{"title":"小学第二语言词汇学习:测试模型技术特征分析","authors":"Gema Alcaraz-Mármol","doi":"10.29393/rla59-10avga10010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the effect of three activities on ESL vocabulary acquisition. Three groups of students in their sixth year of Primary Education participated. Each group worked new vocabulary with a different activity. The first group used reading plus flash cards; the second did the same through reading plus filling the gaps; the third one worked with a crossword. Each activity meets a different number of criteria within the so-called Technique Feature Analysis (Nation and Webb, 2011). This model is specifically designed to explain the lexical processing in a second language. After the activities were done, the participants’ receptive and productive knowledge was tested. The results suggest that this model is sensitive to receptive vocabulary knowledge in second language, while it is not to productive knowledge.","PeriodicalId":35168,"journal":{"name":"RLA","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APRENDIZAJE DE VOCABULARIO EN SEGUNDA LENGUA EN EDUCACIÓN PRIMARIA: PONIENDO A PRUEBA EL MODELO TECHNIQUE FEATURE ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"Gema Alcaraz-Mármol\",\"doi\":\"10.29393/rla59-10avga10010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the effect of three activities on ESL vocabulary acquisition. Three groups of students in their sixth year of Primary Education participated. Each group worked new vocabulary with a different activity. The first group used reading plus flash cards; the second did the same through reading plus filling the gaps; the third one worked with a crossword. Each activity meets a different number of criteria within the so-called Technique Feature Analysis (Nation and Webb, 2011). This model is specifically designed to explain the lexical processing in a second language. After the activities were done, the participants’ receptive and productive knowledge was tested. The results suggest that this model is sensitive to receptive vocabulary knowledge in second language, while it is not to productive knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RLA\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RLA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29393/rla59-10avga10010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RLA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29393/rla59-10avga10010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
APRENDIZAJE DE VOCABULARIO EN SEGUNDA LENGUA EN EDUCACIÓN PRIMARIA: PONIENDO A PRUEBA EL MODELO TECHNIQUE FEATURE ANALYSIS
This study explores the effect of three activities on ESL vocabulary acquisition. Three groups of students in their sixth year of Primary Education participated. Each group worked new vocabulary with a different activity. The first group used reading plus flash cards; the second did the same through reading plus filling the gaps; the third one worked with a crossword. Each activity meets a different number of criteria within the so-called Technique Feature Analysis (Nation and Webb, 2011). This model is specifically designed to explain the lexical processing in a second language. After the activities were done, the participants’ receptive and productive knowledge was tested. The results suggest that this model is sensitive to receptive vocabulary knowledge in second language, while it is not to productive knowledge.