人、道德价值和胚胎。对支持堕胎的论点的批判性分析

IF 1.4 Q2 ETHICS

New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/20502877.2021.1993639

G. Petkovic

{"title":"人、道德价值和胚胎。对支持堕胎的论点的批判性分析","authors":"G. Petkovic","doi":"10.1080/20502877.2021.1993639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European Health Information Gateway, 2021. Health for all explorer. Available from: https://gateway.euro. who.int/en/hfa-explorer/. Guttmacher Institute, 2019. The U.S. abortion rate continues to drop: once again, state abortion restrictions are not the main driver. New York: Guttmacher Institute. Husfeldt, C., et al., 1995. Ambivalence among women applying for abortion. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 74, 813–817. Hussey, L.S., 2010. Welfare generosity, abortion access, and abortion rates: A comparison of state policy tools. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 266–283. ———., 2011. Is welfare pro-life? Assistance programs, abortion, and the moderating role of states. Social Service Review, 85, 75–107. Levine, P., 2004. Sex and consequences: abortion, public policy, and the economics of fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.","PeriodicalId":43760,"journal":{"name":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","volume":"27 1","pages":"371 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos. A Critical Analysis of Pro-Choice Arguments\",\"authors\":\"G. Petkovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20502877.2021.1993639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"European Health Information Gateway, 2021. Health for all explorer. Available from: https://gateway.euro. who.int/en/hfa-explorer/. Guttmacher Institute, 2019. The U.S. abortion rate continues to drop: once again, state abortion restrictions are not the main driver. New York: Guttmacher Institute. Husfeldt, C., et al., 1995. Ambivalence among women applying for abortion. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 74, 813–817. Hussey, L.S., 2010. Welfare generosity, abortion access, and abortion rates: A comparison of state policy tools. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 266–283. ———., 2011. Is welfare pro-life? Assistance programs, abortion, and the moderating role of states. Social Service Review, 85, 75–107. Levine, P., 2004. Sex and consequences: abortion, public policy, and the economics of fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"371 - 374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2021.1993639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2021.1993639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲卫生信息门户，2021年。所有探索者的健康。可从:https://gateway.euro。. int / en / hfa-explorer /。古特马赫研究所，2019。美国的堕胎率继续下降:再一次，州堕胎限制不是主要驱动因素。纽约:古特马赫研究所。胡斯菲尔德等人，1995。申请堕胎妇女的矛盾心理。斯堪的纳维亚妇产科学报，74,813-817。赫西，美国，2010。福利慷慨、堕胎途径和堕胎率:国家政策工具的比较。社会科学季刊，9(1)，266-283。——, 2011年。福利是反堕胎吗?援助项目，堕胎，以及各州的调节作用。社会服务评论，2004,15(5):557 - 557。莱文，P.， 2004。性与后果:堕胎、公共政策和生育经济学。普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos. A Critical Analysis of Pro-Choice Arguments

European Health Information Gateway, 2021. Health for all explorer. Available from: https://gateway.euro. who.int/en/hfa-explorer/. Guttmacher Institute, 2019. The U.S. abortion rate continues to drop: once again, state abortion restrictions are not the main driver. New York: Guttmacher Institute. Husfeldt, C., et al., 1995. Ambivalence among women applying for abortion. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 74, 813–817. Hussey, L.S., 2010. Welfare generosity, abortion access, and abortion rates: A comparison of state policy tools. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 266–283. ———., 2011. Is welfare pro-life? Assistance programs, abortion, and the moderating role of states. Social Service Review, 85, 75–107. Levine, P., 2004. Sex and consequences: abortion, public policy, and the economics of fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body ETHICS-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

16.70%

发文量