these cases, 126 (30.6%) were metastatic on presentation. Demographic data showed female sex having better tumor response. More importantly, tumor response was significantly associated with improvement in QoL: complete or partial response was associated with improvement in QoL (p=.000) while progressive disease related to worse situations. The general pattern seen above was reflected in female breast cancer cases, colon and rectal cancer, and other malignant neoplasms. \nConclusion: Improvement in QoL was significantly associated with better tumor response. This trend was similar for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and other malignancies. The use of universal measures of health like the EQ5D-3L may be used to quantify improvements in QoL with several limitations: 1) Cultural differences should be established and 2) Limitations in quantifying precise changes in QoL. The utilization of more culturally adept QoL measures may address this problem. Similarly, the use of secondary data may limit the results in this study. Prospective studies specifically addressing the objectives may improve results.","PeriodicalId":91204,"journal":{"name":"Archives in cancer research","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21767/2254-6081.1000142","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between Tumor Response and Change in EQ5D-3L Quality of Life among Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Joseph Garcia, C. V. Uy, C. Ngelangel, Francisco delos Reyes\",\"doi\":\"10.21767/2254-6081.1000142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The primary aim in cancer treatment is to provide excellent tumor response while maintaining the most acceptable quality of life. The relationship of QoL to tumor response has not yet been well discussed. This study determines the association between the change in the QoL from baseline to one year follow-up and tumor response among patients enrolled in the ASEAN Cost in Oncology (ACTION) study. \\nMethods: Pooled data from the ACTION study was reviewed. Associations between demographics, cancer type, and tumor response were analyzed. \\nResults: Of the qualified profiles (412/ 742), breast cancer (42.2%), colorectal (21.8%), and head neck (10%) are still most common. Of these cases, 126 (30.6%) were metastatic on presentation. Demographic data showed female sex having better tumor response. More importantly, tumor response was significantly associated with improvement in QoL: complete or partial response was associated with improvement in QoL (p=.000) while progressive disease related to worse situations. The general pattern seen above was reflected in female breast cancer cases, colon and rectal cancer, and other malignant neoplasms. \\nConclusion: Improvement in QoL was significantly associated with better tumor response. This trend was similar for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and other malignancies. The use of universal measures of health like the EQ5D-3L may be used to quantify improvements in QoL with several limitations: 1) Cultural differences should be established and 2) Limitations in quantifying precise changes in QoL. The utilization of more culturally adept QoL measures may address this problem. Similarly, the use of secondary data may limit the results in this study. Prospective studies specifically addressing the objectives may improve results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives in cancer research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21767/2254-6081.1000142\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives in cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21767/2254-6081.1000142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives in cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/2254-6081.1000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:癌症治疗的主要目的是提供良好的肿瘤反应,同时保持最可接受的生活质量。生活质量与肿瘤反应的关系尚未得到很好的讨论。本研究确定了东盟肿瘤成本(ACTION)研究中患者从基线到一年随访的生活质量变化与肿瘤反应之间的关系。方法:回顾ACTION研究的汇总数据。分析了人口统计学、癌症类型和肿瘤反应之间的关系。结果:在合格病例(412/742)中,癌症(42.2%)、结直肠癌(21.8%)和头颈部(10%)仍然是最常见的。在这些病例中,126例(30.6%)在表现时转移。人口统计学数据显示女性肿瘤反应较好。更重要的是,肿瘤反应与生活质量改善显著相关:完全或部分反应与生活水平改善相关(p=0.000),而进展性疾病与更糟糕的情况相关。上述总体模式反映在女性乳腺癌癌症、结肠癌和直肠癌癌症以及其他恶性肿瘤中。结论:生活质量的改善与肿瘤反应的改善显著相关。这一趋势与癌症、癌症和其他恶性肿瘤相似。使用EQ5D-3L等通用健康指标可用于量化生活质量的改善,但有几个局限性:1)应确定文化差异,2)量化生活质量精确变化的局限性。使用更符合文化的生活质量措施可以解决这个问题。同样,二次数据的使用可能会限制本研究的结果。专门针对这些目标的前瞻性研究可能会改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between Tumor Response and Change in EQ5D-3L Quality of Life among Cancer Patients
Introduction: The primary aim in cancer treatment is to provide excellent tumor response while maintaining the most acceptable quality of life. The relationship of QoL to tumor response has not yet been well discussed. This study determines the association between the change in the QoL from baseline to one year follow-up and tumor response among patients enrolled in the ASEAN Cost in Oncology (ACTION) study. Methods: Pooled data from the ACTION study was reviewed. Associations between demographics, cancer type, and tumor response were analyzed. Results: Of the qualified profiles (412/ 742), breast cancer (42.2%), colorectal (21.8%), and head neck (10%) are still most common. Of these cases, 126 (30.6%) were metastatic on presentation. Demographic data showed female sex having better tumor response. More importantly, tumor response was significantly associated with improvement in QoL: complete or partial response was associated with improvement in QoL (p=.000) while progressive disease related to worse situations. The general pattern seen above was reflected in female breast cancer cases, colon and rectal cancer, and other malignant neoplasms. Conclusion: Improvement in QoL was significantly associated with better tumor response. This trend was similar for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and other malignancies. The use of universal measures of health like the EQ5D-3L may be used to quantify improvements in QoL with several limitations: 1) Cultural differences should be established and 2) Limitations in quantifying precise changes in QoL. The utilization of more culturally adept QoL measures may address this problem. Similarly, the use of secondary data may limit the results in this study. Prospective studies specifically addressing the objectives may improve results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信