评估社交媒体影响者的定性方法:基于案例的文献综述

Q3 Computer Science
Kangmin Cho, Kichang Jung, Michele Lee, Yena Lee, Jaewon Park, Neal Dreamson
{"title":"评估社交媒体影响者的定性方法:基于案例的文献综述","authors":"Kangmin Cho, Kichang Jung, Michele Lee, Yena Lee, Jaewon Park, Neal Dreamson","doi":"10.7903/ijecs.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the age of the Internet upon us, many marketing strategies have come to focus on social media influencers. Current research about social media influencers conveys the quantitative values of influencers’ capacity, but the numbers are readily manipulated with automated bots and other methods. Therefore, in this case-based literature review, we aim to demonstrate the legitimacy to evaluate influencers’ performance from qualitative perspectives. We found ten qualitative factors, such as credibility, appearance, connectedness, and so on, from a review of relevant 37 journal articles identified from keywords searching on academic databases. Then, we redefined and remapped the factors by thematically reviewing 39 promotion video clips from 13 popular social media influencers in lifestyle, which results in 52 indicators. We semantically and systematically classified the indicators with three larger qualitative themes and nine sub-themes: (a) credibility: expertise, trustworthiness, and quality content, (b) engagement: interpersonal interaction, quality presentation, and personal branding; (c) connectivity : participatory activities, collaborating with others, and socially networking. For qualitative approaches to social media influencers, we articulated applicable analysis methods to each sub-theme. In this study, we demonstrated the potential of an alternative to existing quantitative evaluation methods that marketers could consider it in their recruitment and evaluation of social media influencers to find the right social media influencers.","PeriodicalId":38305,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative Approaches to Evaluating Social Media Influencers: A Case-Based Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Kangmin Cho, Kichang Jung, Michele Lee, Yena Lee, Jaewon Park, Neal Dreamson\",\"doi\":\"10.7903/ijecs.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the age of the Internet upon us, many marketing strategies have come to focus on social media influencers. Current research about social media influencers conveys the quantitative values of influencers’ capacity, but the numbers are readily manipulated with automated bots and other methods. Therefore, in this case-based literature review, we aim to demonstrate the legitimacy to evaluate influencers’ performance from qualitative perspectives. We found ten qualitative factors, such as credibility, appearance, connectedness, and so on, from a review of relevant 37 journal articles identified from keywords searching on academic databases. Then, we redefined and remapped the factors by thematically reviewing 39 promotion video clips from 13 popular social media influencers in lifestyle, which results in 52 indicators. We semantically and systematically classified the indicators with three larger qualitative themes and nine sub-themes: (a) credibility: expertise, trustworthiness, and quality content, (b) engagement: interpersonal interaction, quality presentation, and personal branding; (c) connectivity : participatory activities, collaborating with others, and socially networking. For qualitative approaches to social media influencers, we articulated applicable analysis methods to each sub-theme. In this study, we demonstrated the potential of an alternative to existing quantitative evaluation methods that marketers could consider it in their recruitment and evaluation of social media influencers to find the right social media influencers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7903/ijecs.2025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7903/ijecs.2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着互联网时代的到来,许多营销策略都集中在社交媒体影响者身上。目前关于社交媒体影响者的研究传达了影响者能力的定量值,但这些数字很容易被自动机器人和其他方法操纵。因此,在这篇基于案例的文献综述中,我们旨在从定性的角度证明评估影响者表现的合法性。我们通过对学术数据库中关键词搜索确定的37篇相关期刊文章的综述,发现了可信度、外表、连通性等十个定性因素。然后,我们重新定义并重新映射了这些因素,从主题上回顾了来自13位生活方式中受欢迎的社交媒体影响者的39个宣传视频片段,得到了52个指标。我们从语义上系统地将指标分为三个较大的定性主题和九个子主题:(a)可信度:专业知识、可信度和质量内容,(b)参与度:人际互动、质量展示和个人品牌;(c) 连通性:参与性活动、与他人合作以及社交网络。对于社交媒体影响者的定性方法,我们对每个子主题阐述了适用的分析方法。在这项研究中,我们展示了一种替代现有定量评估方法的潜力,营销人员可以在招聘和评估社交媒体影响者时考虑这种方法,以找到合适的社交媒体影响人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative Approaches to Evaluating Social Media Influencers: A Case-Based Literature Review
With the age of the Internet upon us, many marketing strategies have come to focus on social media influencers. Current research about social media influencers conveys the quantitative values of influencers’ capacity, but the numbers are readily manipulated with automated bots and other methods. Therefore, in this case-based literature review, we aim to demonstrate the legitimacy to evaluate influencers’ performance from qualitative perspectives. We found ten qualitative factors, such as credibility, appearance, connectedness, and so on, from a review of relevant 37 journal articles identified from keywords searching on academic databases. Then, we redefined and remapped the factors by thematically reviewing 39 promotion video clips from 13 popular social media influencers in lifestyle, which results in 52 indicators. We semantically and systematically classified the indicators with three larger qualitative themes and nine sub-themes: (a) credibility: expertise, trustworthiness, and quality content, (b) engagement: interpersonal interaction, quality presentation, and personal branding; (c) connectivity : participatory activities, collaborating with others, and socially networking. For qualitative approaches to social media influencers, we articulated applicable analysis methods to each sub-theme. In this study, we demonstrated the potential of an alternative to existing quantitative evaluation methods that marketers could consider it in their recruitment and evaluation of social media influencers to find the right social media influencers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies
International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IJECS is a double-blind referred academic journal for all fields of Electronic Commerce. To serve as an international platform, the IJECS encourages manuscript submissions from authors all around the world. As a multi-discipline journal, The IJECS welcome both technology oriented and business oriented electronic commerce research articles. The purpose of the International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies is to promote electronic commerce research and provide worldwide scholars a place to publish their innovative work in electronic commerce. To be published in the journal, the manuscript must make strong empirical, theoretical, or practical contributions and highlight the significance of the contributions to the electronic commerce field. Thus, preference is given to submissions that test, extend, or build strong theoretical frameworks for electronic commerce theory, electronic commerce system development, and electronic commerce practice. The journal is not tied to any particular national context; the geographic distribution of authors publishing in the journal came from countries around the world. Articles introducing cases of innovative applications in electronic commerce around the world are also published in the journal. The journal provides scholars opportunities to realize the electronic commerce research and development around the world. Articles in the International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies will include, but are not limited to the following areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信