飞行器多学科结构优化研究进展、挑战与展望

IF 11.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
G. Corrado , G. Ntourmas , M. Sferza , N. Traiforos , A. Arteiro , L. Brown , D. Chronopoulos , F. Daoud , F. Glock , J. Ninic , E. Ozcan , J. Reinoso , G. Schuhmacher , T. Turner
{"title":"飞行器多学科结构优化研究进展、挑战与展望","authors":"G. Corrado ,&nbsp;G. Ntourmas ,&nbsp;M. Sferza ,&nbsp;N. Traiforos ,&nbsp;A. Arteiro ,&nbsp;L. Brown ,&nbsp;D. Chronopoulos ,&nbsp;F. Daoud ,&nbsp;F. Glock ,&nbsp;J. Ninic ,&nbsp;E. Ozcan ,&nbsp;J. Reinoso ,&nbsp;G. Schuhmacher ,&nbsp;T. Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Designing an airframe<span> is a complex process as it requires knowledge from multiple disciplines such as aerodynamics, structural mechanics, manufacturing, flight dynamics, which individually lead to very different optimal designs. Furthermore, the growing use of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics<span> (CFRP), while allowing for more design freedom, has at the same time increased the complexity of the structural designers job. This has sparked the development of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), a framework aimed at integrating intelligence from multiple disciplines in one optimal design. Initially employed as a tool to coordinate the work of several design teams over months, MDO is now becoming an integrated software procedure which has evolved over the decades and has become a prominent tool in modern design of aerostructures.</span></span></p><p>A modern challenge in airframe design is the early use of MDO, motivated by a pressing industrial need for an increased level of detail at the beginning of the design process, to minimize late setbacks in product development. Originally employed only during preliminary design, MDO has recently being pushed into early evaluation of conceptual designs with the outlook of becoming established in the conceptual stage. Using MDO during conceptual design is a promising way to address the paradox of design. By improving each concept, evaluating whether it is capable of meeting the design requirements and computing the sensitivities of various performance measures with respect to a design change, MDO enables designers to gain valuable knowledge in a design phase, in which most of the design freedom is still available.</p><p>We hereby exhibit the contemporary trends of MDO with specific focus on composite aircraft and aerial vehicles. We present the recent developments and current state-of-the-art, describing the contemporary challenges and requirements for innovation that are in the development process by academic and industrial researchers, as well as the challenges designers face in further improving the MDO workflow. Within the European OptiMACS project, we devised a novel holistic MDO approach to integrate a number of solutions to challenges identified as industrial technological gaps. These include two-stage optimization for layers of composites, addressing the presence of process-induced distortions and consideration of advanced failure criteria, including refined local models in early design stages, and seamlessly integrating software tools in the design process. The proposed methods are integrated and tested for structural case studies and the obtained results show the potential benefits of their integration into MDO tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54553,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Aerospace Sciences","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 100861"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent progress, challenges and outlook for multidisciplinary structural optimization of aircraft and aerial vehicles\",\"authors\":\"G. Corrado ,&nbsp;G. Ntourmas ,&nbsp;M. Sferza ,&nbsp;N. Traiforos ,&nbsp;A. Arteiro ,&nbsp;L. Brown ,&nbsp;D. Chronopoulos ,&nbsp;F. Daoud ,&nbsp;F. Glock ,&nbsp;J. Ninic ,&nbsp;E. Ozcan ,&nbsp;J. Reinoso ,&nbsp;G. Schuhmacher ,&nbsp;T. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Designing an airframe<span> is a complex process as it requires knowledge from multiple disciplines such as aerodynamics, structural mechanics, manufacturing, flight dynamics, which individually lead to very different optimal designs. Furthermore, the growing use of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics<span> (CFRP), while allowing for more design freedom, has at the same time increased the complexity of the structural designers job. This has sparked the development of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), a framework aimed at integrating intelligence from multiple disciplines in one optimal design. Initially employed as a tool to coordinate the work of several design teams over months, MDO is now becoming an integrated software procedure which has evolved over the decades and has become a prominent tool in modern design of aerostructures.</span></span></p><p>A modern challenge in airframe design is the early use of MDO, motivated by a pressing industrial need for an increased level of detail at the beginning of the design process, to minimize late setbacks in product development. Originally employed only during preliminary design, MDO has recently being pushed into early evaluation of conceptual designs with the outlook of becoming established in the conceptual stage. Using MDO during conceptual design is a promising way to address the paradox of design. By improving each concept, evaluating whether it is capable of meeting the design requirements and computing the sensitivities of various performance measures with respect to a design change, MDO enables designers to gain valuable knowledge in a design phase, in which most of the design freedom is still available.</p><p>We hereby exhibit the contemporary trends of MDO with specific focus on composite aircraft and aerial vehicles. We present the recent developments and current state-of-the-art, describing the contemporary challenges and requirements for innovation that are in the development process by academic and industrial researchers, as well as the challenges designers face in further improving the MDO workflow. Within the European OptiMACS project, we devised a novel holistic MDO approach to integrate a number of solutions to challenges identified as industrial technological gaps. These include two-stage optimization for layers of composites, addressing the presence of process-induced distortions and consideration of advanced failure criteria, including refined local models in early design stages, and seamlessly integrating software tools in the design process. The proposed methods are integrated and tested for structural case studies and the obtained results show the potential benefits of their integration into MDO tools.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Aerospace Sciences\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Aerospace Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376042122000537\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Aerospace Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376042122000537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

