{"title":"在民族志合作中创建共享的“活动时间空间”:调整知识、同步节奏、重构/构建角色","authors":"Imogen Bayfield","doi":"10.1353/cla.2022.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article has three aims. First, it suggests that for collaborators to navigate their way out of uncertainty, they produce a shared \"activity timespace\" (cf. Bryant and Knight 2019a). I argue that this involves (i) the coalescence of future orientations, as a shared understanding of the purpose(s) of the collaboration is produced; (ii) rhythmic synchronicity, as activities become coordinated; and (iii) the reproduction of the roles of collaborators in relation to one another. The second aim is to illustrate two ways in which ethnographer and collaborators navigate their way out of a space of uncertainty to create a shared activity timespace. One is intentional and uses questioning to align knowledge. The other is unintentional, as the ethnographer is encouraged to \"be there\" until an opportunity to collaborate emerges. The third goal of the article is to suggest that analysis of anticipation within ethnographic collaboration needs to focus not only on the anticipation of events but on our roles in relation to one another (cf. Stephan and Flaherty 2019). Through collaboration, it is not only anticipation about what the future could be that is forced into flux, but also anticipation about how those futures might come to be built, as \"cultural futures\" (Appadurai 2013) are embedded within expectations of how to act and what to aim for in collaborative encounters.","PeriodicalId":88456,"journal":{"name":"Collaborative anthropologies","volume":"14 1","pages":"63 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating a Shared \\\"Activity Timespace\\\" in Ethnographic Collaboration: Aligning Knowledge, Synchronizing Rhythms, Re/Constructing Roles\",\"authors\":\"Imogen Bayfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cla.2022.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article has three aims. First, it suggests that for collaborators to navigate their way out of uncertainty, they produce a shared \\\"activity timespace\\\" (cf. Bryant and Knight 2019a). I argue that this involves (i) the coalescence of future orientations, as a shared understanding of the purpose(s) of the collaboration is produced; (ii) rhythmic synchronicity, as activities become coordinated; and (iii) the reproduction of the roles of collaborators in relation to one another. The second aim is to illustrate two ways in which ethnographer and collaborators navigate their way out of a space of uncertainty to create a shared activity timespace. One is intentional and uses questioning to align knowledge. The other is unintentional, as the ethnographer is encouraged to \\\"be there\\\" until an opportunity to collaborate emerges. The third goal of the article is to suggest that analysis of anticipation within ethnographic collaboration needs to focus not only on the anticipation of events but on our roles in relation to one another (cf. Stephan and Flaherty 2019). Through collaboration, it is not only anticipation about what the future could be that is forced into flux, but also anticipation about how those futures might come to be built, as \\\"cultural futures\\\" (Appadurai 2013) are embedded within expectations of how to act and what to aim for in collaborative encounters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collaborative anthropologies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collaborative anthropologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2022.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collaborative anthropologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2022.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文有三个目的。首先,它表明合作者要走出不确定性,他们会产生一个共享的“活动时间空间”(参见Bryant和Knight 2019a)。我认为这涉及(I)未来方向的合并,因为对合作目的的共同理解产生了;(ii)节奏同步性,即活动变得协调;(三)合作者角色在彼此关系中的再现。第二个目的是说明两种方式,其中民族志学者和合作者导航他们的方式走出一个不确定的空间,创造一个共享的活动时间空间。一种是有意的,通过提问来整合知识。另一个是无意的,因为人种学家被鼓励“待在那里”,直到合作的机会出现。本文的第三个目标是建议对民族志合作中的预期进行分析,不仅需要关注对事件的预期,还需要关注我们彼此之间的角色(参见Stephan and Flaherty 2019)。通过合作,不仅是对未来可能是什么样子的预期,而且是对这些未来可能如何建立的预期,因为“文化未来”(Appadurai 2013)嵌入了对如何在合作中行动和目标的期望中。
Creating a Shared "Activity Timespace" in Ethnographic Collaboration: Aligning Knowledge, Synchronizing Rhythms, Re/Constructing Roles
Abstract:This article has three aims. First, it suggests that for collaborators to navigate their way out of uncertainty, they produce a shared "activity timespace" (cf. Bryant and Knight 2019a). I argue that this involves (i) the coalescence of future orientations, as a shared understanding of the purpose(s) of the collaboration is produced; (ii) rhythmic synchronicity, as activities become coordinated; and (iii) the reproduction of the roles of collaborators in relation to one another. The second aim is to illustrate two ways in which ethnographer and collaborators navigate their way out of a space of uncertainty to create a shared activity timespace. One is intentional and uses questioning to align knowledge. The other is unintentional, as the ethnographer is encouraged to "be there" until an opportunity to collaborate emerges. The third goal of the article is to suggest that analysis of anticipation within ethnographic collaboration needs to focus not only on the anticipation of events but on our roles in relation to one another (cf. Stephan and Flaherty 2019). Through collaboration, it is not only anticipation about what the future could be that is forced into flux, but also anticipation about how those futures might come to be built, as "cultural futures" (Appadurai 2013) are embedded within expectations of how to act and what to aim for in collaborative encounters.