两只杂交猪盲肠菌群组成的三向杂交模型比较

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学
Yuting Yang, Liyan Shen, Huan Gao, Jinming Ran, Xian Li, Hengxin Jiang, Xueyan Li, Zhenhui Cao, Ying Huang, Sumei Zhao, Chunlian Song, H. Pan
{"title":"两只杂交猪盲肠菌群组成的三向杂交模型比较","authors":"Yuting Yang, Liyan Shen, Huan Gao, Jinming Ran, Xian Li, Hengxin Jiang, Xueyan Li, Zhenhui Cao, Ying Huang, Sumei Zhao, Chunlian Song, H. Pan","doi":"10.5713/ajas.20.0681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"30 Objectives: The intestinal microbiota plays an important role in host physiology, metabolism, 31 immunity, and behavior. And host genetics could influence the gut microbiota of hybrid 32 animals. The three-way cross model is commonly utilized in commercial pig production; 33 however, the effects of this model on the gut microbial composition are rarely reported. 34 Methods: Two three-way hybrid pigs were selected, with Saba pigs as the starting maternal 35 pig: Duroc × (Berkshire × Saba) (DBS) pig, Berkshire × (Duroc × Saba) (BDS) pig. One 36 hundred pigs of each model were reared from 35 days (d) to 210 d. The body weight or feed 37 consumption of all pigs were recorded and their feed/gain (F/G) ratio was calculated. On day 38 210, 10 pigs were selected for slaughter, and cecal chyme samples were collected for 16S 39 rRNA gene sequencing. 40 Results: The final body weight (FBW) and average daily gain (ADG) of DBS pigs were 41 significantly higher than those of BDS pigs (p<0.05), while the F/G ratios of DBS pigs were 42 significantly lower than those of BDS pigs (p<0.05). The dominant phyla in DBS and BDS 43 pigs were Bacteroidetes (55.23% vs 59%, respectively) and Firmicutes (36.65% vs 34.86%, 44 respectively) (p>0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Prevotella, Roseburia, and 45 Anaerovibrio in DBS pigs was significantly lower than in BDS pigs (p<0.01). The abundance 46 of Eubacterium, Clostridium XI, Bacteroides, Methanomassiliicoccus, and Parabacteroides in 47 DBS pigs was significantly higher than in BDS pigs (p<0.05). The FBWs and ADGs were 48 positively correlated with Bacteroides, ClostridiumXI, and Parabacteroides but negatively 49 correlated with the Prevotella, Prevotella/Bacteroides (P/B) ratio, Roseburia, and 50 Anaerovibrio. 51 Ac ce pt ed A rti cle","PeriodicalId":8558,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cecal microbiota composition in a three-way cross model in two hybrid pigs\",\"authors\":\"Yuting Yang, Liyan Shen, Huan Gao, Jinming Ran, Xian Li, Hengxin Jiang, Xueyan Li, Zhenhui Cao, Ying Huang, Sumei Zhao, Chunlian Song, H. Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.5713/ajas.20.0681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"30 Objectives: The intestinal microbiota plays an important role in host physiology, metabolism, 31 immunity, and behavior. And host genetics could influence the gut microbiota of hybrid 32 animals. The three-way cross model is commonly utilized in commercial pig production; 33 however, the effects of this model on the gut microbial composition are rarely reported. 34 Methods: Two three-way hybrid pigs were selected, with Saba pigs as the starting maternal 35 pig: Duroc × (Berkshire × Saba) (DBS) pig, Berkshire × (Duroc × Saba) (BDS) pig. One 36 hundred pigs of each model were reared from 35 days (d) to 210 d. The body weight or feed 37 consumption of all pigs were recorded and their feed/gain (F/G) ratio was calculated. On day 38 210, 10 pigs were selected for slaughter, and cecal chyme samples were collected for 16S 39 rRNA gene sequencing. 