SureTectTM与表型和基因型方法检测即食食品中沙门氏菌和单核细胞增多性李斯特菌的比较

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Kye-Hwan Byun, Byoung-Hu Kim, Ah Jin Cho, Eun Her, Sun-Kyung Yoon, Taeik Kim, S. Ha
{"title":"SureTectTM与表型和基因型方法检测即食食品中沙门氏菌和单核细胞增多性李斯特菌的比较","authors":"Kye-Hwan Byun, Byoung-Hu Kim, Ah Jin Cho, Eun Her, Sun-Kyung Yoon, Taeik Kim, S. Ha","doi":"10.11002/kjfp.2022.30.2.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe objective of this study is to compare and assess the effectiveness of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and the selective agar plate method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods. In RTE foods, the detection performance of the three methods (RT-PCR [SureTectTM kit and PowerChekTM kit], LAMP [3M MDS], selective agar) were similar at 0-10, 10-50, 50-100, and 100- CFU/mL of Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes. We found that with RT-PCR, the Ct value of salad was significantly higher (p<0.05) than other RTE foods, indicating that fiber plays a critical role as an obstacle to the rapid detection of Salmonella spp. However, the Ct value displayed a mixed pattern according to the inoculation level of L. monocytogenes. The use of rapid detection kits and machines mostly depends on the user’s choice, with accuracy, ease of use, and economy being the primary considerations. As an RT-PCR kit, SureTectTM and PowerChekTM showed high accuracy in detecting Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in RTE foods, showing that they can replace the existing RT-PCR kits available. Additionally, LAMP also showed excellent detection performance, suggesting that it has the potential to be used as a food safety management tool.\n","PeriodicalId":17875,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of SureTectTM with phenotypic and genotypic method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods\",\"authors\":\"Kye-Hwan Byun, Byoung-Hu Kim, Ah Jin Cho, Eun Her, Sun-Kyung Yoon, Taeik Kim, S. Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.11002/kjfp.2022.30.2.262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThe objective of this study is to compare and assess the effectiveness of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and the selective agar plate method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods. In RTE foods, the detection performance of the three methods (RT-PCR [SureTectTM kit and PowerChekTM kit], LAMP [3M MDS], selective agar) were similar at 0-10, 10-50, 50-100, and 100- CFU/mL of Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes. We found that with RT-PCR, the Ct value of salad was significantly higher (p<0.05) than other RTE foods, indicating that fiber plays a critical role as an obstacle to the rapid detection of Salmonella spp. However, the Ct value displayed a mixed pattern according to the inoculation level of L. monocytogenes. The use of rapid detection kits and machines mostly depends on the user’s choice, with accuracy, ease of use, and economy being the primary considerations. As an RT-PCR kit, SureTectTM and PowerChekTM showed high accuracy in detecting Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in RTE foods, showing that they can replace the existing RT-PCR kits available. Additionally, LAMP also showed excellent detection performance, suggesting that it has the potential to be used as a food safety management tool.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":17875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Food Preservation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Food Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2022.30.2.262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2022.30.2.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较和评估实时聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)、环介导等温扩增(LAMP)和选择性琼脂平板法检测即食食品中沙门氏菌和单核细胞增多性李斯特菌的有效性。在RTE食品中,三种方法(RT-PCR[SureTectTM试剂盒和PowerChekTM试剂盒]、LAMP[3M MDS]、选择性琼脂)对沙门氏菌属和单核细胞增多性李斯特菌的检测性能在0-10、10-50、50-100和100-CFU/mL时相似。我们发现,通过RT-PCR,沙拉的Ct值显著高于其他RTE食品(p<0.05),表明纤维在沙门氏菌的快速检测中起着关键作用。然而,根据单核细胞增多性李斯特菌的接种水平,Ct值显示出混合模式。快速检测试剂盒和机器的使用主要取决于用户的选择,准确性、易用性和经济性是首要考虑因素。作为RT-PCR试剂盒,SureTectTM和PowerChekTM在检测RTE食品中的沙门氏菌和单核细胞增多性李斯特菌方面显示出很高的准确性,表明它们可以取代现有的RT-PCR试剂盒。此外,LAMP还显示出优异的检测性能,这表明它有潜力用作食品安全管理工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of SureTectTM with phenotypic and genotypic method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods
The objective of this study is to compare and assess the effectiveness of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and the selective agar plate method for the detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods. In RTE foods, the detection performance of the three methods (RT-PCR [SureTectTM kit and PowerChekTM kit], LAMP [3M MDS], selective agar) were similar at 0-10, 10-50, 50-100, and 100- CFU/mL of Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes. We found that with RT-PCR, the Ct value of salad was significantly higher (p<0.05) than other RTE foods, indicating that fiber plays a critical role as an obstacle to the rapid detection of Salmonella spp. However, the Ct value displayed a mixed pattern according to the inoculation level of L. monocytogenes. The use of rapid detection kits and machines mostly depends on the user’s choice, with accuracy, ease of use, and economy being the primary considerations. As an RT-PCR kit, SureTectTM and PowerChekTM showed high accuracy in detecting Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in RTE foods, showing that they can replace the existing RT-PCR kits available. Additionally, LAMP also showed excellent detection performance, suggesting that it has the potential to be used as a food safety management tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Food Preservation
Korean Journal of Food Preservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote and encourage the advancement of quantitative improvement for the storage, processing and distribution of food and its related disciplines, theory and research on its application. Topics covered include: Food Preservation and Packaging Food and Food Material distribution Fresh-cut Food Manufacturing Food processing Technology Food Functional Properties Food Quality / Safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信