垂直载荷和速度对牙刷刚度测量的影响

Ashley N. Bowers MS , Christina M. Tyrakowski PhD , Jamie Spomer PhD , Prerna Gopal BDS, PhD
{"title":"垂直载荷和速度对牙刷刚度测量的影响","authors":"Ashley N. Bowers MS ,&nbsp;Christina M. Tyrakowski PhD ,&nbsp;Jamie Spomer PhD ,&nbsp;Prerna Gopal BDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jfscie.2023.100023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dental abrasion can be caused by aggressive brushing or using a toothbrush with stiff bristles. Because this damage to the oral cavity is irreversible, prevention is ideal. The international standards for testing toothbrushes for safety and efficacy are International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 22254, ISO 20126, and ISO 20127. American National Standards (ANSI)/American Dental Association (ADA) 119 is an adoption of ISO 22254 and ISO 20126 for manual toothbrushes, and ANSI/ADA 120 is an adoption of ISO 20127 for powered toothbrushes. ISO 22254 contains a test method for the resistance of the tufted portion to deflection, from which toothbrush stiffness is calculated. Key variables of this test method, such as changing the vertical load (VL) applied to the tufted portion of the brush head during testing and changing the velocity of the brushing table of the toothbrush stiffness test machine, were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-eight different manual (n = 5) and powered (n = 23) toothbrushes were tested with modification according to the resistance to deflection method in ANSI/ADA 119. The means of the stiffness values at each VL or brushing table velocity for each toothbrush were compared using 2-sample <em>t</em> tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most of the toothbrush stiffness values were statistically significantly different at different VLs. However, most toothbrush stiffness values exhibited no statistical differences between the 2 velocities tested.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most modern toothbrushes cannot withstand the VL required in the ANSI/ADA standard. The VL used for testing significantly affects stiffness measurements, whereas the velocity of the brushing table during testing did not significantly affect the stiffness values obtained.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73530,"journal":{"name":"JADA foundational science","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of vertical load and speed on toothbrush stiffness measurements\",\"authors\":\"Ashley N. Bowers MS ,&nbsp;Christina M. Tyrakowski PhD ,&nbsp;Jamie Spomer PhD ,&nbsp;Prerna Gopal BDS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfscie.2023.100023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dental abrasion can be caused by aggressive brushing or using a toothbrush with stiff bristles. Because this damage to the oral cavity is irreversible, prevention is ideal. The international standards for testing toothbrushes for safety and efficacy are International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 22254, ISO 20126, and ISO 20127. American National Standards (ANSI)/American Dental Association (ADA) 119 is an adoption of ISO 22254 and ISO 20126 for manual toothbrushes, and ANSI/ADA 120 is an adoption of ISO 20127 for powered toothbrushes. ISO 22254 contains a test method for the resistance of the tufted portion to deflection, from which toothbrush stiffness is calculated. Key variables of this test method, such as changing the vertical load (VL) applied to the tufted portion of the brush head during testing and changing the velocity of the brushing table of the toothbrush stiffness test machine, were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-eight different manual (n = 5) and powered (n = 23) toothbrushes were tested with modification according to the resistance to deflection method in ANSI/ADA 119. The means of the stiffness values at each VL or brushing table velocity for each toothbrush were compared using 2-sample <em>t</em> tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most of the toothbrush stiffness values were statistically significantly different at different VLs. However, most toothbrush stiffness values exhibited no statistical differences between the 2 velocities tested.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most modern toothbrushes cannot withstand the VL required in the ANSI/ADA standard. The VL used for testing significantly affects stiffness measurements, whereas the velocity of the brushing table during testing did not significantly affect the stiffness values obtained.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JADA foundational science\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JADA foundational science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X23000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JADA foundational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X23000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙齿磨损可能是由于用力刷牙或使用硬毛牙刷造成的。因为这种对口腔的损害是不可逆的,所以预防是理想的。测试牙刷安全性和有效性的国际标准是国际标准化组织(ISO) 22254、ISO 20126和ISO 20127。美国国家标准(ANSI)/美国牙科协会(ADA) 119是手动牙刷的ISO 22254和ISO 20126的采用,ANSI/ADA 120是电动牙刷的ISO 20127的采用。ISO 22254包含了簇状部分抗挠曲的测试方法,由此计算牙刷的刚度。对试验过程中改变刷头簇状部分的垂直载荷(VL)、改变牙刷刚度试验机刷台的速度等试验方法的关键变量进行了考察。方法对28支不同型号的手动牙刷(n = 5)和电动牙刷(n = 23)按照ANSI/ADA 119的抗挠度法进行修改测试。采用双样本t检验比较每种牙刷在每个VL或刷表速度下的刚度值均值。结果在不同VLs下,大多数牙刷刚度值有统计学差异。然而,大多数牙刷刚度值在两种测试速度之间没有统计学差异。大多数现代牙刷无法承受ANSI/ADA标准所要求的VL。用于测试的VL显著影响刚度测量,而测试过程中刷台的速度对获得的刚度值没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of vertical load and speed on toothbrush stiffness measurements

Effect of vertical load and speed on toothbrush stiffness measurements

Background

Dental abrasion can be caused by aggressive brushing or using a toothbrush with stiff bristles. Because this damage to the oral cavity is irreversible, prevention is ideal. The international standards for testing toothbrushes for safety and efficacy are International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 22254, ISO 20126, and ISO 20127. American National Standards (ANSI)/American Dental Association (ADA) 119 is an adoption of ISO 22254 and ISO 20126 for manual toothbrushes, and ANSI/ADA 120 is an adoption of ISO 20127 for powered toothbrushes. ISO 22254 contains a test method for the resistance of the tufted portion to deflection, from which toothbrush stiffness is calculated. Key variables of this test method, such as changing the vertical load (VL) applied to the tufted portion of the brush head during testing and changing the velocity of the brushing table of the toothbrush stiffness test machine, were examined.

Methods

Twenty-eight different manual (n = 5) and powered (n = 23) toothbrushes were tested with modification according to the resistance to deflection method in ANSI/ADA 119. The means of the stiffness values at each VL or brushing table velocity for each toothbrush were compared using 2-sample t tests.

Results

Most of the toothbrush stiffness values were statistically significantly different at different VLs. However, most toothbrush stiffness values exhibited no statistical differences between the 2 velocities tested.

Conclusions

Most modern toothbrushes cannot withstand the VL required in the ANSI/ADA standard. The VL used for testing significantly affects stiffness measurements, whereas the velocity of the brushing table during testing did not significantly affect the stiffness values obtained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JADA foundational science
JADA foundational science Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信