设计机身是一个复杂的过程,因为它需要来自多个学科的知识,如空气动力学、结构力学、制造、飞行动力学,这些学科单独导致非常不同的最佳设计。此外,碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)的使用越来越多,虽然允许更多的设计自由度,但同时也增加了结构设计师工作的复杂性。这引发了多学科设计优化(MDO)的发展,这是一个旨在将多个学科的智能集成到一个优化设计中的框架。MDO最初被用作协调几个设计团队工作的工具,现在已成为一个集成的软件程序,经过几十年的发展,已成为现代航空结构设计中的重要工具。机体设计中的一个现代挑战是早期使用MDO,这是由于迫切需要在设计过程开始时提高细节水平,以尽量减少产品开发中的后期挫折。最初仅在初步设计中使用MDO,最近已被推进到概念设计的早期评估,并有望在概念阶段建立。在概念设计中使用MDO是解决设计悖论的一种很有前途的方法。通过改进每个概念,评估它是否能够满足设计要求,并计算与设计变更相关的各种性能指标的敏感性,MDO使设计师能够在设计阶段获得有价值的知识,其中大部分设计自由仍然可用。我们在此展示MDO的当代趋势,特别关注复合飞机和飞行器。我们介绍了最新的发展和当前的最先进的技术,描述了学术和工业研究人员在开发过程中对创新的当代挑战和要求,以及设计师在进一步改进MDO工作流程时面临的挑战。在欧洲OptiMACS项目中,我们设计了一种新颖的整体MDO方法,以整合许多解决方案,以应对工业技术差距的挑战。其中包括复合材料层的两阶段优化,解决工艺引起的变形问题,考虑高级失效标准,包括在早期设计阶段改进局部模型,以及在设计过程中无缝集成软件工具。对所提出的方法进行了集成和结构案例研究测试,获得的结果显示了将它们集成到MDO工具中的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent progress, challenges and outlook for multidisciplinary structural optimization of aircraft and aerial vehicles

Designing an airframe is a complex process as it requires knowledge from multiple disciplines such as aerodynamics, structural mechanics, manufacturing, flight dynamics, which individually lead to very different optimal designs. Furthermore, the growing use of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics (CFRP), while allowing for more design freedom, has at the same time increased the complexity of the structural designers job. This has sparked the development of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), a framework aimed at integrating intelligence from multiple disciplines in one optimal design. Initially employed as a tool to coordinate the work of several design teams over months, MDO is now becoming an integrated software procedure which has evolved over the decades and has become a prominent tool in modern design of aerostructures.

A modern challenge in airframe design is the early use of MDO, motivated by a pressing industrial need for an increased level of detail at the beginning of the design process, to minimize late setbacks in product development. Originally employed only during preliminary design, MDO has recently being pushed into early evaluation of conceptual designs with the outlook of becoming established in the conceptual stage. Using MDO during conceptual design is a promising way to address the paradox of design. By improving each concept, evaluating whether it is capable of meeting the design requirements and computing the sensitivities of various performance measures with respect to a design change, MDO enables designers to gain valuable knowledge in a design phase, in which most of the design freedom is still available.

We hereby exhibit the contemporary trends of MDO with specific focus on composite aircraft and aerial vehicles. We present the recent developments and current state-of-the-art, describing the contemporary challenges and requirements for innovation that are in the development process by academic and industrial researchers, as well as the challenges designers face in further improving the MDO workflow. Within the European OptiMACS project, we devised a novel holistic MDO approach to integrate a number of solutions to challenges identified as industrial technological gaps. These include two-stage optimization for layers of composites, addressing the presence of process-induced distortions and consideration of advanced failure criteria, including refined local models in early design stages, and seamlessly integrating software tools in the design process. The proposed methods are integrated and tested for structural case studies and the obtained results show the potential benefits of their integration into MDO tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Aerospace Sciences
Progress in Aerospace Sciences 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: "Progress in Aerospace Sciences" is a prestigious international review journal focusing on research in aerospace sciences and its applications in research organizations, industry, and universities. The journal aims to appeal to a wide range of readers and provide valuable information. The primary content of the journal consists of specially commissioned review articles. These articles serve to collate the latest advancements in the expansive field of aerospace sciences. Unlike other journals, there are no restrictions on the length of papers. Authors are encouraged to furnish specialist readers with a clear and concise summary of recent work, while also providing enough detail for general aerospace readers to stay updated on developments in fields beyond their own expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信