住院结核病患者DOTS依从性咨询的质量

Shikongo IN Taati, F. Kalemeera, D. Kibuule
{"title":"住院结核病患者DOTS依从性咨询的质量","authors":"Shikongo IN Taati, F. Kalemeera, D. Kibuule","doi":"10.4236/JTR.2019.72008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Setting: Non-adherence to tuberculosis treatment is a risk factor for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). In 2015, 480,000 cases of MDR-TB were notified worldwide, leading to 250,000 deaths. Aim: The quality of the Directly Observed Treatment (DOT) adherence counselling among patients with drug resistant and sensitive was assessed. Methods: A hospital based crossectional analytical study was conducted at the national TB hospital in Windhoek among patients with MDR-TB and drug susceptible TB (DS-TB). The quality of adherence counselling was assessed against the WHO counselling guidelines using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Quality was measured by completeness, duration and frequency of the adherence counselling sessions or program as well as patient satisfaction and preferences. Quantitative and qualitative data were by descriptive statistics in SPSS v23 and thematic analysis respectively. Results: Of the 50 patients, 60% were male, 76% were aged <45 years and 92% perceived the direct observation of TB treatment as good or excellent. Only 40% of the patients received DOT adherence counselling over the last three months and 16% had not received counselling since admissions. The patient-related factors affecting the quality of DOT adherence counselling were forgetfulness (22%) and/or treatment cessation upon feeling better (12%), limited access to DOT services in the community versus the health facility and lack of individual versus group counselling as well as comprehension of languages and messages used during counselling. Conclusions: The quality of DOT adherence counselling among hospitalized TB patients is sub-optimal. There is need for a standard operating procedure and guidelines for effective adherence counselling among TB patients to optimize treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":70603,"journal":{"name":"结核病研究(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of DOTS Adherence Counselling among Hospitalized Tuberculosis Patients\",\"authors\":\"Shikongo IN Taati, F. Kalemeera, D. Kibuule\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/JTR.2019.72008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Setting: Non-adherence to tuberculosis treatment is a risk factor for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). In 2015, 480,000 cases of MDR-TB were notified worldwide, leading to 250,000 deaths. Aim: The quality of the Directly Observed Treatment (DOT) adherence counselling among patients with drug resistant and sensitive was assessed. Methods: A hospital based crossectional analytical study was conducted at the national TB hospital in Windhoek among patients with MDR-TB and drug susceptible TB (DS-TB). The quality of adherence counselling was assessed against the WHO counselling guidelines using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Quality was measured by completeness, duration and frequency of the adherence counselling sessions or program as well as patient satisfaction and preferences. Quantitative and qualitative data were by descriptive statistics in SPSS v23 and thematic analysis respectively. Results: Of the 50 patients, 60% were male, 76% were aged <45 years and 92% perceived the direct observation of TB treatment as good or excellent. Only 40% of the patients received DOT adherence counselling over the last three months and 16% had not received counselling since admissions. The patient-related factors affecting the quality of DOT adherence counselling were forgetfulness (22%) and/or treatment cessation upon feeling better (12%), limited access to DOT services in the community versus the health facility and lack of individual versus group counselling as well as comprehension of languages and messages used during counselling. Conclusions: The quality of DOT adherence counselling among hospitalized TB patients is sub-optimal. There is need for a standard operating procedure and guidelines for effective adherence counselling among TB patients to optimize treatment outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":70603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"结核病研究(英文)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"结核病研究(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/JTR.2019.72008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"结核病研究(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JTR.2019.72008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不坚持结核病治疗是耐多药结核病的危险因素。2015年,全球报告了48万例耐多药结核病病例,导致25万人死亡。目的:评估耐药和敏感患者直接观察治疗(DOT)依从性咨询的质量。方法:在温得和克的国家结核病医院对耐多药结核病和药物敏感结核病(DS-TB)患者进行了一项基于医院的交叉分析研究。根据世界卫生组织咨询指南,使用访谈者管理的问卷对坚持性咨询的质量进行评估。质量通过依从性咨询会议或项目的完整性、持续时间和频率以及患者满意度和偏好来衡量。定量和定性数据分别采用SPSS v23中的描述性统计和专题分析。结果:在50名患者中,60%为男性,76%的患者年龄<45岁,92%的患者认为结核病治疗的直接观察结果良好或优秀。在过去三个月里,只有40%的患者接受了DOT依从性咨询,16%的患者自入院以来没有接受过咨询。影响DOT依从性咨询质量的患者相关因素包括健忘(22%)和/或感觉好转后停止治疗(12%)、在社区与卫生机构获得DOT服务的机会有限、缺乏个人与团体咨询以及对咨询期间使用的语言和信息的理解。结论:住院结核病患者DOT依从性咨询的质量次优。需要制定一个标准的操作程序和指南,在结核病患者中进行有效的依从性咨询,以优化治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of DOTS Adherence Counselling among Hospitalized Tuberculosis Patients
Setting: Non-adherence to tuberculosis treatment is a risk factor for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). In 2015, 480,000 cases of MDR-TB were notified worldwide, leading to 250,000 deaths. Aim: The quality of the Directly Observed Treatment (DOT) adherence counselling among patients with drug resistant and sensitive was assessed. Methods: A hospital based crossectional analytical study was conducted at the national TB hospital in Windhoek among patients with MDR-TB and drug susceptible TB (DS-TB). The quality of adherence counselling was assessed against the WHO counselling guidelines using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Quality was measured by completeness, duration and frequency of the adherence counselling sessions or program as well as patient satisfaction and preferences. Quantitative and qualitative data were by descriptive statistics in SPSS v23 and thematic analysis respectively. Results: Of the 50 patients, 60% were male, 76% were aged <45 years and 92% perceived the direct observation of TB treatment as good or excellent. Only 40% of the patients received DOT adherence counselling over the last three months and 16% had not received counselling since admissions. The patient-related factors affecting the quality of DOT adherence counselling were forgetfulness (22%) and/or treatment cessation upon feeling better (12%), limited access to DOT services in the community versus the health facility and lack of individual versus group counselling as well as comprehension of languages and messages used during counselling. Conclusions: The quality of DOT adherence counselling among hospitalized TB patients is sub-optimal. There is need for a standard operating procedure and guidelines for effective adherence counselling among TB patients to optimize treatment outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信