40 Results: The final body weight (FBW) and average daily gain (ADG) of DBS pigs were 41 significantly higher than those of BDS pigs (p<0.05), while the F/G ratios of DBS pigs were 42 significantly lower than those of BDS pigs (p<0.05). The dominant phyla in DBS and BDS 43 pigs were Bacteroidetes (55.23% vs 59%, respectively) and Firmicutes (36.65% vs 34.86%, 44 respectively) (p>0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Prevotella, Roseburia, and 45 Anaerovibrio in DBS pigs was significantly lower than in BDS pigs (p<0.01). The abundance 46 of Eubacterium, Clostridium XI, Bacteroides, Methanomassiliicoccus, and Parabacteroides in 47 DBS pigs was significantly higher than in BDS pigs (p<0.05). The FBWs and ADGs were 48 positively correlated with Bacteroides, ClostridiumXI, and Parabacteroides but negatively 49 correlated with the Prevotella, Prevotella/Bacteroides (P/B) ratio, Roseburia, and 50 Anaerovibrio. 51 Ac ce pt ed A rti cle\",\"PeriodicalId\":8558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肠道微生物群在宿主生理、代谢、免疫和行为中起着重要作用。宿主遗传可能会影响杂交动物的肠道微生物群。商品生猪生产中常用的是三元杂交模式;33然而,该模型对肠道微生物组成的影响鲜有报道。34方法:选择2头三元杂交猪,以萨巴猪为起始母代35头猪:杜洛克×(伯克夏×萨巴)(DBS)猪、伯克夏×(杜洛克×萨巴)(BDS)猪。每组36头猪,饲养35 ~ 210 d,记录猪体质量或饲料耗量,计算料重比。试验第38210天,选择10头猪屠宰,采集盲肠食糜样本进行16s39 rRNA基因测序。40结果:DBS猪终末体重(FBW)和平均日增重(ADG)显著高于BDS猪(p0.05)。在属水平上,DBS猪的Prevotella、Roseburia和45型厌氧菌的丰度显著低于BDS猪(p<0.01)。47头DBS猪中真杆菌、梭状芽孢杆菌、拟杆菌、甲烷杆菌和副杆菌的丰度显著高于BDS猪(p<0.05)。FBWs和ADGs与拟杆菌(Bacteroides)、梭菌(ClostridiumXI)和拟副杆菌(parabobacteriides)呈48正相关,与Prevotella、Prevotella/Bacteroides (P/B)比、Roseburia和厌氧弧菌(Anaerovibrio)呈50负相关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of cecal microbiota composition in a three-way cross model in two hybrid pigs
30 Objectives: The intestinal microbiota plays an important role in host physiology, metabolism, 31 immunity, and behavior. And host genetics could influence the gut microbiota of hybrid 32 animals. The three-way cross model is commonly utilized in commercial pig production; 33 however, the effects of this model on the gut microbial composition are rarely reported. 34 Methods: Two three-way hybrid pigs were selected, with Saba pigs as the starting maternal 35 pig: Duroc × (Berkshire × Saba) (DBS) pig, Berkshire × (Duroc × Saba) (BDS) pig. One 36 hundred pigs of each model were reared from 35 days (d) to 210 d. The body weight or feed 37 consumption of all pigs were recorded and their feed/gain (F/G) ratio was calculated. On day 38 210, 10 pigs were selected for slaughter, and cecal chyme samples were collected for 16S 39 rRNA gene sequencing. 40 Results: The final body weight (FBW) and average daily gain (ADG) of DBS pigs were 41 significantly higher than those of BDS pigs (p<0.05), while the F/G ratios of DBS pigs were 42 significantly lower than those of BDS pigs (p<0.05). The dominant phyla in DBS and BDS 43 pigs were Bacteroidetes (55.23% vs 59%, respectively) and Firmicutes (36.65% vs 34.86%, 44 respectively) (p>0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Prevotella, Roseburia, and 45 Anaerovibrio in DBS pigs was significantly lower than in BDS pigs (p<0.01). The abundance 46 of Eubacterium, Clostridium XI, Bacteroides, Methanomassiliicoccus, and Parabacteroides in 47 DBS pigs was significantly higher than in BDS pigs (p<0.05). The FBWs and ADGs were 48 positively correlated with Bacteroides, ClostridiumXI, and Parabacteroides but negatively 49 correlated with the Prevotella, Prevotella/Bacteroides (P/B) ratio, Roseburia, and 50 Anaerovibrio. 51 Ac ce pt ed A rti cle
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) aims to publish original and cutting-edge research results and reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences. Emphasis will be placed on studies involving farm animals such as cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and poultry. Studies for the improvement of human health using animal models may also be publishable. AJAS will encompass all areas of animal production and fundamental aspects of animal sciences: breeding and genetics, reproduction and physiology, nutrition, meat and milk science, biotechnology, behavior, welfare, health, and livestock farming systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信