书评:《超级污染者:处理世界上最大的破坏气候的排放点》

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Richard York
{"title":"书评:《超级污染者:处理世界上最大的破坏气候的排放点》","authors":"Richard York","doi":"10.1177/00207152231183563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"justice,” they sometimes struggled with embracing reproductive justice as a deeper framework. At times, SisterSong received better reception with global organizations. SisterSong was ambitious, innovative, and progressive as they became involved in global, anti-racist activism as it affected women in multiple spheres such as the political, workplace, and family. SisterSong also demonstrated how the U.S. influences global conditions and how U.S. citizens can think globally to reduce suffering and promote human rights, which include reproductive rights. This also meant that U.S. women in the movement had to confront their global privilege. In essence, SisterSong was truly revolutionary in numerous ways as they adopted an intersectional approach before “intersectional” became a buzz word. SisterSong also moved reproductive rights discussions beyond disease models and refocused the idea of human rights beyond legal definitions. They also shifted perspectives on reproductive justice away from the individual instead concentrating on structures that can simultaneously create and alleviate problems. Essentially, SisterSong was attempting to create cultural shifts by facilitating the ways that people think about human and reproductive rights, hoping that those changes lead to action and change. Given the scope and novelty of this book, it should be considered for inclusion in graduate social movements courses as SisterSong is both a historical and contemporary case study, and reproductive justice movements are often overlooked in social movements literature. The book may also be well suited for rhetoric courses owing to Dr. Luna’s analysis of multiple messages and techniques that SisterSong used to motivate multiple audiences. Last, instructors designing nonprofit management courses may want to contemplate inclusion of this book given the snapshots we readers receive of the “soft skills” of leadership, communication, strategy, and intellectual labor that goes into serious and sustainable organization building. In essence, I hope that Dr. Luna’s enormous undertaking is widely acknowledged and gives SisterSong some well-deserved attention beyond smaller reproductive justice circles.","PeriodicalId":51601,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Super Polluters: Tackling the World’s Largest Sites of Climate-Disrupting Emissions\",\"authors\":\"Richard York\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207152231183563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"justice,” they sometimes struggled with embracing reproductive justice as a deeper framework. At times, SisterSong received better reception with global organizations. SisterSong was ambitious, innovative, and progressive as they became involved in global, anti-racist activism as it affected women in multiple spheres such as the political, workplace, and family. SisterSong also demonstrated how the U.S. influences global conditions and how U.S. citizens can think globally to reduce suffering and promote human rights, which include reproductive rights. This also meant that U.S. women in the movement had to confront their global privilege. In essence, SisterSong was truly revolutionary in numerous ways as they adopted an intersectional approach before “intersectional” became a buzz word. SisterSong also moved reproductive rights discussions beyond disease models and refocused the idea of human rights beyond legal definitions. They also shifted perspectives on reproductive justice away from the individual instead concentrating on structures that can simultaneously create and alleviate problems. Essentially, SisterSong was attempting to create cultural shifts by facilitating the ways that people think about human and reproductive rights, hoping that those changes lead to action and change. Given the scope and novelty of this book, it should be considered for inclusion in graduate social movements courses as SisterSong is both a historical and contemporary case study, and reproductive justice movements are often overlooked in social movements literature. The book may also be well suited for rhetoric courses owing to Dr. Luna’s analysis of multiple messages and techniques that SisterSong used to motivate multiple audiences. Last, instructors designing nonprofit management courses may want to contemplate inclusion of this book given the snapshots we readers receive of the “soft skills” of leadership, communication, strategy, and intellectual labor that goes into serious and sustainable organization building. In essence, I hope that Dr. Luna’s enormous undertaking is widely acknowledged and gives SisterSong some well-deserved attention beyond smaller reproductive justice circles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152231183563\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152231183563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正义”,他们有时很难将生殖正义作为一个更深层次的框架。有时,“宋姐妹”在全球组织中受到更好的接待。当她们参与到全球性的反种族主义活动中,比如政治、工作场所和家庭等多个领域的女性受到影响时,宋姐妹雄心勃勃、富有创新精神、进步精神。宋姐妹还展示了美国如何影响全球形势,以及美国公民如何从全球角度思考,以减少痛苦和促进人权,其中包括生殖权利。这也意味着运动中的美国妇女必须面对她们的全球特权。从本质上讲,姐妹歌在很多方面都是真正的革命性的,因为在“交叉”成为一个流行词之前,她们采用了交叉的方法。宋姐妹还推动生殖权利讨论超越疾病模型,并重新聚焦超越法律定义的人权概念。他们还将生殖正义的观点从个人转移到可以同时制造和缓解问题的结构上。从本质上讲,宋姐试图通过促进人们对人权和生殖权利的思考方式来创造文化转变,希望这些变化能带来行动和改变。考虑到这本书的范围和新颖性,它应该被考虑纳入研究生社会运动课程,因为《宋姐妹》既是历史的也是当代的案例研究,而生殖正义运动在社会运动文学中经常被忽视。这本书也很适合修辞学课程,因为卢娜博士分析了《宋姐姐》用来激励多种受众的多种信息和技巧。最后,考虑到我们读者对领导力、沟通、战略和智力劳动等“软技能”的了解,设计非营利组织管理课程的教师可能会考虑将本书纳入其中,这些“软技能”是认真和可持续的组织建设所必需的。从本质上讲,我希望卢娜博士的巨大事业得到广泛认可,并在较小的生殖正义圈子之外给予宋姐妹一些应得的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book review: Super Polluters: Tackling the World’s Largest Sites of Climate-Disrupting Emissions
justice,” they sometimes struggled with embracing reproductive justice as a deeper framework. At times, SisterSong received better reception with global organizations. SisterSong was ambitious, innovative, and progressive as they became involved in global, anti-racist activism as it affected women in multiple spheres such as the political, workplace, and family. SisterSong also demonstrated how the U.S. influences global conditions and how U.S. citizens can think globally to reduce suffering and promote human rights, which include reproductive rights. This also meant that U.S. women in the movement had to confront their global privilege. In essence, SisterSong was truly revolutionary in numerous ways as they adopted an intersectional approach before “intersectional” became a buzz word. SisterSong also moved reproductive rights discussions beyond disease models and refocused the idea of human rights beyond legal definitions. They also shifted perspectives on reproductive justice away from the individual instead concentrating on structures that can simultaneously create and alleviate problems. Essentially, SisterSong was attempting to create cultural shifts by facilitating the ways that people think about human and reproductive rights, hoping that those changes lead to action and change. Given the scope and novelty of this book, it should be considered for inclusion in graduate social movements courses as SisterSong is both a historical and contemporary case study, and reproductive justice movements are often overlooked in social movements literature. The book may also be well suited for rhetoric courses owing to Dr. Luna’s analysis of multiple messages and techniques that SisterSong used to motivate multiple audiences. Last, instructors designing nonprofit management courses may want to contemplate inclusion of this book given the snapshots we readers receive of the “soft skills” of leadership, communication, strategy, and intellectual labor that goes into serious and sustainable organization building. In essence, I hope that Dr. Luna’s enormous undertaking is widely acknowledged and gives SisterSong some well-deserved attention beyond smaller reproductive justice circles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Comparative Sociology was established in 1960 to publish the highest quality peer reviewed research that is both international in scope and comparative in method. The journal draws articles from sociologists worldwide and encourages competing perspectives. IJCS recognizes that many significant research questions are inherently interdisciplinary, and therefore welcomes work from scholars in related disciplines, including political science, geography, economics, anthropology, and business sciences. The journal is published six times a year, including special issues on topics of special interest to the international social science community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信